Prince Harry the Nazi

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

sorry man.. i dont have a clue..lol

Cool. Thanks anyway.

 

[Illuminattile]

Off subject, what does it mean when it says that I'm subscribed to this thread?

If you post a new thread, or reply to an existing thread, you can choose to be notified by email when someone else replies to that thread. You can also choose to receive email notifications of new posts in a thread without posting in that thread, by clicking the 'Subscribe to this thread' link displayed in the thread page.

If you choose to stop receiving email notifications from a thread, you can turn off the option by either editing your post, or by unsubscribing from the thread here.

Only registered users may receive email notification, and they can set whether they want to receive email notification by default by editing their options.

Email notification is also referred to as 'Thread Subscription'.

On your Control Panel it will list the threads/forums you're subscribed to. If you go to Edit Options you can choose what action is taken for subscribed threads/forums.

 

[Cown]

All I know is that the kid inherited some balls from Diana, that's for sure :thumb:

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

On your Control Panel it will list the threads/forums you're subscribed to. If you go to Edit Options you can choose what action is taken for subscribed threads/forums.

Thanks.

 

[not really ken]

So when Eminem dressed up as Osama Bin Laden that was funny but somehow this is 100% wrong? Just a difference in reaction to both of these incidents.

One real life, the other is a music video, their is a big difference between the two.

I dont care charity is charity and whatever your reasons for doing it arnt so low that it is unacceptable. Its not like Harry had a choice whether the Media surrounded him while he was doing it, they were going to be there even if he didnt want them. And I'm sure the people who received something from Harry while he was there dont think it was "laughable" they benefited thats all that matters.
And Jokerman do you have a source from what you said?

Your talking about the end result, im taling about the means. Besides, if the end is noble, then the means must be consistent. Ofcourse the people benefitting from the charity will not care about where the food comes from etc. but they are not the issue here, the issue is the sincerity of the giver, in this case harry.
In arabic, the word 'sadaqah' which means charity comes from a root word 'sidq' which means Sincerity. Is not the highest rank of benevolence that which is borne from sincerity.
the fact that the media follows Harry around is exactly the reason that guy is out their on these 'charity' trips. The Royal faily are known to play up for the cameras, its called PR and they are masters of it. The media are not allowed to be their if the Royal family say they can't be there. this was after the Diana incident and death. The media have to have permission to film and photograph Harry on any kind of event. So harry does have a choice wheter the media are there or not.

 

[groobz]

One real life, the other is a music video, their is a big difference between the two.
.

A fancy dress party is not real life. Thats the whole point of it being fancy dress,, so you can dress up as something that isn't you.

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

A fancy dress party is not real life. Thats the whole point of it being fancy dress,, so you can dress up as something that isn't you.

It's real simple.

Eminem - a dope rapper who also happens to act like a prick. His responsibility is to nobody.

Prince Harry - a dope smoker who is a grade 1 prick. His responsibility is to those who pay his way in this life and those he represents (the British people).

Harry has to answer to us, Eminem doesn't.

Also, Hitler massacred how many?
Bin Laden has a certified body count of...

 

[ArtsyGirl]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One real life, the other is a music video, their is a big difference between the two.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Humans both dressed up as evil people who have killed innocent people, the fact one was a music video is meaningless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your talking about the end result, im taling about the means. Besides, if the end is noble, then the means must be consistent. Ofcourse the people benefitting from the charity will not care about where the food comes from etc. but they are not the issue here, the issue is the sincerity of the giver, in this case harry.
In arabic, the word 'sadaqah' which means charity comes from a root word 'sidq' which means Sincerity. Is not the highest rank of benevolence that which is borne from sincerity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok if thats your opinion fine, but how much charity have you done out of the kindness of your heart? For me I could care less because at the end of the day if a corporation gives millions in aid to some country for the pure recognition they will get from the public which might increase business there is still people benefitting that are in dire need, now I might not respect the company but that money is still in the hands of the needy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the fact that the media follows Harry around is exactly the reason that guy is out their on these 'charity' trips. The Royal faily are known to play up for the cameras, its called PR and they are masters of it. The media are not allowed to be their if the Royal family say they can't be there. this was after the Diana incident and death. The media have to have permission to film and photograph Harry on any kind of event. So harry does have a choice wheter the media are there or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have a source on that? Because I specifically remember him coming to Australia to escape the media attention and he got it here too for a few weeks. Also while he was doing the charity work he didnt want the press there. I'd like to see a source anyway.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eminem - a dope rapper who also happens to act like a prick. His responsibility is to nobody.

Prince Harry - a dope smoker who is a grade 1 prick. His responsibility is to those who pay his way in this life and those he represents (the British people).
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Wow your comparisons are obviously from an objective point of view. Have you smoked weed before? He dressed up in a Nazi outfit he didnt steal millions from the "British" people - Your power only reaches so far.
-------------------------------------
Also, Hitler massacred how many?
Bin Laden has a certified body count of...
---------------------------------------

Does it really matter? Ofcourse Hitler had a larger scale of operation but I dont think the 3 thousand dead plus others around the world who have died from the order of Osama can argue that. Both men are evil who have killed innocent people unless your willing to deny that I dont see your point.

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One real life, the other is a music video, their is a big difference between the two.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Humans both dressed up as evil people who have killed innocent people, the fact one was a music video is meaningless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your talking about the end result, im taling about the means. Besides, if the end is noble, then the means must be consistent. Ofcourse the people benefitting from the charity will not care about where the food comes from etc. but they are not the issue here, the issue is the sincerity of the giver, in this case harry.
In arabic, the word 'sadaqah' which means charity comes from a root word 'sidq' which means Sincerity. Is not the highest rank of benevolence that which is borne from sincerity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok if thats your opinion fine, but how much charity have you done out of the kindness of your heart? For me I could care less because at the end of the day if a corporation gives millions in aid to some country for the pure recognition they will get from the public which might increase business there is still people benefitting that are in dire need, now I might not respect the company but that money is still in the hands of the needy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the fact that the media follows Harry around is exactly the reason that guy is out their on these 'charity' trips. The Royal faily are known to play up for the cameras, its called PR and they are masters of it. The media are not allowed to be their if the Royal family say they can't be there. this was after the Diana incident and death. The media have to have permission to film and photograph Harry on any kind of event. So harry does have a choice wheter the media are there or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have a source on that? Because I specifically remember him coming to Australia to escape the media attention and he got it here too for a few weeks. Also while he was doing the charity work he didnt want the press there. I'd like to see a source anyway.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eminem - a dope rapper who also happens to act like a prick. His responsibility is to nobody.

Prince Harry - a dope smoker who is a grade 1 prick. His responsibility is to those who pay his way in this life and those he represents (the British people).
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Wow your comparisons are obviously from an objective point of view. Have you smoked weed before? He dressed up in a Nazi outfit he didnt steal millions from the "British" people - Your power only reaches so far.
-------------------------------------
Also, Hitler massacred how many?
Bin Laden has a certified body count of...
---------------------------------------

Does it really matter? Ofcourse Hitler had a larger scale of operation but I dont think the 3 thousand dead plus others around the world who have died from the order of Osama can argue that. Both men are evil who have killed innocent people unless your willing to deny that I dont see your point.

Question

Do the British monarchy have power over Austrailia currently?

Does the Austrailian taxpayer fund the Royal family and their hanger-ons?

 

[Hankaveli]

But someone of his stature should know better. Third in line for the throne and he has no tact, common sense or sympathy.

world leaders everywhere are idiots.

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

world leaders everywhere are idiots.

True, but a sizeable number of world leaders are elected.

And out of those that aren't elected a lot have taken power illegally.

Harry has his position legally even though the people never chose him.

 

[Amara]

world leaders everywhere are idiots.

Calling him a "world leader" is a bit of a stretch of the imagination isn't it? Besides, I think even Bush and our Prime Minister, John Howard, would have the common sense and decency to choose a more suitable and sensitive outfit....although, they never cease to surprise me...

 

[Cown]

^True, he wont lead shit... He's just a figure that represent the UK, nothing more, (still this is what it's all about, he's sturring up some bad publicity for the royal family) but damn would I like his monthly paycheck :thumb:

 

[Amara]

Question

Do the British monarchy have power over Austrailia currently?

Does the Austrailian taxpayer fund the Royal family and their hanger-ons?

We are still part of the Commonwealth, but the monarchy does not "have power" in regards to decision making, - that is handled by the federal government. We still have Governers who act as "Queens Representatives" to handle administrative/symbolic duties - but even they are appointed from within Australia. And the issue of becoming a republic is still very much on the cards - we just need an appropriate time to hold a referendum (last time they held one, the majority may quite likely have voted yes, but for the unfavourable terms under which it was proposed). I can't speak for everyone in Australia, but I think there is general consensus that the monarchy is no longer necessary and that we have more than enough strength to stand alone.

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

We are still part of the Commonwealth, but the monarchy does not "have power" in regards to decision making, - that is handled by the federal government. We still have Governers who act as "Queens Representatives" to handle administrative/symbolic duties - but even they are appointed from within Australia. And the issue of becoming a republic is still very much on the cards - we just need an appropriate time to hold a referendum (last time they held one, the majority may quite likely have voted yes, but for the unfavourable terms under which it was proposed). I can't speak for everyone in Australia, but I think there is general consensus that the monarchy is no longer necessary and that we have more than enough strength to stand alone.

Knowing the general answer to those questions, my point is that you can't really understand the disdain I feel towards Harry and the rest of the Royals.

I mean when something sees Harry wearing a swastika they don't think Austrailia, they think Britain

 

[Amara]

Knowing the general answer to those questions, my point is that you can't really understand the disdain I feel towards Harry and the rest of the Royals.

I mean when something sees Harry wearing a swastika they don't think Austrailia, they think Britain

Ok - wasn't reading all the posts, just saw questions. That's true - Britain does bear the brunt of the royal families' embarrasing antics... (well probably more than the brunt). Despite the formal ties, we can be grateful here that we are far removed from most of it. I'm not convinced that they have any useful role to play in the 21st Century...their role is at best symbolic and serves no function that cannot better be undertaken by others.

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

Ok - wasn't reading all the posts, just saw questions. That's true - Britain does bear the brunt of the royal families' embarrasing antics... (well probably more than the brunt). Despite the formal ties, we can be grateful here that we are far removed from most of it. I'm not convinced that they have any useful role to play in the 21st Century...their role is at best symbolic and serves no function that cannot better be undertaken by others.

Totally agree & BTW, I've got a lot of love for Austrailians but you didn't half fuck us when you gave the world Steve Irwin lol

 

[Hankaveli]

Calling him a "world leader" is a bit of a stretch of the imagination isn't it? Besides, I think even Bush and our Prime Minister, John Howard, would have the common sense and decency to choose a more suitable and sensitive outfit....although, they never cease to surprise me...

well he is a potential world leader.

I will reform my comment, "People in power are generaly idiots"

 

[Amara]

"People in power are generaly idiots"

Yes, I think it's a prerequisite. :thumb:

 

[Amara]

I've got a lot of love for Austrailians but you didn't half fuck us when you gave the world Steve Irwin lol

lol. You have the royals to embarass you, and we have Steve Irwin. I guess it all balances out hey!