Prince Harry the Nazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Amara

New Member
#61
#61
^Maybe they are like the advertisements that came to life on the Simpsons...if we just stop looking at them, they'll go away. No more attention for monarchs and they'll disappear.
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#62
#62
Amara said:
^Maybe they are like the advertisements that came to life on the Simpsons...if we just stop looking at them, they'll go away. No more attention for monarchs and they'll disappear.
Click to expand...
They'd still be recieving their 'wage' for their Royal duties such as waving and..... smoking weed.... offending people worldwide .......molesting their staff and......oh yes, having their wives assasinated
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#63
#63
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
They'd still be recieving their 'wage' for their Royal duties such as waving and..... smoking weed.... offending people worldwide .......molesting their staff and......oh yes, having their wives assasinated
Click to expand...
ex wife ;o)

But anyway..they are basically a tourist attraction..like the zoo.. you can drive down the mall and see them in their natural habitat feeding off all the tax payers (like me) in the UK..
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#65
#65
vg4030 said:
ex wife ;o)

But anyway..they are basically a tourist attraction..like the zoo.. you can drive down the mall and see them in their natural habitat feeding off all the tax payers (like me) in the UK..
Click to expand...
See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.
 
stefanwzyga

stefanwzyga

Well-Known Member
#66
#66
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.
Click to expand...
Ye thats a good idea! spend the cash on houses for the homeless all over the uk!
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#67
#67
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.
Click to expand...
we the public didnt pay for most of the royal jewels... for example the diamond in the crown was TAKEN when they left india ..(after raping the country of course)..

I agree though of course tourists would still come to britain if they werent there.... they are funded by us and should answer to the public more than they do.. they got their wealth and status by murder, incest and robbery..hmm sounds like a good mini series...
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#68
#68
actually.. why not GIVE the star back to india and let them sell it to pay for the victims of the tsunami.. of course they would never sell it but i guess the kind hearfelt words from the queen were enough
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#69
#69
vg4030 said:
we the public didnt pay for most of the royal jewels... for example the diamond in the crown was TAKEN when they left india ..(after raping the country of course)..

I agree though of course tourists would still come to britain if they werent there.... they are funded by us and should answer to the public more than they do.. they got their wealth and status by murder, incest and robbery..hmm sounds like a good mini series...
Click to expand...
When new crowns and shit were wanted, extra taxes were imposed to fund their creation - we pay the taxes so we paid for them.

(Obviously I recognize this hasn't happened in a long time but the fact remains this shit was paid for by the public, so should belong to the public)
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#71
#71
vg4030 said:
how did the public pay for a jewels that were stolen?... did they pay the gas for the getaway car?
Click to expand...
hahaha

Nah man, I think we paid for the workers who did shit like melting down gold and whatever it is they do to jewels to make them a certain shape or size.

BTW, I'm refering to olden times when there was no cars that used gas, as well as more recent times.
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#72
#72
ohh.. they paid for the labour that went into the crown.. i get ya.. so the way i see it.. the value has to be divided into what the UK public paid for and what they took..then it would be fair
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#73
#73
vg4030 said:
ohh.. they paid for the labour that went into the crown.. i get ya.. so the way i see it.. the value has to be divided into what the UK public paid for and what they took..then it would be fair
Click to expand...
OK. If you're saying the jewels and shit were stolen then who ran up in India and snatched them? Not a fucking Royal that's for sure. Soldiers - ordinary men. The shit was then shipped to Britain and yada, yada, yada. Point is, from the beginning to end, the crown jewels creation were funded by the tax (to pay for soldiers, workers) and work of the British people therefore, they belong to the British people.
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#74
#74
lol..i think u got it twisted...

im not saying IF they were stolen..they were stolen from the people of that country
just cos a royal didnt go and personally take them doesnt mean they had nothing to do with it..

do you think if a soldier in iraq took a gold statue from a museum.. that its gonna look right if its displayed in the whitehouse?

Britain wasnt at war with india... they took over it just like they did everything else..when they left, the monarchy took what they wanted and left the people there with jack shit..end of story

the british people didnt pay for shit.. they taxed the country to pay for what thy wanted
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#75
#75
vg4030 said:
lol..i think u got it twisted...

im not saying IF they were stolen..they were stolen from the people of that country
just cos a royal didnt go and personally take them doesnt mean they had nothing to do with it..

do you think if a soldier in iraq took a gold statue from a museum.. that its gonna look right if its displayed in the whitehouse?

Britain wasnt at war with india... they took over it just like they did everything else..when they left, the monarchy took what they wanted and left the people there with jack shit..end of story

the british people didnt pay for shit.. they taxed the country to pay for what thy wanted
Click to expand...
I know we ruled India (and BTW we took most of what we wanted from there long before we were forced to leave) but people still had to be paid to steal that shit, ship that shit and craft that shit and the British people paid for that, once again through taxes or labour (taking over a country).

And once again, a lit of the Royal jewels were made a very long time ago when Britain was without an empire and back then the taxpayer paid for the jewels.



Off subject, what does it mean when it says that I'm subscribed to this thread?
 
vg4030

vg4030

Well-Known Member
#76
#76
we're obviously talking about 2 diffrent times here...when u left india is when you took the diamond.. no one had to paid to steal it..as u ruled the country why would you?..and the british people didnt pay for it..for the last time.. half the crown wasnt even made in the UK... where were the best skilled gold smiths and diamond cutters..in London??

if your talking about medieval times..then thats different..
 
C

CalcuoCuchicheo

Little Miss Vixen
#77
#77
vg4030 said:
we're obviously talking about 2 diffrent times here...when u left india is when you took the diamond.. no one had to paid to steal it..as u ruled the country why would you?..and the british people didnt pay for it..for the last time.. half the crown wasnt even made in this country...

if your talking about medieval times..then thats different..
Click to expand...
I know they don't pay the Indian people but our soldiers need to get paid for maintaining control of the country, the jewels have to be shipped to Britain and the they have to be crafted. There is much of the taxpayer's money involved in the process.

Do you know anything about what I asked at the end of my last post?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 162 (members: 1, guests: 161)
Top