Got any Pro Tools questions? Post em here.

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#41
Thats what you want right?
yeah i do but but not with reason..not with FL either or cubase or any of those...i want to find out what they used in the 'olden days'....back before they even had reason...they had to have used something else......

the whole idea of using reason makes everything seem so 'congested' when i think about using it with pro-tools...

i want to be fully dependent on pro-tools..seeing how important it is and how widely its used by pretty much everyone...

i guess another way to arrange note-by-note on pro-tools would be recording each note of a keyboard or guitar or whatever instrument your using..and then just arranging it on pro-tools? which would take forever.....but worth it if there isnt any other way...
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#42
yeah i do but but not with reason..not with FL either or cubase or any of those...i want to find out what they used in the 'olden days'....back before they even had reason...they had to have used something else......

the whole idea of using reason makes everything seem so 'congested' when i think about using it with pro-tools...

i want to be fully dependent on pro-tools..seeing how important it is and how widely its used by pretty much everyone...

i guess another way to arrange note-by-note on pro-tools would be recording each note of a keyboard or guitar or whatever instrument your using..and then just arranging it on pro-tools? which would take forever.....but worth it if there isnt any other way...

In the "olden days" they didnt have Pro Tools and tracked directly to DAT tapes and mixed on hardware.

When they developed Pro Tools, they developed Reason.

What you're asking for, doesnt exist.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#43
In the "olden days" they didnt have Pro Tools and tracked directly to DAT tapes and mixed on hardware.

When they developed Pro Tools, they developed Reason.

What you're asking for, doesnt exist.
there has to be something im sure im not the only one who feels like this (or maybe i am lol)..there has to be other pro-tool users that want this too i cant be the only one..

hmmm...

edit: i guess ill just have to get used to using reason if worse comes to worse...
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#44
there has to be something im sure im not the only one who feels like this (or maybe i am lol)..there has to be other pro-tool users that want this too i cant be the only one..

hmmm...

edit: i guess ill just have to get used to using reason if worse comes to worse...
You could track the samples and sounds manually and then use about 50 other RTAS plug ins to do what Reason does.

Up to you. I dont understand why youre so dead set against using it.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#45
You could track the samples and sounds manually and then use about 50 other RTAS plug ins to do what Reason does.

Up to you. I dont understand why youre so dead set against using it.
what do you mean when you say "track the samples and sounds manually"?


well, i do have my mind set on using pro-tools software in a way thats useful to me. right now pro-tools really does seam useless to me. i guess i feel like that because i've pretty much mastered using FL besides for two techniqes (that im aware of) which im still getting a strong grasp of... one is getting a a better understanding on pitch change. another is being able to keep a steady tempo through part of a song, and then change it to a higher or lower tempo...and another thing might be training myself so that i can hear every instrument in a song..every note...and beable to duplicate it exactly the way it is..because thats what a proffesional music producer does and thats a skill to be learned (imo)..

to my understanding, when someone told me that its really not what you use, but how you use it, that really stuck with me...and ive learned that..and ive done my research, looked for loop holes in music software that ive been using and ive again proved to myself that its not what you use, its how you use it because if i could make music thats as good as a music producer with alot of experience who usespro-tools, then thats where i see pro-tools useless..i don't know....but i do want to learn it for the fact that anyone with pro tools certification is more likely to get better career opportunities and i think thats where its going to help me get where i want with the music industry.

i consider myself to want the same respect as David Copperfield the famous magician because like david copperfield i have tricks that i use when i produce music, and i dont think anyone out of their mind would go and ask david copperfield how he performed one of his big magic tricks so i'd like to think to give myself the same respect.

u know what..maybe i do have something against using reason..ive used it a bunch of times and its not the arranging or mixing or anything like that which bothers me...its mainly finding everything in that software which is annoying...

just from asking questions, and researching ive learned alot of things and one of the things ive learned is that i cant master on a proffesional level. puffnscruff said that before and he was right and i was wrong. ive noticed how on a mastered track ripped from a cd (in .wav or 320kbit) how the levels are pretty much perfect, how everything is maintained to a perfect or close to perfect volume. but just because i was wrong about saying i couldn't master doesn't mean that its not possible to master accurately in software like sony acid pro (thats if u know exactly what ur doing)..

i think my problem is i need to look at exactly where i want to go with pro-tools....i need to figure out a way thats best for me....even if i do run into some loop holes... one of my career goals is to work with a professional recording artist, who is maybe signed to a record label, this is how i can start my mark with the music industry.
 

Bigg Limn

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#48
Damn...cuz my boi has a M-Power ProTools version for the MBox 2 mini...it didnt work....Im guessin its just for the Mbox mini lol...I hate Protools they get 2 damn complicated
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#49
Damn...cuz my boi has a M-Power ProTools version for the MBox 2 mini...it didnt work....Im guessin its just for the Mbox mini lol...I hate Protools they get 2 damn complicated

The Mbox 2 mini runs Pro Tools LE. Any digidesign hardware runs either Pro Tools LE or HD depending on what it is. All Mbox's run Pro Tools LE.

M Powers is for M-Audio devices.
 

Bigg Limn

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#50
Aite ya dat makes sense, grazi...Iunno why da fuck I keep thinkin M-Audio and Digi R the same when I know they the not...same thing happened when I was lookin 4 Mbox drivers...went 2 m-audio.com @ first lol...its that damn 'm'
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#51
Aite ya dat makes sense, grazi...Iunno why da fuck I keep thinkin M-Audio and Digi R the same when I know they the not...same thing happened when I was lookin 4 Mbox drivers...went 2 m-audio.com @ first lol...its that damn 'm'
LOL.

You still using MPowered?
 

Bigg Limn

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#52
lol @ the dumbness... I thot this was a recent post @ first Im like wtf I dont remember typing that lol

Ya Im still on M-Powered...actually wasnt using Pro-Tools at all until June this year. Up until then I was on faggot ass Cool Edit Pro [altho much thanks 4 it keeping me in record status].
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#55
Nah, the Digi hardware unless you go HD sucks. Terrible convertors. Look into going M-Audio Profire series. Great pres (if you use them, I have external Neve pre) and great convertors (which is where the Digi products suffer).
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

Top