Technology Android

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
HTC confirmed JB update for One X, One S and XL. Asus confirmed for Transformer Prime and (I think) original Transformer and Eee Slider.
 

THEV1LL4N

Well-Known Member
Just a thought.

Are all these features found on the Samsung Galaxy S3 due to TouchWiz? They will probably not be featured on the Nexus version of the SGS3 that Samsung will release for Android 4.1 JB. For example, the video transmission (S-Video I think it's called). Also, I like the idea of Smart Stay, S-Beam (I think is meant to be faster than Android Beam), Pop-Up Play, and Best Photo.

Any thoughts on this?

Edit: It is not called S-Video. It is called AllShare Play.

However, we should get Google Now instead of S-Voice (which i've only really heard negative reviews about).
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
None of the Galaxy S3 exclusive software features is worth using them. None of them are better than apps meant to do the same thing or more that are available on the market. Apart from safe stay which doesn't work well on the SGS3 and uses up the battery real quick. The S-Voice app was the only one that really worked but now there's Google Now.

It's a good phone hardware-wise, but the first thing I'd do would be getting rid of Samsung's software from it as the phone contains more bloatware than your average Android phone. Mnufacturer-installed software features are rarely useful and it's almost never anything better than third party app.
 

Pittsey

Knock, Knock...
Staff member
It's a good phone hardware-wise, but the first thing I'd do would be getting rid of Samsung's software from it as the phone contains more bloatware than your average Android phone. Mnufacturer-installed software features are rarely useful and it's almost never anything better than third party app.
Also the first thing I did.
 

THEV1LL4N

Well-Known Member
My friend at work asked me for advice on new phones and I said to get the SGS3 or the HTC One S. He likes the SGS3 but the size is too big for his liking. So I said the next best one is the One S. Now everyone who sits around him at work are all adamant about the iPhone 4S and are making up things about Android (i.e. that its difficult to use and not many people have the SGS3) lol.

So this could go either way. This girl said she's never seen an iphone with a broken screen.

I don't think they even understand what Android is.

I will send him that video where the guy compares the iPhone with the Galaxy Nexus. and the Google Now one, probably Google Chrome for Android one as well.

Any other short videos I can send.

This guy wants a good deal. I'd say the 4S which is nearly a year old is just as expensive as the SGS3 and more expensive than the One S. This guy is gonna get peer pressured into buying the iphone. At the end of the day, its his choice.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
A friend asked me the other day whether she should get an iPhone and I told her to get the S3. Just heard back from her, she did get one and she's in love with it :)
 

Pittsey

Knock, Knock...
Staff member
The S3 is definitely an iphone killer. It's also very easy for the iphone user to adjust to.

But...

I hate the customisations, I think they are ugly as fuck. I prefer the ICS dock, although I am using HOLO launcher with the 7 app dock.
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
HTC sells half of its stake in Beats Audio less than a year after initial investment

By Daniel Bader on July 23, 2012 at 9:39am in Mobile News
We were pretty shocked when HTC announced it was purchasing a 50.1% stake in Beats Audio; the two companies never seemed to have much in common aside from their digital upbringings. It’s been almost a year since that unlikely pairing and the Taiwanese giant is announcing it has sold 25% of its stake back to Beats itself for $150 million, losing essentially nothing on the initially investment.
This is a strange move for HTC, but something likely necessary to pad out the black ink on the ledger; they barely made a profit this last quarter and are focusing more closely on their core business, namely making great phones.
There’s no indication from this sale that HTC will stop including Beats Audio in its Sense Android software — the One series and the new Desire C come pre-loaded with Beats Audio sound profiles — and Beats promises continued mobile exclusivity for HTC. The two companies will continue to collaborate on future products, so to the average consumer this news will likely change nothing.
Source: Reuters

Not surprised really...
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
I'm really looking forward to those Little Big chips from ARM. For some reason while I think A15 will be great I'm especially excited about A7 architecture. That's always where I though mobile chips should go.
Picture mobile SOCs 1/5 the size of A8/A9, a few times more energy efficient and slightly faster. That means you can get an A7-powered device that will be faster than the SGS2 while using only a small fraction of energy the SGS2 would use to perform the same tasks.
You could power a low-end device with a 500mAh battery that would last for a week granted you wouldn't use a huge LCD.
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 to come with 2GB, phone capabilities?

By Daniel Bader on July 24, 2012 at 9:39am in Mobile News
A recent unboxing of the upcoming Galaxy Note 10.1 — which could be released in August — reveals that Samsung did to the tablet what they did to the North American version of the Galaxy S III: add 2GB of RAM to the spec sheet. This future-proofing technique will make it easier for users to take advantage of those PC-like multitasking capabilities we have yet to see in action.
As expected, the Note 10.1 also comes with a 1.4Ghz quad-core SoC, likely the same one that’s inside the international Galaxy S III, as well as a 5MP back camera and, in some cases, HSPA+ support. We’d expect the North American carrier-released version to be LTE-capable, but that will have to wait until later this year.

One potentially disappointing aspect of the Note 10.1 is the 1280×800 resolution screen. We’ve been spoiled with the recent crop of 1920×1200 Android tablets like the Asus Transformer Pad Infinity — and of course the new iPad — so anything less than full HD on a 10.1-inch screen just seems boring. The Note 10.1 also looks to come with a massive 7000mAh battery and an IR blaster alongside the requisite WiFi/Bluetooth/GPS support.
The back of the tablet, like the front, looks almost identical to the Galaxy Tab 2 recently released in Canada. But you can clearly see the slot for the S Pen, which will be the major differentiating feature of the tablet. And though it may not make it over to our shores, it looks like the Note 10.1 can act as either a passthrough for your smartphone or will be able to make calls on its own, much like some variants of the original Galaxy Tab.
Source: Brave Post
Via: The Verge
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
To be honest it's nothing new nor worth getting over last gen's tablets. I think Asus last year's tablets are at least as good.

Buying a tablet right at this very moment I'd be stuck between the Ipad 2 or Nexus 7. I'm looking forward to the rumored mini iPad and a bigger Nexus tablet.
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
Samsung: Apple wouldn’t have sold a single iPhone without stealing our tech

By: Zach Epstein | Jul 25th, 2012 at 10:30AM
Filed Under: Legal


Another day, another Apple (AAPL) vs. Samsung (005930) trial. The two consumer electronics companies are preparing to do battle in San Jose, California next week, and now-public court documents shed light on the positions each firm is taking. On Tuesday, Apple told Samsung exactly what it thinks its technology patents are worth (spoiler: barely anything at all), and subsequent filings from Samsung reveal that the South Korea-based company has a few choice words for Apple as well.
As highlighted by The Wall Street Journal, Samsung’s trial brief pulls no punches in telling the court exactly where it stands regarding Apple’s repeated patent-related accusations. In short, Apple is the thief here, not Samsung. A few key excerpts (emphasis is ours):

Samsung has been researching and developing mobile telecommunications technology since at least as early as 1991 and invented much of the technology for today‘s smartphones. Indeed, Apple, which sold its first iPhone nearly twenty years after Samsung started developing mobile phone technology, could not have sold a single iPhone without the benefit of Samsung‘s patented technology.

For good measure, Apple seeks to exclude Samsung from the market, based on its complaints that Samsung has used the very same public domain design concepts that Apple borrowed from other competitors, including Sony, to develop the iPhone. Apple‘s own internal documents show this. In February 2006, before the claimed iPhone design was conceived of, Apple executive Tony Fadell circulated a news article that contained an interview of a Sony designer to Steve Jobs, Jonathan Ive and others. In the article, the Sony designer discussed Sony portable electronic device designs that lacked “excessive ornamentation” such as buttons, fit in the hand, were “square with a screen” and had “corners [which] have been rounded out.”

Contrary to the image it has cultivated in the popular press, Apple has admitted in internal documents that its strength is not in developing new technologies first, but in successfully commercializing them. . . . Also contrary to Apple‘s accusations, Samsung does not need or want to copy; rather, it strives to best the competition by developing multiple, unique products. Samsung internal documents from 2006, well before the iPhone was announced, show rectangular phones with rounded corners, large displays, flat front faces, and graphic interfaces with icons with grid layouts.

Apple relied heavily on Samsung‘s technology to enter the telecommunications space, and it continues to use Samsung‘s technology to this day in its iPhone and iPad products. For example, Samsung supplies the flash memory, main memory, and application processor for the iPhone. . . . But Apple also uses patented Samsung technology that it has not paid for. This includes standards-essential technology required for Apple‘s products to interact with products from other manufacturers, and several device features that Samsung developed for use in its products.

It’s clear that we’re in for yet another action-packed adventure when the trial kicks off next week.
Tags: Apple, patents, Samsung

------

Quite the pissing contest going on.​
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

Top