the one thing that really pisses me off when these so called football experts start ranting on is some of the ridiculous shit they come out with. Like yesterday when Ray Houghton was talking about Van Persie and how he is a big loss for Arsenal. Then he went on to criticise Wenger for not having an effective replacement. He wondered why Arsenal dont have "a like for like". I also hear this same bullshit argument when they discuss Liverpool's squad and how we dont have a top replacement for Torres when he is injured. Heres some reasons you fucking dumbasses:
1. The like of Torres and RVP are pretty much irreplaceable. They are two of the best in the world atm. Any player that is good enough is already at a big club. The only way is to find to find a good youngster, give them chances and they may become a top player. In fairness, Wegner is doing this and so is Benitez with David N''Gog.
2. How the hell could you have a like for like in your squad? lets say Arsenal still have Adeboyor and Wenger favours RVP to play upfront in the current set up they have, do you think a striker of Adeboyor's calibre will be happy to be RVP's replacement. I highly doubt it. Same with Liverpool. Lets say that we have, for the sake of this argument, David Villa in our squad. With the formation liverpool plays, we would have either Torres or Villa to play up front with Gerrard behind them. Do you think Villa would be happy sitting on the bench as Torres's replacement or vice versa? no way. Even players like Keane or Crouch who are not as good as Villa were unhappy with that situation. They both left because of it.
I really wish these idiots that get paid to talk about football would use their brain before spouting off this kind of rubbish.