Non-Urban Music R. Kelly ACQUITTED!

roaches

Well-Known Member
#1
R. Kelly verdict: R. Kelly acquitted on all counts -- chicagotribune.com

chicagotribune.com
R. Kelly acquitted
By Stacy St. Clair

Tribune reporter

2:12 PM CDT, June 13, 2008

A Cook County jury on Friday acquitted R&B superstar R. Kelly of child pornography charges, marking the end of a high-profile trial rich in courtroom drama and celebrity intrigue.

The 41-year-old singer, whose real name is Robert Kelly, long denied charges that he videotaped himself engaging in a variety of sex acts with his then-underage goddaughter. Authorities said the female in the video could have been as young as 13 at the time.

The jury of nine men and three women deliberated for 7 ½ hours before finding Kelly not guilty on all 14 counts.

The verdict ends a bizarre case that had languished for nearly six years. During almost four weeks of testimony, the jury heard about three-person sexual encounters and watched a sex tape in which the male participant is seen urinating on a female.

Neither the alleged victim, now 23, nor her parents testified during the trial. All three denied her involvement in the tape to a grand jury in 2002.

Without their cooperation, the prosecution used other witnesses to describe the relationship Kelly shared with his goddaughter--an aspiring rapper who witnesses said became a member of his entourage while in junior high school. She often visited him at his downtown recording studio or watched him play basketball at a West Side gym, they testified.

Only one witness testified to having direct knowledge of an inappropriate relationship between Kelly and the alleged victim. Lisa Van Allen told the jury she engaged in a series of sexual encounters with the singer and his goddaughter when the girl was a minor.

The defense tried to undermine Van Allen's testimony by accusing her of concocting the story to extort money from Kelly. Van Allen, who lives in Georgia, called prosecutors with information about the case shortly after her fiance was arrested on guns and weapons charges.

Kelly's attorneys contended the young woman in the tape is not the alleged victim but a prostitute. They called three family members of the alleged victim who testified that they saw no resemblance between their relative and the female in the video.

Kelly also did not testify. Without testimony from him or his alleged victim, the singer's attorneys built their case around a caterpillar-shape mole along his spine. They argued that the man in the recording has an unblemished back, meaning Kelly couldn't be the man in the video.

If you don't see the mole, the defense told the jury, then Kelly cannot be convicted.

Kelly's attorneys also suggested the 27-minute tape had been doctored, going so far as to say someone could have edited the singer's head onto another man's body. A prosecution expert testified such editing trickery would take 44 years and still would be obvious to viewers.

The drawn-out legal battle has not slowed Kelly's music career. He has released five albums and a greatest-hits collection since he was indicted in 2002. He also has completed several concert tours.

=====

Excellent news, I think. If Michael Jackson and Roman Polanski are walking free for raping children, there's no way R. Kelly should go to jail for a consensual sex act, especially one the alleged victim denies being part of.

I can't wait to hear his next album.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#4
you don't think adults that have sex with teenagers should go to jail?

and lol at kelly's attorney saying someone put his head on the body
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#5
R. Kelly verdict: R. Kelly acquitted on all counts -- chicagotribune.com

chicagotribune.com
R. Kelly acquitted
By Stacy St. Clair

Tribune reporter

2:12 PM CDT, June 13, 2008

A Cook County jury on Friday acquitted R&B superstar R. Kelly of child pornography charges, marking the end of a high-profile trial rich in courtroom drama and celebrity intrigue.

The 41-year-old singer, whose real name is Robert Kelly, long denied charges that he videotaped himself engaging in a variety of sex acts with his then-underage goddaughter. Authorities said the female in the video could have been as young as 13 at the time.

The jury of nine men and three women deliberated for 7 ½ hours before finding Kelly not guilty on all 14 counts.

The verdict ends a bizarre case that had languished for nearly six years. During almost four weeks of testimony, the jury heard about three-person sexual encounters and watched a sex tape in which the male participant is seen urinating on a female.

Neither the alleged victim, now 23, nor her parents testified during the trial. All three denied her involvement in the tape to a grand jury in 2002.

Without their cooperation, the prosecution used other witnesses to describe the relationship Kelly shared with his goddaughter--an aspiring rapper who witnesses said became a member of his entourage while in junior high school. She often visited him at his downtown recording studio or watched him play basketball at a West Side gym, they testified.

Only one witness testified to having direct knowledge of an inappropriate relationship between Kelly and the alleged victim. Lisa Van Allen told the jury she engaged in a series of sexual encounters with the singer and his goddaughter when the girl was a minor.

The defense tried to undermine Van Allen's testimony by accusing her of concocting the story to extort money from Kelly. Van Allen, who lives in Georgia, called prosecutors with information about the case shortly after her fiance was arrested on guns and weapons charges.

Kelly's attorneys contended the young woman in the tape is not the alleged victim but a prostitute. They called three family members of the alleged victim who testified that they saw no resemblance between their relative and the female in the video.

Kelly also did not testify. Without testimony from him or his alleged victim, the singer's attorneys built their case around a caterpillar-shape mole along his spine. They argued that the man in the recording has an unblemished back, meaning Kelly couldn't be the man in the video.

If you don't see the mole, the defense told the jury, then Kelly cannot be convicted.

Kelly's attorneys also suggested the 27-minute tape had been doctored, going so far as to say someone could have edited the singer's head onto another man's body. A prosecution expert testified such editing trickery would take 44 years and still would be obvious to viewers.

The drawn-out legal battle has not slowed Kelly's music career. He has released five albums and a greatest-hits collection since he was indicted in 2002. He also has completed several concert tours.

=====

Excellent news, I think. If Michael Jackson and Roman Polanski are walking free for raping children, there's no way R. Kelly should go to jail for a consensual sex act, especially one the alleged victim denies being part of.

I can't wait to hear his next album.
Polanski wouldn't be walking free in America.
 

FroDawgg

Well-Known Member
#6
R. Kelly innocent...

Who didn't see that one coming? I thought the prosecution had it locked (from what I had heard).

Something smells fishy...
 
#9
Now for a joke Rahim would make:

"I guess this means he's no longer trapped in the closet"


But seriously, he'll probably make a record about how he's reborn and all this other shit. It was him on the tape.
 

THEV1LL4N

Well-Known Member
#10
Now for a joke Rahim would make:

"I guess this means he's no longer trapped in the closet"


But seriously, he'll probably make a record about how he's reborn and all this other shit. It was him on the tape.
yea maybe an appology song like akon.

"im sorry for the fact that she was underage. how was i supposed to know? her parents shouldnt have let her out her home".
 

roaches

Well-Known Member
#12
Incidentally, today was the last day of school in a bunch of places, too.

Michael Jackson was found not guilty exactly three years ago, too.
 
#20
Casey Rain said:
And a good thing too, because Michael wasn't guilty.
comments like this make me laugh. you believe he didn't do it but you can't say he wasn't guilty. you weren't there yet you speak with the air of someone who was a witness and can be 100% sure of his innocence. no one other than Michael and the kids in question can be sure what happened, so for you or anyone else for that matter to just say he wasn't guilty like it's a fact is just silly. whether he did it or not, none of us will know. the jury found him not guilty, but that doesn't mean he didn't do it.

as for R. Kelly, LOL. first he tried to say it wasn't him on the tape, it was his brother. then his lawyers argue someone could have pasted his head on the body, which as far as i'm concerned is their acknowledgement that it is him you see on the tape. and yet somehow he's still found not guilty. it's beyond belief.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top