Film & TV Good Luck Chuck

#21
I meant recently. With the current state that movies are in.

So from the recenter ones that you mention, Titanic was all about Leo and James Cameron, it's not like whats he name carried the movie. Charlies Angels tanked. The second Bridget Jones tanked, as did the second recent Miss Congeniality.
Titanic made a billion, the story revolves around a woman. What more do you want?

Do you know what your talking about? Charlie's Angels made 250 million. Bridget Jones 2 made 262mill. Miss Congeniality made 2 100mill. Because you don't like a movie, don't mean it tanked, hate to break it to ya.

As for Jolie, Mr & Mrs Smith made umm 427mill.

Really do some research because your looking like an idiot. :(
 

DarkPhantom13

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#22
And really who gives a shit about made for bitch movies? Titanic sold so fuckin much because of Leo and the huge marketing that went along with the fuckin movie. Although Mr. and Mrs Smith was a success you neglect the fact that Brad Pitt was in it and it was also a remake of an old movie. The point that Rukas was making was that movies that star a solo female actor as the selling point have tanked in the last few years.
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#23
Titanic made a billion, the story revolves around a woman. What more do you want?

Do you know what your talking about? Charlie's Angels made 250 million. Bridget Jones 2 made 262mill. Miss Congeniality made 2 100mill. Because you don't like a movie, don't mean it tanked, hate to break it to ya.

As for Jolie, Mr & Mrs Smith made umm 427mill.

Really do some research because your looking like an idiot. :(
No, you're being a complete idiot not me.

Firstly, stop naming movies that fall outside of the criteria I stated, which is RECENT movies with a LEAD ACTRESS.

Titanic made cake because a) It was James Cameron, b) it had huge special effects and c) the girls went there to see Leo. Kate Winslet was not the sole star of Titanic, she did not have to carry the movie all on her own. And to be honest that movie would have made the money regardless of which female was in that role because she had nothing to do with putting asses into seats, the big ship did, Cameron did, and Leo did.

Charlies Angels had three women, once again, one women did not have to carry the film on her own, and it is not recent. Charlies Angels 2 cost about 120million to make and made about 100million at the box office. That is a flop. Didnt you ever stop to think why there was no number 3?

Miss Congeniality 2 made 50 million and cost 60 million. Once again, no number 3? Why? Because the studios considered it a flop.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith had Brad Pitt. Jolie did not have to carry the movie on her own.

Do you even understand what the fuck is being discussed? Women carrying films on their own.

Thank you to Dark Phantom, at least SOMEBODY understands.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top