^A lot of people would take a Tucker Max book over most works of Shakespeare, but that doesn't speak to the quality of the books. It speaks to the lameness of the readers.
^A lot of people would take a Tucker Max book over most works of Shakespeare, but that doesn't speak to the quality of the books. It speaks to the lameness of the readers.
Like, his actual book? Wow. I read like, two or three of his articles and found them fairly amusing, but not enough to want to read his fucking books and shit. Damn son.
Anyway it's hardly a good comparison. Tucker Max does not create fictional literary art.
Puzo and Shakespeare and Tolstoy all did. It's like comparing The Green Mile to South Park.
I read The Godfather for the first time earlier this year, on the advice of my mother who is a huge Puzo fan and whose taste I generally trust. I just don't enjoy his writing. Good storytelling is different from good writing. Also I suspect that you perhaps read it as a younger guy, and that's the difference here. But again, just a matter of taste.
It is a matter of opinion though. If Ristol didn't enjoy the first book he read, I'm sure he wasn't super keen to read another. Doesn't mean Puzo IS a dogshit writer, just that Ristol doesn't like his style.