World Cup 2006

Yup it is, alot of teams havent played well in their first game, i think people were expecting alot of Brazil, but like the rest of the fancied nations they will get better.
 
ThUg $TyLe said:
Yup it is, alot of teams havent played well in their first game, i think people were expecting alot of Brazil, but like the rest of the fancied nations they will get better.

Yeah first games were really surprising. Brazilians make many mistakes
 
^
lol

Ronaldo is such a shitty player. He just walks over the pitch, has like 10 ball contacts in 60 minutes......lame.
 
beReal said:
^
lol

Ronaldo is such a shitty player. He just walks over the pitch, has like 10 ball contacts in 60 minutes......lame.

He can play good if he wants. But in this match he fucked up.
 
masta247 said:
I can't stand France anyway.

Damn Brazil was playing much too passive. They treat croatians like some kids they havin fun with. Plus theyre too lazy


what are you crazy or some shit??? Croatians pressed Brazil like hell...

Tudor (#5) was half-marking Ronaldinho during the whole game. Everytime Brazil went in attack, Tudor blocked Ronaldinho (it was foulesque, but he didn't have the ball, so no foul)

I liked this game a lot. Croatia played great IMO. Had some chances, but then again, you are playing Brazil.


Whoever expected a 5-0 win, you are a bunch of fuckers. Stop understimating teams from the Balkans, they are better than you think. :thumb:
 
Well done, Zilians. Croats played well, though. They attacked and didnt give the Zilians much room, but then agian, they only need one chance to score.

Croats lacked the finishing touch up front. Very frustrating to watch. Prso played well, even though he lacked the finishing touch as well. Ronaldo was shit, Adriano was invisible. Ronaldhino and Kaka played well.
 
beReal said:
^
lol

Ronaldo is such a shitty player. He just walks over the pitch, has like 10 ball contacts in 60 minutes......lame.

What about Adriano? alot will be made of Ronaldo's poor performance, Adriano didn't do much better either.

Plus Ronaldo had a decent shot from outside the area..while Adriano missed from 6 yards out.
 
ThUg $TyLe said:
How Hizzle ran onto the pitch.

Yes indeed. I started a run a la Forrest Gump from Canada to Germany, and Berlin's stadium was on my way.


But the Croatian fans were fucking great tonight... they sang during the whole second half.
 
Duke said:
Well done, Zilians. Croats played well, though. They attacked and didnt give the Zilians much room, but then agian, they only need one chance to score.

Croats lacked the finishing touch up front. Very frustrating to watch. Prso played well, even though he lacked the finishing touch as well. Ronaldo was shit, Adriano was invisible. Ronaldhino and Kaka played well.


Ronaldinho played well under the circomstences that he was definitly going to be covered cuz he's their best playmaker (then again, in Brazil, the keeper is a playmaker)

The biggest problem in Croatia's game was #19, Kranjcar, he is too slow for this level. He is 19 yes, but he lacks pace way too much.
 
Yes Croatians played well but Brazilians if they would play on 100% it could be 5-0. They were playing really easy on croatians. Croatians were playing really agressive n Brazilians were passive. Croatians made many good actions butnone of them were good enought. Brazilians havent had many good situations but easily scored. They made many mistakes, it was easy to see that they were just "playing" with croatians.
 
how hizzle? said:
Ronaldinho played well under the circomstences that he was definitly going to be covered cuz he's their best playmaker (then again, in Brazil, the keeper is a playmaker)

The biggest problem in Croatia's game was #19, Kranjcar, he is too slow for this level. He is 19 yes, but he lacks pace way too much.

Yeah the Croats did really well reigning Brazil in. It's Brazil's quality that they can keep up the good field play and attack despite the direct pressure. Made for an interesting game with momentum swinging to both sides. IMO, best game I've seen so far along with Argies - Ivory C.


Yes Croatians played well but Brazilians if they would play on 100% it could be 5-0. They were playing really easy on croatians. Croatians were playing really agressive n Brazilians were passive. Croatians made many good actions butnone of them were good enought. Brazilians havent had many good situations but easily scored. They made many mistakes, it was easy to see that they were just "playing" with croatians.
_________________

Uhm, no. They werent playing easy on the Croats, they Croats forced them to slow down. Big difference.
 
arabic187 said:
anybody care to explain the meaning of pace?

The speed of the play, being able to keep up with a fast pace. Being able to switch quickly between attacking and defending (ie having ball posession or not).

If you lack pace, it means the player is physically and/or mentally (too) slow on the pitch.
 
masta247 said:
Yes Croatians played well but Brazilians if they would play on 100% it could be 5-0. They were playing really easy on croatians. Croatians were playing really agressive n Brazilians were passive. Croatians made many good actions butnone of them were good enought. Brazilians havent had many good situations but easily scored. They made many mistakes, it was easy to see that they were just "playing" with croatians.


what?? they weren't playing with Croatians, the Cros fucking pressed the whole 90 minutes...



Pace is basicly speed and acceleration.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.