I think they're just playing up the conspiracy theories. It could have been Suge, so you can't convict beyond a reasonable doubt. They probably won't mention Diddy as that'll skate too close to Zip and the truth, but they'll just throw doubt on what happened.
The problem is the prosecution really doesn't have any evidence, there's no smoking gun other than what Keefe D himself has said. So if the defence can just say that he made it up to profit, and there's enough evidence to suggest it could have been someone else... He will walk.
The problem is the prosecution really doesn't have any evidence, there's no smoking gun other than what Keefe D himself has said. So if the defence can just say that he made it up to profit, and there's enough evidence to suggest it could have been someone else... He will walk.
