Tiger kills Kansas teen for taking a picture

Rukas said:
Keep laughing. The animal WASNT wild. The animal was TRAINED. Its not like she went to Africa stood next to a tiger and got eaten. That would be stupid. But she didnt do that, she went to a national park who's business it is to have people pose next to their animals. This is what they are TRAINED to do. The tiger WAS NOT wild.

Worst analogy EVER. The animal was trained. That was its purpose, she did what she was SUPPOSED to do and what she probably PAID to do.

No, its NOT. Its a TRAINED animal. Dogs can be viscious and deadly too, should people not take photos with them?
Rukas, Trained or not... its still a fucking tiger. Trained dogs turn against there masters... especially dobermans

its a living, breathing warm blooded animal.. just like humans... whats the difference between this tiger being trained to do something and then turning on its master and a navy seal being trained by the united states and going ROGUE?.. there is no difference

it has a brain.. its not a puppet.. you cant just let em collect dust then decide your gonna play with it one day

those trainers use rough tactics to get animals to do what they want anyways.. beatings...that shits just a lower version of human slavery lol

it was only a matter of time
 
I got scratched on the face by a tiger once, it was like a little little one, i could of took it so i dont care, a cub or whatever you call it. Even that one they gave drugs and shit to calm it down, so people can go pet them or what not. They had the big tiger and peole were taking pictures with it and feeding it with a bottle and shit and they got the picture taken, and since the little bastard scratched me i wasn't about to go with the big one, I aint that stupid (no pun intended). But i mean the tiger had to be on some sort of drug, i am kind of curious to why it attacked. The little that "attacked" me was my fault cus i treated it like a dog and started playing tug of war with it with a little chew toy, yeah im a dumbass. But i think it had to be provoked, why would the tiger just trip, especially on those drugs that practically put it to sleep.
 
FrOgStRaDaMuS said:
Rukas, Trained or not... its still a fucking tiger. Trained dogs turn against there masters... especially dobermans

its a living, breathing warm blooded animal.. just like humans... whats the difference between this tiger being trained to do something and then turning on its master and a navy seal being trained by the united states and going ROGUE?.. there is no difference

it has a brain.. its not a puppet.. you cant just let em collect dust then decide your gonna play with it one day

those trainers use rough tactics to get animals to do what they want anyways.. beatings...that shits just a lower version of human slavery lol

it was only a matter of time


So what the fuck are you saying? Before you said the girl should have known better; so if its like a trained doberman are you saying people shouldnt stand next to dobermans or other dogs that may attack? (Thats all of them.)

And your Navy Seal analogy, a soldier going rouge is at fault, like you said, there is no difference, it is the soldiers fault, not his victims. It has a brain, therefore its the tigers fault, not the girls.
 
Rukas said:
So what the fuck are you saying? Before you said the girl should have known better; so if its like a trained doberman are you saying people shouldnt stand next to dobermans or other dogs that may attack? (Thats all of them.)

And your Navy Seal analogy, a soldier going rouge is at fault, like you said, there is no difference, it is the soldiers fault, not his victims. It has a brain, therefore its the tigers fault, not the girls.
No... what im saying is exactly what i said... Its a FUCKING TIGER!!!!


like i said it wasnt the girls fault... nor the tigers.. but it is a tiger.. plain and simple.. fuck all the analogys i made.. trained or not, its still a tiger and there is no fucking way you could pay me to take a picture with a tiger (although its my favorite animal) with 1 man with one fucking chain around his neck...
 
C.R.Y. said:
what the fuck did they expect, for the tiger to hug her?? of course the fucking tiger was going to do something. its called a predator for a reason. its reasons like this that i say fuck the government. thats like leaving a child with a child molestor when you know about his history. and she shouldve known theres a risk when you sit next to something wild like that.

why bring the government into this thread?lol

C.R.Y. said:
even if theres trainers there, theres always going to be that chance that the motherfucker will bite you. i couldnt give less of a fuck is someone trained a tiger, i wouldnt stand next to it. because i know the consequences of what would happen if it snapped on me.

there u go. there is alaways a risk because trained or not, the animal remains a tiger. therefore its the girls fault period
 
Duke said:
Goddamn motherfuckers. Why did they have to kill the tiger? What the fuck do they expect? Its a goddamn wild animal and a big predator, not a pet. Christ, when do people get that through their thick skulls?

:thumb:
 
Skillz said:
Was it trained by choice, Rukas? No, it wasn't. Enough said.

Skillz


Is it the choice of any animal to be trained? Cat? Dog? Should we not be photographed with them or have them in our home? Enough said.
 
S O F I S T I K said:
So, if it's a trained animal, why do you think it bit the girl?


They dont know. Thats why they killed it, so a) it wouldnt happen again, and b) they could perform tests on it to see if it was sick, mental, abused, etc etc.
 
Sick? A man that buys a Ak47 and goes berserk in a mall is sick. A Tiger that follows his instincts isn't sick.
 
Like Chris Rock said, that tiger didnt go crazy that tiger went tiger!
Anyway the way I see this is the girl should have known the risk's of taking the photo and been aware that anything could happen, as the article said the owner clearly stated that. It was her decision to go in there and it may not be her fault for I'd think she didnt provoke it but hey thats what happens when you have an animal thats natural instinct is to protect and kill. I dont beleive in killing animals out of pure revenge and this Tiger should have never been used again in this way, but perhaps given limited to no contact with humans unless heavily sedated. Its like here recently, in Queensland a man got taken by a crocodile while fishing and the authorities went out on a search and destroy mission and killed the wrong Croc, its ridiculous. But at the end of the day its the persons complete decision to do this sort of thing and in that case it is their responsibility. REST IN PEACE.
 
R.I.P to her cuz all she wanted was to take a picture with the tiger, i also feel bad for the tiger becuz its a wild animal, trained or not, its a tiger. Why the fuck did they kill it, there are not many of them on this earth as it is, how can u blame a wild animal for doing what wild animals do.
 
Rukas said:
Is it the choice of any animal to be trained? Cat? Dog? Should we not be photographed with them or have them in our home? Enough said.

yes, you can.
you can also take a swim in a shark tank but dont be surprised when you get torn up.
 
The girl, most likely would have been scared or at least nervous to take the picture. Personally I wouldn't have gotten that close to the tiger like that, but I can understand why she felt comfortable enough to do so. But if you run with the devil, then expect to get burnt.

Rukas, you say the tiger was trained, well, try telling that to the girls family! The tiger killed, not because it was badly trained, or becasue she owed the tiger a drug debt. But becasue the tiger was just following its instincts and at that point the tiger snapped. You can take take the tiger out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the tiger.. What exactly was the tiger put down for? For following its instincts? or for following its instincts and not behaving like its owners want it to?

Sounds like the Iraqi war.
Bush:"Let us take over and occupy your country and we'll stop killing you"
trainer to the tiger:"Do as your told and stop following your instincsts or we will kill you"

If the girl hadn't have died and was just injured, then I bet everybody would be sympathising with the tiger (media) and saying that it was scared and got frigtened. But becasue the girl died sadly, now people are just looking for a scape goat. And the tiger unfortunately is the easy target.
#And to make the comparison between the tiger and a human killing, is unbelieavable (sp?)
 
Rukas said:
Is it the choice of any animal to be trained? Cat? Dog? Should we not be photographed with them or have them in our home? Enough said.

Very weak argument. U gone kill ur cat if it turned around n scratched u? I think not.

Ppl's pets randomly attack all tha time. I've had my cat scratch me for no reason before. Yeah, we can take pics wit em. N if they attack, u can't blame em when u forced em into trainin.


U kno wat? I'm a train u to walk around a cage n take pics wit me n stuff. N if u ever turn around to punch me in tha face, I'm a kill u.

Skillz
 
Rukas said:
Keep laughing. The animal WASNT wild. The animal was TRAINED. Its not like she went to Africa stood next to a tiger and got eaten. That would be stupid. But she didnt do that, she went to a national park who's business it is to have people pose next to their animals. This is what they are TRAINED to do. The tiger WAS NOT wild.

Worst analogy EVER. The animal was trained. That was its purpose, she did what she was SUPPOSED to do and what she probably PAID to do.

No, its NOT. Its a TRAINED animal. Dogs can be viscious and deadly too, should people not take photos with them?
]

Those arguments are simply wrong, Ruk. Tigers are something wholly different than a dog or cat. Dogs and cats have been domesticated for millennia. Tigers haven't (and rightfully so). Something like a "trained tiger" doesn't really exist. Sure, a guy with "talent" can teach them to jump through burning hoops and all that, but is that tiger really trained and domesticated in the way a dog or cat is? Even dogs and cats resort to primary instincts once in a while and try to attack a human being when they feel threatened, annoyed, hurt, you name it. Now we have a tiger which is 500 pounds and has nails like daggers. What the fuck do you think we can expect? Just because it's supposed to be a "trained tiger" it will do whatever the fuck it's handler tells it to do? No, inside it is still the lethal predator it has always been.

Don't be stupid. Tigers and other big felines will always be wild animals, not lapdogs.

Oh, and tigers don't exist in Africa...
 
I say if ANYONE should be blamed it should be the park and the tigers trainers. If the Tiger should be killed, so should the trainers. Also the park should closed until it is safer. But it is definately NOT the girls fault and NOT the tigers fault!
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.