I think Parvati deserved it the most (even though I would have liked to see Russell win
) ... Sandra didn't really have any strategy, she was never a real target, she never made any big moves, nor did she win a challenge. Her whole game was based on the "I want to take out Russell" motive, which she didn't even complete. Parvati made big moves, won challenges, and struggled to outlast since she was generally a target, just like Russell.
They only failed cause their 'social game' lacked, which is bullshit to an extent, cause it seems like the jury only base their votes on who they like better. GTFO, this isn't high school. If anything the jury looked like whiny bitches. JT sealed his own faith, if anything he should have given Russell his vote for fooling him the way he did. What about those that were taken out by Parvati when she gave away not only 1, but 2 immunity idols to save her villains, and the hero took the fall for it. Same as Russell giving his one idol to Parvati to save her. None of these big moves were taken into account, and it's much more than anything a hero did. Fuck it, out of the heroes, only James did the most by being a strong competitor while having an injured leg.
They said the game is 1/3 luck, 1/3 strategy, 1/3 social ... All I saw from the jury were whiny heroes (especially Rupert talking about good, even though he was quick to align himself with Russell when he made a final 3 deal) who made the decision solely based on social... except for Coach, who seemed to understand what the game is about, and that being a strong competitor is important.