so they founded the little girls remains...who can you really blame?

i would get a knife, take tha mu fucker out back, then i would stick my knife threw his neck and there no bullshit trial just dump tha body. saves everybody a little time.
 
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
Well that ain't the brightest move, I'll make 10G before you lol

Anyways, so I don't get chastisted again.....

I feel what you're saying Aristotle & totally agree that there isn't enough focus put on rehabilitation but now that this has happened, you can only expect quasi-emotional reactions.

I also made note of how you referred to Communism like it was a bad thing .....*cough*typical Yank*cough*... & contradicted yourself by saying that your laws are pretty rational & yet you are going to have that many on Death Row by 2013 - don't sound too rational or pratical to me.

Anyways, viva Fidel!

Hasta La Victoria Siempre!!
How did i contradict myself by saying that laws are rational enough not to go killing people left and right, the number of people on death row is not because of how many people are commiting such crimes, rather than the number of people actually being executed, which is very very little per year. Communism sounds nice but there is no ,i hate using this word after idiot bush so uses it now, freedom. Laughing at the typical Yank comment also, even in America yanks are commonly thought of as white, so sorry for you. Im sure we can go on about a vote of the people and a dictator and so on but i got my point across with the original topic.
 
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
1. Like it or not, while people don't enjoy being oppressed, there is an inherent difference between being oppressed by your own, & being oppressed by a foreigner. The latter has almost always been the preferred choice. At the time of the revolution, Cuba was America's playground where their rich could satisfy all their vices. The country & it's people were being raped in exchange for Batista getting a fat wallet full of dollars. When Che & the brothers Castro (Raul & Fidel) overthrew the government the future was bright. I mean, Fidel's main objective was to liberate the country & seize power - Communist intentions were not prevalent. In fact, Fidel was never a Communsit, it was Che who converted him & their army. Anyways, for this reason I still admire Fidel's actions then, afterwards his methods became a lot worse & less justifiable & when Che - a true man of the people (even those who were not his own) - died there was but a Communist government without it's talisman. I do think though that, had it not been for American intervention, Fidel would not have seen the need for such an iron rule.

Castro achieved an admirable feat in making his country truly indpenedent but at what cost to the population at large? For over 40 years Cuba has suffered poverty and misery all the hands of his regime. As often happens, the great leader in war didn't turn out to be the peacetime magnet everyone had hoped for.

CalcuoCuchicheo said:
Cuba has, arguably, the best medical system in the world. Along with Britain, it is one of the only countries that employs a 'completely free' medical service & is, in fact, less expensive to the people than the British equivalent. This, to me, shows that some ideals of Communism have been kept in place & used for their original intention.

You make a valid point however in comparison to western standards how "good" is Cuba's medical system? They are perhaps one of the poorest countries in the world (except for Castro himself of course who is a millionaire many times over) and can barely afford to sustain their people in sanitary housing nevermind quality healthcare.
 
Emma said:
Nah cos then they're living off the tax payers money. They don't deserve to breath usefull oxygen :thumb:

If thats what it takes to make people suffer then I don't mind paying tax. Death is the easy way out.
 
nail_polish said:
i think its society because of laws that let fuckers like him who are known to be a threat to society go free and do same stuff again..

story.couey1.ap.jpg


why cant our society stop being so morally soft and just kill these fuckers...its not like one less life in this world will make a difference especially when they are threat to us..why is this society so kind to criminals giving them second chances...i just dont get it :rolleyes:


rip little Marie :(

index_05.gif




ya seriously. I totally agree. I dont think ppl like this deserve 2nd chances. They always say: x-cons deserve a 2nd chance cause they paid a debt to society...thats bullshit. Some crimes should get the death penalty right away. None of that bullshit lethal injection bullshit. Bullet to the head and peace out. NO 2ND CHANCES.


dag!





PEACE
 
why cant our society stop being so morally soft and just kill these fuckers...its not like one less life in this world will make a difference especially when they are threat to us..

If someone is a threat we lock them in prison so he/she is no longer a threat. Why not kill someone? Cause who are u to judge if someone has the right to live or die. That simple. Cause sometimes our judges condamn innocent people. If we keep them alive we have a chance to somehow correct those wrong decisions. That's why it's better not to kill someone, esp because it's cheaper then the death sentence (check that other thread in WoW) ......
 
The.Menace said:
If someone is a threat we lock them in prison so he/she is no longer a threat. Why not kill someone? Cause who are u to judge if someone has the right to live or die.

I am the father/mother of the child that died. That's my right. That's what makes me the person to judge the killer. You've taken the life of a completely innocent person, and now we're going to take the life of someone who is not innocent at all. I believe the death penalty should used as long as there is enough evidence to prove guilt.

Life for life? Makes sense to me.

That's why it's better not to kill someone, esp because it's cheaper then the death sentence (check that other thread in WoW) ......

The death sentence would be less expensive if the government made it less expensive. They dont have to be all fancy and everything. Just kill 'em off the easy and cheap way. Don't make it such a drama.
 
H.E. Pennypacker said:
I am the father/mother of the child that died. That's my right. That's what makes me the person to judge the killer. You've taken the life of a completely innocent person, and now we're going to take the life of someone who is not innocent at all. I believe the death penalty should used as long as there is enough evidence to prove guilt.

Life for life? Makes sense to me.



The death sentence would be less expensive if the government made it less expensive. They dont have to be all fancy and everything. Just kill 'em off the easy and cheap way. Don't make it such a drama.


Wouldn't you rather have the murderer suffer? I know I would. I'd want them to remain in solitude till the day they die... wishing they were dead.
 
I am the father/mother of the child that died. That's my right.
Why is that your right? Why? Eye for an eye in what you seem to believe in was develloped 3000 years ago. Not even in the bible (new testament) it's used no more....so not even the bibel (unless you only believe in the old testament) it would justify your actions. So what gives you the right? THIS is only your point of view, NOTHING more then your point of view....and who tells us that this is the right point of view? Noone can say that except God, we all human, we can't say this is the right point of view....

See things from an other side. There are states were u get killed for using drugs. So from that point of view, maybe 50% of the member here would deserve to die. In Sudan women get killed if they have sex before marriage, at least if they are pregnant afterwards. For that point of view, maybe 80% of the femals on this board deserve to die.....
So - who are you to judge. I say lock him down for life, period. Noone gets something out of death....there is just the risk that we kill someone that might be innocent.

That's what makes me the person to judge the killer. You've taken the life of a completely innocent person, and now we're going to take the life of someone who is not innocent at all. I believe the death penalty should used as long as there is enough evidence to prove guilt.

What is enough evidence? How many blacks got killed and were proven to be innocent now that we have DNA analyses? How could you define enough prove?
 
xxsaraxx said:
If thats what it takes to make people suffer then I don't mind paying tax. Death is the easy way out.
That's true, as long as they're locked up in a room by themselves with no one else that would make me happy :thumb:
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.