Why is it that Christianity and Islam seem to be breeding the most extremists? I haven't seen a Hindu or Jew extremist. Or Buddhist one either.
never seen an atheist extremist

Why is it that Christianity and Islam seem to be breeding the most extremists? I haven't seen a Hindu or Jew extremist. Or Buddhist one either.

never seen an atheist extremist![]()
It just means you reject the existence of God or any other gods, doesn't it? There are no is 'atheistic' belief system. Most of the 'atheism' talk is because of what the Bible and Qur'an say about 'unbelievers' and the only reason the word 'atheist' exists is because the word 'theist' exists. Or is that not what you meant?

^ Well, most atheists would tell you that it's so unlikely that God exists that it makes it almost a fact, not a belief. Also, since there are no real, scientific premises of God's existence it's obvious that:
1. (Atheist version) God doesn't exist
2. (Agnostic version) it's impossible to tell whether God exists or not.
I like the second version and personally find it to be the "best" (as it's not biased) stance.
To me it also seems like atheists are like agnostics that were pissed off with theists and picked the other extreme.
EDIT: I also found this very interesting:
Agnostic theism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, generally you're right. It's pretty much the rejection of a higher-power and the idea of an afterlife. That being said, wouldn't that be a belief though? For example, no one can really prove there is no afterlife, just as a devout Christian can prove there is one. Wouldn't that be a leap of faith in itself? A certain belief that cannot be proven? (Not choosing sides here, I'm just playing around with discussion). Ideologies are a set of beliefs, wouldn't that be one of them? There is also such a thing as positive and negative Atheism...
I'm not saying you guys are wrong, but I like humoring ideas![]()
Atheism isn't an ideology.
What I don't understand is why are we giving them so many extra rights that non-immigrants don't have. For example, why do they get extra holidays? Do I get extra holidays? No. Then they should either take the paycut for these days they aren't working or work the extra hours to get them off.
And people piss me of when they use their religious holidays as excuses. I work in Collections for a bank and some guy told me he couldn't pay because that specific day was a holiday. When I replied that he could have paid any other day before his due date, he told me I didn't respect his holiday. I felt like telling him off.
Ps that goes for all non-Christian religion followers who get our Christian holidays + their holidays. I swear, I'm going to sign up at a mosque or something and get these extra days off too. Or invent my own religion with plenty of holidays. If we give them all they want, then I want all they want too.
Atheism may not be an ideology but there is a common set of beliefs (a belief not being faith-related, but simply a conviction and confidence in an assertion about the world) associated with atheism. That set might consist of rejecting religion, believing in evolution, etc.
Those beliefs do then influence the way people behave. One example off the top of my head is that an atheist probably would not vote for a person running for office if the person believed in Creationism.
The more interesting question that arises from Chronic's statement is why he feels the need to explicitly say it's not an ideology.

Atheists want to believe that they've chosen their path for themselves, that they are independent and rational, and not "sheep".
There is a superiority complex that comes with it that I don't expect Chronic or most atheists to admit.
In other words, you have a belief.
" I thought he was being sarcastic and was using the same rhetoric I've seen a lot of religious people use "Hitler was an atheist" (although I don't think he actually was?) etc. and this prompted me to point out the flaw in his (and every other person who I have seen making that claim) logic. But now I remember Euphanasia not being religious and re-reading his post he wasn't being sarcastic.What I don't understand is why are we giving them so many extra rights that non-immigrants don't have.
As far as I'm concerned the power and influence of religions should be minimized in Europe. And no, I'm not an atheist.
Also, Islam is the one making the most harm at the moment, not Christianity.
That tendency described there is obvious and kind of worries me but not really that much yet. I hope that in a civilized place it's harder to be brainwashed so maybe it's a good way of civilizing Islam.

What I don't understand is why are we giving them so many extra rights that non-immigrants don't have. For example, why do they get extra holidays? Do I get extra holidays? No. Then they should either take the paycut for these days they aren't working or work the extra hours to get them off.
