Rizzle said:"Changes Changes Changes Changes!!!" is not in the released version of the song, only the original. if you do have the original you must care for his music. that's a bad poll you made there, friend.
Rizzle said:"Changes Changes Changes Changes!!!" is not in the released version of the song, only the original. if you do have the original you must care for his music. that's a bad poll you made there, friend.
i guess we are more alike than we both realize ;x© said:i was gonna make that point lol
i didn't say it was a bad thread, i said it was a bad poll. either way, i was joking. but let's be serious for a second here. how do you expect to have a nice discussion about how good tupac was? first and foremost, the question in itself is moronic, reason being that there is no unit of measurement for the quality of an artist's music. either you like him, or you don't. there are several factors involved in how much various artists appeal to various listeners. the options in your poll remind me of polls from humor websites. when the only options are "yes", "no" or "undecided", you can get good poll results, but you can't have a poll on how good tupac is without including hundreds of options, in which case people wouldn't bother to scroll through them all. the poll in itself is stupid. then on to the discussion side of things. how can you have a nice discussion about how good tupac is? i tell you i think he's good, you tell me you don't think he's too good. i can try and persuade you into thinking what i think, and the other way around, but we both know neither of us will change our opinions. it is a matter of taste. and having everybody state how much they like tupac is not a discussion. discussions are two-way. besides, threads like these have been done a million times before.Tonio1986 said:No it isnt a bad thread. it depends on you. We can have a nice discussion, though there are always some dumb members.
Rizzle said:i guess we are more alike than we both realize ;x
i didn't say it was a bad thread, i said it was a bad poll. either way, i was joking. but let's be serious for a second here. how do you expect to have a nice discussion about how good tupac was? first and foremost, the question in itself is moronic, reason being that there is no unit of measurement for the quality of an artist's music. either you like him, or you don't. there are several factors involved in how much various artists appeal to various listeners. the options in your poll remind me of polls from humor websites. when the only options are "yes", "no" or "undecided", you can get good poll results, but you can't have a poll on how good tupac is without including hundreds of options, in which case people wouldn't bother to scroll through them all. the poll in itself is stupid. then on to the discussion side of things. how can you have a nice discussion about how good tupac is? i tell you i think he's good, you tell me you don't think he's too good. i can try and persuade you into thinking what i think, and the other way around, but we both know neither of us will change our opinions. it is a matter of taste. and having everybody state how much they like tupac is not a discussion. discussions are two-way. besides, threads like these have been done a million times before.
now how's that for a dumb member. (note: do realize that i ended that last sentence with a period and not a question mark on purpose. you are not supposed to answer.)
Rizzle said:i guess we are more alike than we both realize ;x
i didn't say it was a bad thread, i said it was a bad poll. either way, i was joking. but let's be serious for a second here. how do you expect to have a nice discussion about how good tupac was? first and foremost, the question in itself is moronic, reason being that there is no unit of measurement for the quality of an artist's music. either you like him, or you don't. there are several factors involved in how much various artists appeal to various listeners. the options in your poll remind me of polls from humor websites. when the only options are "yes", "no" or "undecided", you can get good poll results, but you can't have a poll on how good tupac is without including hundreds of options, in which case people wouldn't bother to scroll through them all. the poll in itself is stupid. then on to the discussion side of things. how can you have a nice discussion about how good tupac is? i tell you i think he's good, you tell me you don't think he's too good. i can try and persuade you into thinking what i think, and the other way around, but we both know neither of us will change our opinions. it is a matter of taste. and having everybody state how much they like tupac is not a discussion. discussions are two-way. besides, threads like these have been done a million times before.
now how's that for a dumb member. (note: do realize that i ended that last sentence with a period and not a question mark on purpose. you are not supposed to answer.)
Think_ThuGLiFE said:Just close this dumb thread with this smart statement... the 2pac disscussion on how much ppl like him or how good is stupid. Just go into the hit em up web site and read about him to see how "good" he was in certain aspects.
my list says hes the g.o.a.t. and #1 on ma list 2
Tonio1986 said:But you moron have voted in this poll, lol, also you made a statement, so wtf are you talkin about?