I'm not sure if I understand the argument that they were scattered. So were the animals. And I disagree with the last part of your post. That we were animals with "probaby not a great deal of intelligent thought". I'm not talking about neanderthals. They can be considered a different species. I'm talking about the first generation of homo sapien sapien, or if you think symbolically you understand what I mean. Individuals with the same/very very similar physiology. I'm not saying that because we ate it then, we should eat it now. I'm saying that no human should ever have to wake up at a given point in time on a daily basis and do a job. We're supposed to wake up by ourselves when the sun comes up. But due to the many hundreds of millions of little routines and rules and etiquettes we humans have developed over millenias, the consequence is that you have a totally irrational thought that is unnatural for your species - that you shouldn't take in a particular kind of nutrition. A tiger will not think about the pain you go through when it chews you up, so why should you consider the pain it goes through when you shoot it and kill it? And I'm not saying I would gladly kill all animals, this last paragraph doesn't necessarily even reflect what I personally think. What I think is irrelevant, I'm trying to pain you an abstract picture of a thought concept that I want you to entertain for a while for your own sake.
Lol. Nice burn. I respectfully disagree, however. As for the point you present, don't you see how it is biased? A lot of people that turned into vegetarians were happier after they did. Okay. If I study to become a lawyer I will probably be very happy when I'm done, but that's not a solid reason for me to actually start law school, unless it's what I actually want. So if I want something and get it, I'm happy too. It's sort of pointless to mention that all meat eaters that stopped eating meat feel happier, because I'm sure all vegetarians that thought "FUCK this" are now happier because they eat meat again.
You misunderstand. I am saying that every study has the potential to be either spot on or complete bullshit, but studies are very biased. Let's say I want to find out whether there's a connection between nicotine and cancer, and I find that nicotine does in fact not cause cancer. That doesn't mean I can assume that smoking doesn't. Studies are normally very specific, and offer a very limited part of the full picture. So like I said, I don't use studies as arguments because if you go back a few decades there were studies that showed that smoking was healthy. A study is nothing more than the opinion of a person or a group of people, based on a very limited sample experiment which may or may not have been executed properly.
I said it because you said that you think the meat industry is just out to make money, and doesn't care about people's health. When you said that, you sorta implied that this was true for the meat industry, but not for the vegetable industry. So I sort of ridiculed your statement by presenting an extreme opposite. I did so in the form of a question: How is the vegetable industry any different to the meat industry if you look away from the fact that the products they sell are physically different? And the answer, I will give for you: They are not. You posted your opinion, and I am telling you why I disagree. And you can argue all you want but everyone knows I'm right. The vegetable industry isn't hippieland where everyone loves everyone. It's farms and factories and transportation and sale and recoup and everything else that the meat industry is. I don't understand why you even said that you think the meat industry is out for money, that's like saying "I think the sky is blue". Oh shit, REALLY? And when you make a post with several arguments for why eating meat is bad, and then throw in things like "I believe the meat industry is out for money", some stupid moron could read it and think "HEY THAT MAEKZ SENS!", because the whole post is against meat-eaters so anyone that agrees with a couple of your points will agree with your whole post. I felt it was my duty to shed light on this fact for the not-so-bright.
No, but you can buy organic meat. Or simply not give a fuck, because I bet you drink a coke from time to time. Some alcohol. I bet once in a while you treat yourself to a Snicker bar. What do you know about E202? What happens when that molecule enters your bloodstream and is picked up by a cell in your brain? You have no idea, yet you do all those things. But you decided that the one unnatural thing they put in meat is a good enough reason to never eat it. It seems hypocritical to me. Then I would respect you a lot more if you just said that it's simply a personal choice because you feel happier with it. That's an honest opinion. You get personal in your response to me and call me shit like "someone as yourself", so I obviously struck a nerve. I wasn't bein offensive so I have no clue where this is coming from. I do know that I got you mad by disagreeing with you.
I have a history of social phobias, and I'm known for being an exceptionally nice and outgoing person. I generally hit my brother's shoulder when he smacks flies because he smacks them for just being there. Some people kill wasps or bees because they don't wanna get stung, not realizing that the wasp will only sting them if they try to kill it. I let wasps land on my shoulder and when they realize I'm nothing interesting they leave me a lone. I let a spider live in the corner of my room for 2 months before my mother vacuumed it. I'm on suicide watch for a friend constantly on my own initiative (because he's unstable and I'm not sure what he'll do). I am in fact the opposite of all those things you mentioned, but I love the fact that you think you know me simply because I disagree with you. I also love the fact that you get personal, and that instead of logically explaining your points of view, you just give me shit for not blindly accepting anything you say. I raised some very good counter-points and I expected a more mature response, because for the life of me I can't understand why people turn into vegetarians. But I want to, because I like to understand things, so I ask critical questions and put everything on the edge as if I was min-maxing, to sort of understand the outer boundaries of your moral opinion on this matter. So I can understand why you feel like you do. So yeah, you're pretty much as wrong as anyone every could have been with all your assumptions of me.