i spoke to my friends mother in singapore today, she is one of the most respected linguisist's in the world (She is an Associate Professor in the Department of English Language & Literature, NUS, and the Deputy Director at the International Relations Office, NUS. She serves on several editorial boards, including The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics; Current Issues in Language Planning; Language Policy (Book Series); Language and Education; The International Journal of Multilingualism; Mulitilingualism and Linguistic Diversity; World Englishes, The Journal of Asian Englishes, and Asian Englishes Today (Book Series). She is also a Board Member of Times Media (Academic Publishing), and chairs the Language and Linguistics Cluster Committee and Series Ideas.)
When i told her about this discussion she said that evoloution of language is only evoloution when EVERYONE agrees upon the language change. Words like aks isn't accepted english and never will be simply because the people that use it generally don't have a college degree or have grown up in areas where the majority of the population is uneducated.
When i told her about this discussion she said that evoloution of language is only evoloution when EVERYONE agrees upon the language change. Words like aks isn't accepted english and never will be simply because the people that use it generally don't have a college degree or have grown up in areas where the majority of the population is uneducated.
Perhaps because saying "aks" for "ask" simply makes no sense at all?
