ATI_RAGE_ said:
Ahhh very good you have named a name.
If the government did it why shoot down their own plane? Perhaps only taking 1 trade center building would be good enough. They took two. Then the Pentagon.
Why did they stop there? Instead they abort their own plan and shoot down their own men?
What if the American people would have reacted the same way as the USS Cole? The American people would have said " Lob a few missles" then what do they do?
you have to undestans that they needed an attack so bad that no matter what they wanted to implement would be accepted by the american people out of fear of another attack
they shove there threats down the throats of americans everyday
support this or we will be attack, accept the patriot act or else more attacks will happen, if we dont invade iraq we will be attacked again ect ect ect
and with 911 so fresh in the minds of americans they are scared into accepting these things
if only 1 wtc building was brought down do you think we would be in iraq today
probably not
the palne shot imo was not an aborted plan, it was the plan
that showed to the people of america that the passengers on that flight where patriotic
there isnt as much evidence surrounding that flight to fully answer your question
the USS cole was not a large enough attack to gain support for the kind of plans in work today
imo it was simply a seed planted in the minds of americans that binladen was an evil terrrorist that wanted to hurt americans
this way the next time binladens name is mentioned they associate that name with terrorism ect ect