You're not looking at the other side of the equation. The problem with increasing the minimum wage is that it discriminates against low-skilled laborers and minorities. A high minimum wage is more attractive to skilled laborers and the skilled laborers have an advantage over low-skilled labors. If, for example, the minimum wage in my state was $10 an hour, it would provide incentive for those with high school diplomas, or even 2 year degrees, to apply for the job. What happens to the significant number of youth in the 15-18 age range without high school diplomas if the minimum wage is $10? They have a harder time finding a job. That is the problem with artificial increases in minimum wages. Another problem with artificial increases in wages is productivity. If you as a worker produce $5 worth of goods in an hour, why should you be paid $8 an hour?
There have been decades of studies done showing that minimum wage laws actually decrease employment. The OECD concurs with that as well.
Now, I'm curious to see what you're basing your argument off of. If you have data or published articles saying that the low minimum wage in the US is increasing poverty levels, I'd be happy to read them.
Also, I'm curious what AmerikazMost thinks of this matter as his knowledge of economics is far better from mine.
I wanted to reply to this but I think this discussion really goes way beyond the boundaries of internet contact and can only be properly resolved through direct communication, hehe.
Just a small few things:
15-18 yr olds applying for a job aren't the usual standard to measure poverty. These are usually school going people going for a job on the side, not people that really have to feed mouths (lack of "beer money" is not poverty. Lack of "food money" quite clearly is.)
If you're 15-18 without any diploma's and no experience, you're going to have a hard time finding a job regardless of the economic circumstances.
On the difference between "skilled" and "unskilled" labour: You'll always need unskilled labour. So increasing minimum wage for these people that, brutally put, can't do any better (but they do have families to look after), only helps them.
On the "attractiveness" of a job based on salary: I think you're overestimating the effects. If minimum wage goes up, some jobs may become interesting for "skilled" labourers where previously they were not. But there are many factors working in their disadvantage (a student thats more intelligent than Mr. B may do just as well but since Mr. B has a family to feed he WILL be the more loyal and better worker than the student who's working to finance a beer tab).
Also, you may overestimate the eagerness of skilled labour picking up unskilled jobs purely for the money. These people and their employers will quickly realize the workers are going to move on sooner or later. And the type of jobs we're talking about here don't really rely on pure intelligence and skill to be able to function.
I immediately admit, though, that my knowledge of economics is rudimentary at best. I'm also interested in what Amerikazmost may have to add to this, since he seems knowledgeable on this subject. I do think the effects of it all will straighten out over a few years and that an increase in minor wage helps against poverty.