Hooray! Still don't know what the fuck it does, but there's been so much butt-hurt over it over the past several years so, hooray!
With 4G, did we ever hit "true" 4G speeds?
Best Buy now has the TLC 65" R615 for $499. What a steal.
Theoretical max speeds are not reachable under typical deployments. To achieve those you'd need a sole device connected to a single tower next to it, and with 100% prioritized network traffic. They only do that for the tests before they launch a given tower.
LTE-Advanced, which is the modern standard for 4G has a theoretical speed of up to 1Gb/s and typically reaches 200-220Mb/s in large cities (some carriers realistically reach ~500Mb/s), which I think is way, way more than enough for a smartphone. Even at 200Mb/s, you're burning through 1GB of data in ~35 seconds, or about one run of Speedtest.
As a matter of fact, I purposefully cap my DL speeds at 5Mb/s so I don't run out of my 5GB of monthly data by things like Youtube deciding I'm good to stream at 4K when on the move. I honestly can't tell a difference 99% of the time as most websites or messengers typically won't send data faster than that.
That's probably the best deal on any TV ever. Whoever buys this is sure to be very impressed with what they get for that price, to say the least.
Samsung's QLED looks like a halfway point between LCD and OLED but the pricing is still closer to an OLED, from my research. TCL makes QLED too now, I think?
Also, when comparing OLED to LCD/LED, is LED or LCD the correct term to use? I know they count as both but using them interchangeably feels weird.
Either Google has gone sane and realized its Pixels are overpriced, as are most phones, or the Pixels are not selling well.
The 3a is $280 and the 3a XL is $360. I don't think you'd find an S9 or Note 9 for anything under $500. To find Google's budget phone from last generation at this price is weird.
3a is still £399 here which sucks
Seems a bit sensationalized?