you failed
maybe if you took longer than 5 seconds you would of stopped yourself from creating a terrible thread
maybe if you took longer than 5 seconds you would of stopped yourself from creating a terrible thread
while your thread just keeps gettin better
Why do you do this?It's "would have".
"would of" makes no grammatical sense.
You failed.
It's "would have".
"would of" makes no grammatical sense.
You failed.
Why do you do this?
yeah man. Resorting to spelling and grammar on the nets usually means you failed. But you're planting that seed so everyone gets angry and retorts so that you can laugh at them for responding in the first place because you want them to do that so you can feel powerful, or something.
for goodness sake, im sick of this.
for goodness sake, im sick of this.
casey made a thread about children's movies. edouble made a comment about movies in general (it seems). casey's point is what children are exposed to. its light-hearted humour. if no-one responds, no-one responds to the thread. to say he failed is a bit drastic, because he didnt try to achieve anything. he just posted something in a forum.
it seems like people only want good threads and are cynics about anything other than that. we all know that there are a lack of good threads. that means there will be very little activity on the board. a thread is a thread, let it be...
edit: to say casey does that to feel powerful, also works the other way. when people criticise others about the thread they just created - as if they are an authoritarian figure who has to be pleased and makes the judgement of what is acceptable.
I personally like using, U MAD BRO?! to get under peoples skin. Its satisfactory.
wait i got somethin to saySandeep14 said:for goodness sake, im sick of this.
casey made a thread about children's movies. edouble made a comment about movies in general (it seems). casey's point is what children are exposed to. its light-hearted humour. if no-one responds, no-one responds to the thread. to say he failed is a bit drastic, because he didnt try to achieve anything. he just posted something in a forum.
it seems like people only want good threads and are cynics about anything other than that. we all know that there are a lack of good threads. that means there will be very little activity on the board. a thread is a thread, let it be...
edit: to say casey does that to feel powerful, also works the other way. when people criticise others about the thread they just created - as if they are an authoritarian figure who has to be pleased and makes the judgement of what is acceptable.