Why Microsoft, oh why the Metro UI on a desktop OS? No minimize option, no shutting down programs easily. Why?
I know this isn't exactly news but now I have it running on a virtual machine at home for quite some time and I really tried hard to make myself like this but it sucks so much that I just can't. I absolutely hate it, even more than I did when I first launched it.
And this comes from a person who loves Windows 7. Metro UI goes in an absolutely terrible direction of making Windows an unproductive tool that's hard to use for people who do more than using one small silly program at a time. Theoretically you CAN use the casual Win7-style UI but now they made it look shittier(http://blog.gsmarena.com/microsoft-alters-windows-8-desktop-look-to-match-metro-ui/) and you don't have a start menu so you're forced to use Metro UI anyway.
I can't picture serious people and businesses using this. Microsoft clearly focused on retards and tablet users.
It's really sad because the system itself had huge potential - if the UI was designed properly it would be technically better than anything else. It boots faster, keeps bloatware to minimum and uses the least resources of all fully functional desktop OSes - despite running 2 UIs at a time. If they could only tweak the looks instead of introducing that crappy new UI.
What were they thinking, I mean - where did they research come from - perhaps Apple or some Linux guys sabotaged it. I don't know a single person who likes that UI. And most people REALLY don't like it big time. I even saw Microsoft fanboys complain.
If they really head in that direction I think Windows 7 might be my last Microsoft OS, and I bet it would be true for so many other people too. Metro UI probably makes Apple happy.
I know this isn't exactly news but now I have it running on a virtual machine at home for quite some time and I really tried hard to make myself like this but it sucks so much that I just can't. I absolutely hate it, even more than I did when I first launched it.
And this comes from a person who loves Windows 7. Metro UI goes in an absolutely terrible direction of making Windows an unproductive tool that's hard to use for people who do more than using one small silly program at a time. Theoretically you CAN use the casual Win7-style UI but now they made it look shittier(http://blog.gsmarena.com/microsoft-alters-windows-8-desktop-look-to-match-metro-ui/) and you don't have a start menu so you're forced to use Metro UI anyway.
I can't picture serious people and businesses using this. Microsoft clearly focused on retards and tablet users.
It's really sad because the system itself had huge potential - if the UI was designed properly it would be technically better than anything else. It boots faster, keeps bloatware to minimum and uses the least resources of all fully functional desktop OSes - despite running 2 UIs at a time. If they could only tweak the looks instead of introducing that crappy new UI.
What were they thinking, I mean - where did they research come from - perhaps Apple or some Linux guys sabotaged it. I don't know a single person who likes that UI. And most people REALLY don't like it big time. I even saw Microsoft fanboys complain.
If they really head in that direction I think Windows 7 might be my last Microsoft OS, and I bet it would be true for so many other people too. Metro UI probably makes Apple happy.