Technology The new Opera browser

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#1

Pittsey

Knock, Knock...
Staff member
#2
I don't think I want to leave Chrome.

I used Opera a few years back. When the choice was that, or a Nokia Browser. But Chrome ticks all my boxes. Including syncing across all my devices.
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#3
Opera offers syncing too, and I guess the mobile Opera is better than mobile Chrome (at least on phones).

Now the desktop Opera is basically like Chromium - it even runs Chrome's extensions. Just the UI layer is Opera's, and I think it's better than Google's.

The bad side so far is, that most Opera's features are yet to be implemented. They took Chromium, optimized it and added basic UI removed of most Opera's features that they're yet to add.

I use Opera and Chrome, Opera was slower but I thought it's features and UI were much better. I hope a few revisions from now it's going to be the best of both worlds.
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#5
I have it for a few days already and I really like it. Enough to make it my main browser, despite the fact that key features are yet to come.. including bookmarks, lol! There's speed dial to make up for it, and "Stash", which basically holds chosen open sites to prevent too many open tabs.

It's really fast though. It's basically like Chrome stripped of everything except of the engine and replaced with lightweight UI written in native code. On my laptop it works even faster than Chrome, and launches instantly, which made me stick with it.
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#8
Yeah, it's really hilarious to me, because on the Opera developer blog there's a huge discussion - they said that they wanted to make the new browser very simple and since most people don't use bookmarks they wanted to leave it as an extension oO There was a huge outrage, and looks like they'll be adding them in an update soon.

And it made me wonder why they're releasing a stable release without bookmarks, considering there are some more advanced features implemented.
 

Preach

Well-Known Member
#10
I remember the old Opera being really bloated. Did they start over again because of that, or will they be trying to stay a "clean" browser?
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#11
I remember the old Opera being really bloated. Did they start over again because of that, or will they be trying to stay a "clean" browser?
Yeah it was bloated and had a slower rendering engine. They made a new browser because they changed the engine and everything old was incompatible with it, so they thought that it's so awesome and fast when it's clean that they're going to keep it that way. They pay a lot of attention in writing everything anew with clean, native code so everything they add doesn't slow it down.

The new Opera is super clean and they're willing to stay that way, just introducing some basic Opera signature features (but no bloat like torrent clients, RSS readers, built in email clients etc.). Also, the rendering engine is tweaked Chromium, so at this stage it resembles Chrome with more intuitive UI.
That said I still miss some behaviors of old Opera that imho worked better than in Chrome. The download manager was much better, keyboard shortcuts and mouse gestures were cool etc. So far they only brought back mouse gestures, but the download manager looks like slightly improved Chrome download manager, which I don't like as much as it doesn't give any kind of control over downloads.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top