


If that plane hit the top of a wave while in action, wouldn't it blow up on impact?Duke said:Christ, i dunno it's name, but it was a Cold War designed Soviet aircraft. Meant to skim over the water surface at some 300/400 miles an hour, it could carry over a 1000 soldiers.
Mase said:If that plane hit the top of a wave while in action, wouldn't it blow up on impact?
Duke said:Christ, i dunno it's name, but it was a Cold War designed Soviet aircraft. Meant to skim over the water surface at some 300/400 miles an hour, it could carry over a 1000 soldiers. Only 1 built (i think), kinda flopped.
EDIT: i think i remember, wasnt it the Ekranoplan?
Ill try to google the thing to see if i can find its name
here's mine, should be easy:
![]()
your picture is a c-130, which is rescue and refuel, whereas a similar kc-135 is more combat oriented. here's my fav plane of all time. was a pleasure to see:PuffnScruff said:it's a Stuka
german ww2 plane
here is mine. very easy, i flew on one of these a couple of times when i was about 6 months old coming from turkey to the states and back again.
![]()
Dante said:your picture is a c-130, which is rescue and refuel, whereas a similar kc-135 is more combat oriented. here's my fav plane of all time. was a pleasure to see:
GhostOfRazgriz said:this one is easy, but im sure it might be a bit difficult for the people on this site considering most dont know much about planes.
![]()
notice how it does not have propellors in the rear like the early models. so there was a prototype for this prototype. this plane failed because its wing geometry rendered it unflyable without the help of a computer, which has now been developed. this plane crashed in california because of not having fly by wire and the pilot lost control. i bought pieces of this airplane. i also own pieces of the SR-71, XB-70 valkyrie honeycomb, and the X-15.