It means overnight United have gone from a debt-free clubs into one with debts of 200 million, its incredible we're practically paying so he can become owner!
Invest? He's already in heavy debt, he needs to make money not spend it.ghostfacekilla said:It might not be the end of the world, more will be clear by the end of next season.He will either strip the clubs wealth and run, or he will invest and get us back to the top.
Yes, United generates a lot of wealth. Unfortunately, Glazer will probably want most of it for himself. To make big money we need to win the Premiership and/or the Champion's League. To do that we need to invest in players and hold onto the ones we have. Glazer can't afford to give Fergie the money he needs to seriously invest in the club. Look at what we need: a new first choice keeper, preferably a new centreback, central midfielders to replace Keane and Scholes and at least one more winger so that we can rest/replace Giggs without putting Rooney or Fletch out wide. £20m won't buy us that.Manchester United is worth alot of money in the long run if we can improve and maintain good champions league finishing positions. Manchester is the Biggest supported club in world football, or do i have to say soccer now?
I know nothing about American Football, nor the Glazer takeover of Tampa Bay, but I believe the Bucs have been doing shit recently.wasnt there uproar when glazer took over Tampa bay too? I believe he has done a good job there if the media is right. The club will not be debt free anymore, but neither are madrid or many of the Italian clubs, at the end of the day they still play good football, as a fan thats all i care about.
You're definitely right about money not always being the answer, but when you're up against Chelsea you need to be able to compete for the same, big name players. People like Djemba-Djemba, Kleberson and Miller (free, but on £34,000 a week) were a major waste of money. Maybe having less to spend will make Fergie more prudent and ensure he signs players who are good enough to play for United.ghostfacekilla said:^ what you said is completely logical but not the gospel, only time will tell. as they its funny old game. Like i said we will know more by the end of next season. spending mass amounts of money isnt always the answer in football, i mean who won the champions league last year? and how much did they spend. It wouldnt be so bad if the money was spent on good players, rather than chancers. as a fan i am greatful for what fergie has done, but your gonna run out of ideas after 18 years in charge. I guess his hairdryer doesnt work as well these days.
Illuminattile said:You're definitely right about money not always being the answer, but when you're up against Chelsea you need to be able to compete for the same, big name players. People like Djemba-Djemba, Kleberson and Miller (free, but on £34,000 a week) were a major waste of money. Maybe having less to spend will make Fergie more prudent and ensure he signs players who are good enough to play for United.
surely its the yankees i hear them cry 
retro8 said:If ferg's there at the end of next season and Man U win i wonder if somebody would be daring enough to dump a whole bucket of cold gatorade on him, Since i see that in the NFL.
damn hooligansI got that figurefrom UnitedRant, but I actually misquoted them.CalcuoCuchicheo said:![]()
Is that definate?
ThUg $TyLe said:Has anyone got a spare 800 million pounds? i feel like hyjacking the bid.

anything u want in return lol?