i think what Tru was trying to say was that the Red Cross took a lot of blows during the one month war, and whether or not this particular ambulance occurance was a hoax is irrelevant to the large picture. i think he is projecting his disappointment in the Red Cross being branded as liars and scammers when obviously, they were attacked on several occasions.Morris said:I don't understand Tru's blanket denial of the site or any of the facts when a picture of the ambulance is taken by news agencies globally and reposted on that site. It's quite obvious that the ambulance wasn't blown up and that there was no fire in that ambulance, which directly contradicts eyewitness testimony.
i haven't read the article so i'm not gonna comment any further.