Prince Harry the Nazi

Amara · Jan 17, 2005

^Maybe they are like the advertisements that came to life on the Simpsons...if we just stop looking at them, they'll go away. No more attention for monarchs and they'll disappear.

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

Amara said:
^Maybe they are like the advertisements that came to life on the Simpsons...if we just stop looking at them, they'll go away. No more attention for monarchs and they'll disappear.

They'd still be recieving their 'wage' for their Royal duties such as waving and..... smoking weed.... offending people worldwide .......molesting their staff and......oh yes, having their wives assasinated

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

CalcuoCuchicheo said:
They'd still be recieving their 'wage' for their Royal duties such as waving and..... smoking weed.... offending people worldwide .......molesting their staff and......oh yes, having their wives assasinated

ex wife ;o)

But anyway..they are basically a tourist attraction..like the zoo.. you can drive down the mall and see them in their natural habitat feeding off all the tax payers (like me) in the UK..

Glockmatic · Jan 17, 2005

http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=World&cat=Royal_Family

EU thinking of banning the swastika now.

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
ex wife ;o)

But anyway..they are basically a tourist attraction..like the zoo.. you can drive down the mall and see them in their natural habitat feeding off all the tax payers (like me) in the UK..

See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.

stefanwzyga · Jan 17, 2005

CalcuoCuchicheo said:
See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.

Ye thats a good idea! spend the cash on houses for the homeless all over the uk!

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

CalcuoCuchicheo said:
See even though I mentioned earlier that the only purpose they may serve is as a tourist attraction, I think that if we got rid of them tourists would still come to Britain to see all the historical locations.
Also, as we, the public, paid for the Royal jewels and such we could claim them back and keep them as tourist attractions or better yet, sell them to some eccentric Japanese billionaire, because believe me, in this day, them jewels are worth a bomb.

The wealth could then be distributed back to the people whom the Royals have stole from for centuries.

we the public didnt pay for most of the royal jewels... for example the diamond in the crown was TAKEN when they left india ..(after raping the country of course)..

I agree though of course tourists would still come to britain if they werent there.... they are funded by us and should answer to the public more than they do.. they got their wealth and status by murder, incest and robbery..hmm sounds like a good mini series...

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

actually.. why not GIVE the star back to india and let them sell it to pay for the victims of the tsunami.. of course they would never sell it but i guess the kind hearfelt words from the queen were enough

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
we the public didnt pay for most of the royal jewels... for example the diamond in the crown was TAKEN when they left india ..(after raping the country of course)..

I agree though of course tourists would still come to britain if they werent there.... they are funded by us and should answer to the public more than they do.. they got their wealth and status by murder, incest and robbery..hmm sounds like a good mini series...

When new crowns and shit were wanted, extra taxes were imposed to fund their creation - we pay the taxes so we paid for them.

(Obviously I recognize this hasn't happened in a long time but the fact remains this shit was paid for by the public, so should belong to the public)

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

how did the public pay for a jewels that were stolen?... did they pay the gas for the getaway car?

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
how did the public pay for a jewels that were stolen?... did they pay the gas for the getaway car?

hahaha

Nah man, I think we paid for the workers who did shit like melting down gold and whatever it is they do to jewels to make them a certain shape or size.

BTW, I'm refering to olden times when there was no cars that used gas, as well as more recent times.

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

ohh.. they paid for the labour that went into the crown.. i get ya.. so the way i see it.. the value has to be divided into what the UK public paid for and what they took..then it would be fair

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
ohh.. they paid for the labour that went into the crown.. i get ya.. so the way i see it.. the value has to be divided into what the UK public paid for and what they took..then it would be fair

OK. If you're saying the jewels and shit were stolen then who ran up in India and snatched them? Not a fucking Royal that's for sure. Soldiers - ordinary men. The shit was then shipped to Britain and yada, yada, yada. Point is, from the beginning to end, the crown jewels creation were funded by the tax (to pay for soldiers, workers) and work of the British people therefore, they belong to the British people.

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

lol..i think u got it twisted...

im not saying IF they were stolen..they were stolen from the people of that country
just cos a royal didnt go and personally take them doesnt mean they had nothing to do with it..

do you think if a soldier in iraq took a gold statue from a museum.. that its gonna look right if its displayed in the whitehouse?

Britain wasnt at war with india... they took over it just like they did everything else..when they left, the monarchy took what they wanted and left the people there with jack shit..end of story

the british people didnt pay for shit.. they taxed the country to pay for what thy wanted

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
lol..i think u got it twisted...

im not saying IF they were stolen..they were stolen from the people of that country
just cos a royal didnt go and personally take them doesnt mean they had nothing to do with it..

do you think if a soldier in iraq took a gold statue from a museum.. that its gonna look right if its displayed in the whitehouse?

Britain wasnt at war with india... they took over it just like they did everything else..when they left, the monarchy took what they wanted and left the people there with jack shit..end of story

the british people didnt pay for shit.. they taxed the country to pay for what thy wanted

I know we ruled India (and BTW we took most of what we wanted from there long before we were forced to leave) but people still had to be paid to steal that shit, ship that shit and craft that shit and the British people paid for that, once again through taxes or labour (taking over a country).

And once again, a lit of the Royal jewels were made a very long time ago when Britain was without an empire and back then the taxpayer paid for the jewels.

Off subject, what does it mean when it says that I'm subscribed to this thread?

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

we're obviously talking about 2 diffrent times here...when u left india is when you took the diamond.. no one had to paid to steal it..as u ruled the country why would you?..and the british people didnt pay for it..for the last time.. half the crown wasnt even made in the UK... where were the best skilled gold smiths and diamond cutters..in London??

if your talking about medieval times..then thats different..

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
we're obviously talking about 2 diffrent times here...when u left india is when you took the diamond.. no one had to paid to steal it..as u ruled the country why would you?..and the british people didnt pay for it..for the last time.. half the crown wasnt even made in this country...

if your talking about medieval times..then thats different..

I know they don't pay the Indian people but our soldiers need to get paid for maintaining control of the country, the jewels have to be shipped to Britain and the they have to be crafted. There is much of the taxpayer's money involved in the process.

Do you know anything about what I asked at the end of my last post?

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

^im not sure.. im not subscribed to any threads...i always wonderend what that meant too

CalcuoCuchicheo · Jan 17, 2005

vg4030 said:
^im not sure.. im not subscribed to any threads...i always wonderend what that meant too

I didn't do anything different than I usually do either, so this shit's got me confused.

vg4030 · Jan 17, 2005

sorry man.. i dont have a clue..lol

Prince Harry the Nazi

New Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Little Miss Vixen

Well-Known Member

Donate