People Who Make Your Jaw Drop (not literally, but you get the point) Thread.

[masta247]

The first girl isnt all that? You gotta be kidding me. Shes got an awesome body!

Plus, the difference between the first and the second girl is not that big. So saying the first girl isnt all that and the second is the bomb doesnt make sense to me.

I see a huge difference. Maybe it's just me but those belly muscles combined with huge hips and small tits and a kind of slutty look on her face turn me off. I find the second one to be good though, I mean her body.
She's not that great looking but is sexy.

 

[Bobby Sands]

lmao Masta, you are such a critical motherfucker.

 

[keco52]

^ understatement. We all have different tastes but the pix he posted in the other thread look like ur average middle school girl to me.

 

[masta247]

^That girl in the other thread looks cute to me and if she looks like an average middle school girl I'd like to go to any school with girls like her.
Then these girls from this thread imo look like average, fit and regular gym visitors - they only have sexy bodies while the first one for some reason doesn't appeal to me and that's it.

Also, while a good body does look attractive it's a different kind of attractiveness to me. Pretty much physical only, if you know what I mean. Nothing more nothing else. I appreciate a girl that has something special about her looks more than a girl with a very fit looking body. I think the latter only matters as far as sex is concerned. That "Oh I'd like to hit that" thought and I think I grew out of that phase.
It's not what I desire, although I can appreciate it too to some extent but it's like looking in totally different categories.

I think most men describe it either objectively as "a hot chick to fuck and leave" or a "girlfriend material" type of girl. Both can be good in their own categories but are not to be confused and are appealing in totally different ways. While everyone has a different taste to me that's the difference between the second chick from this thread and the girl that I posted in the other thread.
I mean - from my experience most men with brains admire the "hot chick" type but end up being with the second type of girls.

Bobby, I'm not that critical in real life, actually I'm not very critical about other people unless I'm joking but since it's the internet and we're judging chicks "that would make my jaw drop" I need moar

 

[Flipmo]

^That girl in the other thread looks cute to me and if she looks like an average middle school girl I'd like to go to any school with girls like her.
Then these girls from this thread imo look like average, fit and regular gym visitors - they only have sexy bodies while the first one for some reason doesn't appeal to me and that's it.

Also, while a good body does look attractive it's a different kind of attractiveness to me. Pretty much physical only, if you know what I mean. Nothing more nothing else. I appreciate a girl that has something special about her looks more than a girl with a very fit looking body. I think the latter only matters as far as sex is concerned. That "Oh I'd like to hit that" thought and I think I grew out of that phase.
It's not what I desire, although I can appreciate it too to some extent but it's like looking in totally different categories.

I think most men describe it either objectively as "a hot chick to fuck and leave" or a "girlfriend material" type of girl. Both can be good in their own categories but are not to be confused and are appealing in totally different ways. While everyone has a different taste to me that's the difference between the second chick from this thread and the girl that I posted in the other thread.
I mean - from my experience most men with brains admire the "hot chick" type but end up being with the second type of girls.

Bobby, I'm not that critical in real life, actually I'm not very critical about other people unless I'm joking but since it's the internet and we're judging chicks "that would make my jaw drop" I need moar

 

[Duke]

Goddammit thats unsettling. Took me a while to figure it out too :\

 

[keco52]

I think most men describe it either objectively as "a hot chick to fuck and leave" or a "girlfriend material" type of girl. Both can be good in their own categories but are not to be confused and are appealing in totally different ways. While everyone has a different taste to me that's the difference between the second chick from this thread and the girl that I posted in the other thread.
I mean - from my experience most men with brains admire the "hot chick" type but end up being with the second type of girls.

To be fair this was girls that make your jaw drop and the other was who you would date but still I don't understand what makes these girls the "hot chick you fvck and leave" ? They're not girlfriend material bc they're fit? Or bc she has a slut look on her face? The girl in the 2nd pic doesn't even look like the hot chick type...she looks like the girl next door type to me.

Anyway to stay on topic if I were gay....

 

[Pittsey]

To be fair this was girls that make your jaw drop and the other was who you would date but still I don't understand what makes these girls the "hot chick you fvck and leave" ? They're not girlfriend material bc they're fit? Or bc she has a slut look on her face? The girl in the 2nd pic doesn't even look like the hot chick type...she looks like the girl next door type to me.

Most men (not Seb obviously) are very shallow and will sleep with anything that isn't fat or grotesque. Although some will do fat and grotesque too. But there is a big gap between women that are fit enough to shag and women that are girlfriend material...! I am very picky about who I'd date and have only really had 2 relationships... But I have slept with more.

 

[keco52]

^but to me Masta was basically saying "I wouldn't date those girls bc they're too sexy"

I think it might come down to cultural differences in what we find attractive. Bc I agree with Aron and Sofi in this thread but not Sandeep, Woody, Masta. It's not even that I don't find them attractive I think they are unattractive. I do agree with Seb and Bobby usually though. :? I think it's interesting.

 

[masta247]

^but to me Masta was basically saying "I wouldn't date those girls bc they're too sexy"

Not at all. What I've meant was that they have sexy bodies but nothing more than that in my opinion. They are just sexy.
That girl in the other thread isn't sexy but there's something cute about her. A very nice face and a specific look in her eye.
A sexy body is a shallow "I want to go to bed with her" thing. And if it comes to a serious relationship then there's no use with a sexy body other than a potentially more appealing sexual life.
They probably won't be that sexy in a few years and they'll have nothing to offer anyway, while that look in someone's eye is a thing of beauty to me, even if a person gets old it usually remains there.
A totally different feeling which is worth much more to me. (as gay as it might sound).
These girls from this thread imo don't have anything special about them. They look "only sexy" and that's about it. Attractive bed-wise, sure I'd probably like to sleep with them but probably wouldn't like to keep dating girls like them for anything else than sex.

These are 2 totally different ways of being attractive in my opinion. One that makes your groin react and feel some sort of "desire" and the other one which makes you feel nice about looking at her.
A girl might not be "hot" at all and be beautiful, a great start for a girlfriend material.
And personally I might be strange but I think that I stopped admiring that "hotness" much when I turned 20 or so. Sure I can tell whenever I see a fit ass but that's it, when I'm serious I'm looking at girls in a different way.
I think it works for most men in a similar way, more or less. At least those who expect more than sex.

 

[keco52]

^The girl in the 2nd pic isn't even trying to be sexy. I don't even know why I'm arguing...I shouldn't be directly offended but for some reason I am.

 

[masta247]

^The girl in the 2nd pic isn't even trying to be sexy. I don't even know why I'm arguing...I shouldn't be directly offended but for some reason I am.

Don't be. I'm not saying that she is trying to be sexy, she just has a sexy body and that's it. There's nothing special about her other than that. And that's my main point.

Maybe you really care about body that much and that's why you feel that way.

 

[keco52]

Don't be. I'm not saying that she is trying to be sexy, she just has a sexy body and that's it. There's nothing special about her other than that. And that's my main point.

Maybe you really care about body that much and that's why you feel that way.

*ahem* but you're saying that like it's a bad thing? If anything we're equally superficial...you admiring facial beauty and me admiring the body. They'll both deteriorate with age.

edit-also I feel like you're associating a pretty face with virginal sweet heart qualities but your disney channel chicks are just as likely as any other chick to be a whore

 

[Flipmo]

I like both.

 

[Chronic]

Some women, like pornstars, have an appeal that simply makes you want to have sex with them. They're pretty much blow-up dolls brought to life for the sole purpose of giving you physical pleasure. They make you want to do things to them that might make you ashamed of yourself (not really) and you definitely wouldn't respect them afterwards for allowing you do that to them (which is of course hypocritical but that's the way it is). Any fantasy you had about them would be the equivelant of hardcore porn. Other women have qualities that make you want to get to know them and makes you wonder about their likes/dislikes, their thoughts, their opinions. Sexual fantasies might be more softcore porn but there would be other fantasies that include them as an actual person. How nice it would be to just sit on the couch while she's wearing sweats. It makes you want to take care of them, see them smile, see them happy, see them doing things they like. They make you want them to be your girlfriend as opposed to just bringing out lust in you. The first type of attractiveness gives women attention that they shouldn't crave. It's not like I'm ashamed of anything but a woman's attractiveness often gets in the way of seeming them as an actual person. When they have a cute appearance it automatically makes them more human to me.

That's kind of an extreme, black and white version of what it's like for me. It will be different for different guys. I have difficulty respecting women who are overtly sexual, even though I know it shouldn't be that way. A 'slutty' appearance, or a face/posture that just screams 'fuck me' doesn't equal girlfriend material for me. A lot of guys don't have any problems with it though.

Also, I don't think masta was saying a hot body was a bad thing but you don't hold a conversation with a body, you hold it with a face (not technically of course but you know what I mean).

I feel like you're associating a pretty face with virginal sweet heart qualities

Probably true. I think we all need some sort of illusion to be with another person. If you see a woman swearing like a sailor, chain-smoking and farting it kind of destroys that illusion. Which is why women don't go to the bathroom. SHUT UP. I've heard stories of guys crying after sex. If a woman is completely turned off by the guy afterwards I might think 'that's cruel' for a second (if a girl cried after sex I probably wouldn't feel good about myself, I wouldn't feel bad about her) but I understand that women need a guy to be 'manly' and crying in such an instance isn't that. Pretty much the same thing.

 

[THEV1LL4N]

many people can see the hotness or sexiness in girls, but when there's something special about a certain girl, only you might see that quality inside them. i think that this is what masta is getting at, it makes that something special all the more worthwhile if you are with that girl with the special thing going on.

 

[keco52]

^@ Chronic: I understand what you're saying completely...but the girls I posted weren't being overtly sexy. If I posted a girl bent over and half naked I could understand what he's saying.

So then my question can a girl be sexy and beautiful? Because I think the girls I posted are. I think the girl that Aron posted is. Some of the girls that Sofi posted are. or is appearing sexy an automatic disqualification...like the mother of my kids can't have a sexy body?

This is almost seeming like a madonna-whore complex to me. Like you can't be sexually attracted to your spouse.

or

You have the "good" woman that you marry and then *some* guys have the "bad" girls they still f*ck on the side.

 

[Pittsey]

She was in her underwear wasn't she? She is trying to be sexy....


Girls can be sexy and beautiful. I am hard to please. I look for a sexy girl, and a beautiful girl.... She also needs to have a personality that goes with mine, and doesn't jump into bed with me. If I slept with a girl after the first few dates, complete turn off.

 

[keco52]

No she was not in her underwear. Pitts I don't feel u value women much anyway....they're just a warm hole that u can replace

 

[Chronic]

^@ Chronic: I understand what you're saying completely...but the girls I posted weren't being overtly sexy. If I posted a girl bent over and half naked I could understand what he's saying.

So then my question can a girl be sexy and beautiful? Because I think the girls I posted are. I think the girl that Aron posted is. Some of the girls that Sofi posted are. or is appearing sexy an automatic disqualification...like the mother of my kids can't have a sexy body?

This is almost seeming like a madonna-whore complex to me. Like you can't be sexually attracted to your spouse.

or

You have the "good" woman that you marry and then *some* guys have the "bad" girls they still f*ck on the side.

Maybe masta meant 'sexual' instead of sexy. I want my wife to be a virgin and I'll beat her if she loses her virginity. However I'll also beat her if she doesn't put out. I'm a complex man.