Paris names street after Mumia Abu-Jamal

Devious

New Member
Nov 30, 2003
4,894
70
0
46
Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada
Visit site
Paris suburb names street for cop-killer Abu-Jamal
By Jennifer Lin
Inquirer Staff Writer

As Philadelphians cope with another police slaying, news comes that a suburb of Paris has named a street for Mumia Abu-Jamal, convicted of the 1981 murder of Police Officer Daniel Faulkner.

Hundreds of supporters of Abu-Jamal attended a ceremony on April 29 to dedicate the Rue Mumia-Abu Jamal in the city of St.-Denis.

"In France, they see him as a towering figure," said Suzanne Ross, cochair of the Free Mumia Coalition of New York City, who was part of the ceremony.

Ross said the street is in the town's Human Rights district, which includes Nelson Mandela Stadium.

Richard Costello, past president of the Philadelphia lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police, said the street dedication was "deplorable" but "consistent with the offensive position the French have taken in this matter. They've made him into some type of hero."

Abu-Jamal, 53, was sentenced to death in 1982 for the shooting of Faulkner, who was 25. A memorial plaque honoring Faulkner has been installed at 13th and Locust Streets, where he was shot.

Abu-Jamal, a former Philadelphia journalist, Black Panther member, and critic of police brutality, has maintained his innocence.

Last year, a federal appeals court agreed to consider Abu-Jamal's appeal of his conviction. The court said it would consider Abu-Jamal's allegation of racial bias in jury selection, as well as claims that the prosecutor gave an improper summation and that a judge in a previous appeal was biased.

The street naming in St.-Denis was part of a three-day event sponsored by the French city, Ross said.

She said there were speakers on such issues as the death penalty, human rights, the Abu-Jamal case, and the 1985 bombing of the MOVE headquarters in West Philadelphia.

Ross said Pam and Ramona Africa, MOVE leaders and supporters of Abu-Jamal, spoke about the "unfulfilled quest for justice in that case."

When notified of the French dedication, Maureen Faulkner, widow of the victim, called it "disgusting."

"This is so unnerving for me to get this news," Faulkner said from Los Angeles, where she lives. "It's insulting to the police officers of Philadelphia that they are naming a street after a murderer."

The campaign to free Abu-Jamal has generated international attention, particularly among anti-death-penalty activists in France. At the dedication ceremony, Julia Wright, a translator in Paris and daughter of the late African American author Richard Wright, called Abu-Jamal "our Mandela."

Maureen Faulkner, on the other hand, urged Americans to boycott Paris.

"The people of Philadelphia should think if they have any trips to Paris this summer, to cancel those trips," Faulkner said.

Of the French support of Abu-Jamal, she added: "These are the people who sheltered Ira Einhorn" - a fugitive who was finally returned to Philadelphia and convicted of killing his girlfriend, Holly Maddux.

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/14587429.htm
 
lol Fuck mumia abul jamal with a big middle finger. many people in jail are wrongly convicted, any person who knows this case and is not a fucking loser who cant think for themselves but actually looks at the case, knows this man is a piece of shit on earth playing the race card. guilty fuckin scum bag.
 
^^ I wouldn't be so quick to denounce it like that. There are definitely some shady things in that case.


Maureen Faulkner, on the other hand, urged Americans to boycott Paris.

"The people of Philadelphia should think if they have any trips to Paris this summer, to cancel those trips," Faulkner said.
Seriously, what the fuck? Is that all Americans can do when they disagree with something? Boycott it?

I bet the city of light is really going to suffer from Elmo and Thelma not going to visit there coming summer. :laugh:
 
PuffnScruff said:
for instance...?

The whole trial?

I'm not really saying he's innocent. He prolly did it. But the trial was handled very poorly. One would expect something better from the bastion of democracy.
 
Duke said:
The whole trial?

I'm not really saying he's innocent. He prolly did it. But the trial was handled very poorly. One would expect something better from the bastion of democracy.

i dont know much about the trial, just that the evidence is extremely hard to deny he didnt do it, but what do you think was wrong with the trial.
 
PuffnScruff said:
i dont know much about the trial, just that the evidence is extremely hard to deny he didnt do it, but what do you think was wrong with the trial.
Last year, a federal appeals court agreed to consider Abu-Jamal's appeal of his conviction. The court said it would consider Abu-Jamal's allegation of racial bias in jury selection, as well as claims that the prosecutor gave an improper summation and that a judge in a previous appeal was biased.

well this part for starters. i agree with Duke, there is a lot of evidence that may point to him doing it, but he was railroaded in the trial and my feeling is that even without the evidence they had he would have been convicted anyway. a judge wouldnt consider his appeal if there hadn't been something wrong with his trial
 
but even if there was jury bias, there were still witnesses and plenty of other evidence that supports he murdered the officer, so what do they want? another trial? the evidence and witnesses arent going to change at all. whats the point of wasting time and money just to get the same results?
 
well the question is, if they had all this great evidence and all these witnesses, then why did they stack the deck so much against him by using a biased jury and so forth. aren't Americans entitled to a fair trial? i dont see how that is a waste of money to give a man who maintains his innocence, whether it's true or not that he is innocent, a chance at a fair trial.
 
PuffnScruff said:
But is there any proof of the claims against the jury?
well there must be some validity to the claims or else the court wouldnt be considering it. i do know he was convicted by an all white jury, whether they were biased i cant speak on that. but clearly there must be some reason why the court is considering his appeal
 
That could be why they claim bias, the all white jury. I don't feel that just because a jury is all one color that means they were bias in there conclusion of the case, but would def help to get an appeal. It should be interesting the see how they prove the jury was biased.
 
well the claim isnt really that the jury was biased, but that the court was biased in the selection of the jury (excluding black jurors, etc.) but this is only one part of the appeal, there is also the claim that the prosecutor gave an improper summation to the jury, which is grounds enough for an appeal
 
I remember I took an interest to this case a while back and read through all the material I could find. If I recall correctly there were some irregularities such as Mumias gun bein .38 caliber and the bullet in Faulkners head was actually a .44-caliber. The court stenographer also came out and claimed she heard the judge say "I will help fry the nigger" or something like that. IMO, he probably did it but there are still some shady circumstances surrounding the whole thing.
 
Shahin said:
I remember I took an interest to this case a while back and read through all the material I could find. If I recall correctly there were some irregularities such as Mumias gun bein .38 caliber and the bullet in Faulkners head was actually a .44-caliber. The court stenographer also came out and claimed she heard the judge say "I will help fry the nigger" or something like that. IMO, he probably did it but there are still some shady circumstances surrounding the whole thing.

That's not really an "irregularity" :p. That's solid proof the bullet didn't come from Mumia's gun.

However, the gun found on Mumia matched the bullet in Faulkner's head and was confirmed through ballistics tests etc etc.

He probably did it. The point is, we're talking eighties here. Black cabby kills white cop. People didn't care for a fair trial, they just wanted to "get rid of the nigger", to put it like that. And as such I don't think he really got a fair trial. Redo the trial? I don't know, seems a bit like a waste of time and money, but in principle shit should get redone.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.