1. Pac's "inevitable journey back to jail" was the result of the fight he had the night he was shot. The whole operation was probably already set in place by then.
This gang probably had ties with some Police Department. That Police Department probably had ties with some bigger agnecy.
Very probably the Crips themselves, which also links well with the fact that Orlando Anderson just happened to be in the MGM that night with no apparent reason at all..
Dont get all Shakesperian on me !!!
Pac was acquited of the sodomy charge. It was a "sexual harrasment" case he was convicted of.Morris said:Pac was out on bail pending appeal. Even if he hadn't violated his parole by beating Anderson that night, he was probably still headed back for the sodomy case.
I dont wanna really keep discussing this. This is something i believe might have happened, and obviously u dont. I cant convince u of something i dont have any proof of. The difference between us is that i dont really need proof. What i believe in naturally implies the none existence of proofs, because "agencies" have been pulling out much larger hits/operations throuought the whole world without leaving a trace, and usually leaving many as scape goats.. So all what you're saying, it's probably true. But it doesnt totally negate the possibility of what i think might have happened.Morris said:And it'd be a rather large coincidence that the government was planning to use gang members to pull a hit on Pac the very same night that Pac punked a Crip in the MGM Lobby. Talk about grasping at straws.
According to your theory, someone had a Southside Compton set of gang members pull a hit in Las Vegas. Do you not see the problem with this? That would require LV Metro, probably the Compton police, and who knows who else all in on it. Why would Compton Crips have ties to Las Vegas cops?
So who killed Biggie?!Morris said:... Compare Pac's shooting to the aim by whoever killed Biggie.
Maybe.. maybe not.. But to my knowledge, none of them came from a family of Black Panthers, Activists and "Political Prisonners".. Maybe none of them had the edge that Pac had, and maybe i say this cause i'm a crazed Pac fan, but i dont see any of them having as much status and power as Pac had in 96..lii said:so now ur saying 2pac would be killed by "the agency" bcuz he had the potential to be a threat but there are SOO many ppl who have and had the potential... public enemy changed laws, they had potential, same with nwa and all they got was a letter, the list goes on.
Not that this is anyhow similar, but u know, this is what they said to Copernicus when he said that the Sun was the center of the solar system, and not the Earth.. This is what they said to Gallileo when he said that the Earth is round and not flat.. This is what they said to men who believed that, one day, humans will fly.. This is what they said to people who believed that, one day, humans will step on the moon....lii said:ur reaching and its kinda dillusional
Pac was acquited of the sodomy charge. It was a "sexual harrasment" case he was convicted of.
What i believe in naturally implies the none existence of proofs, because "agencies" have been pulling out much larger hits/operations throuought the whole world without leaving a trace,
So who killed Biggie?!
this is what they said to Copernicus when he said that the Sun was the center of the solar system, and not the Earth.. This is what they said to Gallileo when he said that the Earth is round and not flat..
)maybe i say this cause i'm a crazed Pac fan,
Man what the hell are u talking about?!!!! Look, i may have used some wrong terminology in the word "harassment" instead of "abuse", but seriously, u never read about the case nor watched the "Resurrection" movie at least?!! And how in God's name is Sodomy = "the forcible touching of the girl's ass"???Morris said:No. First of all Pac wasn't acquitted of any charge. The rape charge was dropped to sodomy - the forcible touching of the girl's ass. He was convicted of it and thus sentenced.
Sexual harassment was never a part of the charges.
WIKIPEDIA said:Sodomy: [...]The term is most commonly used to describe the specific act of anal sex between two males or a male and a female.
Clearly hands/touching make no part of sodomy's definition.http://www.gaylib.com/text/clas12.htm said:Sodomy is most commonly legally defined as any contact between the genitals of one person, and the mouth or anus of another.
Also, in the Resurrection movie, at one point when Pac is walking out of the courthouse at night, he's asked some questions by a female reporter (this footage was also used in the UTEOT video clip). Basically, from what i remember, she asks him if he was acquitted of the "sodomy" charges, and he tells her "yes, cause they couldn't find any semen, and no forcible entry to the anus" or smth very close to that. So this interview clearly ties the "semen" and "anal entry" to the "sodomy" charges, meaning that sodomy is not "touching the ass"!!!WIKIPEDIA said:In December 1993, Shakur was charged with sexually abusing a woman in his hotel room. According to the complaint, Shakur sodomized the woman and then encouraged his friends to sexually abuse her. Shakur vehemently denied the charges.
[...]
The day following the (shooting) incident, December 1, 1994, Shakur entered the courthouse in a wheelchair and was found guilty of three counts of "sexual abuse (forcibly touching the buttocks)", but innocent of six others, including sodomy.
No, those were not traces.. Traces usually lead to somewhere. Those were worthless "facts" and "material" that were presented as traces.. I am from a country that a year and a half ago witnessed a major assassination (one hell of a car blast) which left all kind of evidence and traces. Thousands of them actually, from DNA, to body parts, to car wrecks, to witnesses, to etc... And to this day, a team of more than a 100 of United Nations, German/Belgium, U.S and international detectives still cant find an effective and useful clue. So traces are always left behind, but their quality and how incriminating are those traces is what really matters. And in Pac's case, clearly they had no real value as they didn't lead to any prosecution, let alone conviction.Morris said:Which is why it would make no sense to leave so many traces, like a caravan and public street's worth of potential witnesses, the shell casings, the image and make of the car used etc. A well planned hit would never go off so sloppily.
ReallyMorris said:Perhaps this is the case where you should be looking for crooked cop connections :thumb:
?!! And did Suge by any means have anything to do with this?!1st, not all of their "theories" were accurately based on scientific facts. But in general, yes, most of them were.Morris said:Their observations were based on scientific findings of fact. You admittedly are basing your assumptions on theories that naturally have nonexistent evidence.
True that. Actually, i knew that Galileo said that the earth revolved around the sun, but i also thought he said the earth was round, but i was probably wrong. Maybe it was Magellan or Christoph Columbus who 1st established ("by practice") that the earth was round.. I'm not sure (although Columbus never really established this fact "by practice", as he never reached India).Morris said:(And for the record, Galileo was persecuted for saying the Earth revolved around the sun)
"Tupac Shakur has perhaps one of the largest personal legacies of any hip hop artist in history. The music and messages in his work pervaded the styles of the following generations and his music had great impact all over the nation and world. At a Mobb Deep concert following the death of the famed icon and release of his '7 day theory' album, Cormega recalled in an interview that the fans were all shouting 'Makaveli', and emphasised the influence of Tupac even in New York at the height of the media-dubbed 'Inter-coastal rivalry'."Morris said:Bingo. A lot of people on this board overstate Pac's significance nationally.
So basically, as i said, he was acquitted of the "sodomy" charges. Actually, this is a well known fact, and i think you've got things mixed up, mainly due to your wrong understanding of the word "sodomy"
Traces lead somewhere. And in Pac's case, clearly they had no real value as they didn't lead to any prosecution, let alone conviction.
omgwtflol said:nazi reminds me of the 'death' forum
?!!
:laugh:' !!!