Film & TV Microsoft owns IPOD

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
#1
Microsoft Invented the iPod?
By: César A. Berardini - "Cesar"
Aug. 15th, 2005 12:16 pm
Shocking news and a new chapter in the digital music wars. The United States Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a March 2004 patent application by Apple Computer for the iPod.
Apple's patent for a "graphical user interface and methods of use thereof in a multimedia player" was rejected last month and the patent examiner cited in the ruling an earlier application by Microsoft, filed after the iPod was introduced but before Apple sought its own patent.

"It's incredibly embarrassing," said industry analyst Rob Enderle. "That just makes it look like someone at Apple wasn't on the ball in terms of filing the patent at the right time."

Natalie Kerris, Apple spokeswoman, said the company invented and publicly released the iPod interface before the Microsoft patent application,
as cited by USPTO in its ruling.

"Apple has received many patents for inventions related to iPod, and has many more patents pending," Kerris said. "The U.S. patent process is often a lengthy one, involving much back and forth with the U.S. patent office. Apple will continue to pursue this patent application, as well as the many others covering iPod innovations."

Microsoft has stated that they don’t have any plans to block iPod sales. David Kaefer, Business Development Director for Microsoft's Intellectual Property and Licensing Group said:

"We have a long-standing practice of licensing things to Apple and licensing Apple's patents to use in our products. Our approach is to recognize that, frankly, we're both mutually dependent on the good ideas of one another."

The patent is discussion is the one John C Platt, a Microsoft employee, filed on behalf of the software giant for a “system for automatically generating music playlists based on one or more seed songs selected by a user.” The invention by Platt was called “Auto DJ”. This patent does not affect the clickwheel featured in the iPod.


xPod 360?

Although this patent doesn’t affect the right for Apple to sell the iPod, Apple might have to pay Microsoft royalties for every iPod it sells. More interesting, Microsoft could sell its own iPod variation as long as it does not infringe in any patent granted to Apple. Lawyers could also reach an agreement between both companies so Microsoft could use Apple patents and vice versa.

Earlier this year, Microsoft tapped Robbie Bach, Chief Xbox Officer and Senior Vice President of the Home and Entertainment Division, to revamp the company's digital-music strategy and compete better with Apple and its iPod, iTunes music service.


We can’t wait to learn what Bach and Microsoft are preparing in order to compete with Apple and its iPod portable music player.

Stay tuned. We’ll have more on Apple, Microsoft and iPod as it develops.
LOL, stupid Apple. Bad business!
 
#3
Although this patent doesn’t affect the right for Apple to sell the iPod, Apple might have to pay Microsoft royalties for every iPod it sells. More interesting, Microsoft could sell its own iPod variation as long as it does not infringe in any patent granted to Apple. Lawyers could also reach an agreement between both companies so Microsoft could use Apple patents and vice versa.
lol apple got pwned bigtime.
 
#12
Vaudeville said:
yes, yes you are. I flash my iPod mini at people and they are all up on me. I have to carry bodyguards around now :thumb:


careful with that shit eh, ppl in t-dot get JUMPED for them iPods.





Sucks on Apple's side, i guess you gotta have your shit organized and everything. But god-damn for Microsoft for jumping all over that shit tho. Pure envy. Oh well...strickly business.
 
#13
PELLA said:
careful with that shit eh, ppl in t-dot get JUMPED for them iPods.





Sucks on Apple's side, i guess you gotta have your shit organized and everything. But god-damn for Microsoft for jumping all over that shit tho. Pure envy. Oh well...strickly business.
yeah i heard here in T.O they are after the nice sleek ipods. though i would put up a fight.
 
#14
^ lol, i dunno man. They usually come strapped with something. If i were you, id get rid of those white ear-piece's and get serious headphones, but hey, thats just me. How are those things anyway? worth coppin' one?
 
#15
PELLA said:
^ lol, i dunno man. They usually come strapped with something. If i were you, id get rid of those white ear-piece's and get serious headphones, but hey, thats just me. How are those things anyway? worth coppin' one?
Yeah they are worth it man. I got the mini 4g like 700-800 songs, which is perfect for me. My collection is quiet small so no need for massive storage capacity. They are easy to use and the look man, they just look nice.

P.S nah man i flash my earphones like cash! :D
 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
#19
Get In The Van I Have Candy said:
Apparently you don't know how much the ipod is selling compared to the Zen. If the Zen was the shit there would be alot more in the streets but yet I only see the ipods...
IPod have been over commercialized. Zen has not had huge commercials with the 'Gorillaz' and 'Black Eyed Peas' performing in the background. Many Ipod buyers just got an Ipod for the fact that they were 'sold' by all the Advertisement. It's the hype that made it sell wild. Also, I've seen people with Ipod who are 15 and younger. Alot of them actually are. It's just the cool and styling thing at the moment.

Just because something selling at a huge rate doesn't mean it's better.

Would you compare 50 Cent's 'The Massacre' and Masta Ace's 'A Long Hot Summer' and say the 50 Cent album was better because it sold more? No. It was just hyped up, that's why it sold more even when it was a pile of crap.

I would trust Creative more then I'd trust Apple. Creative's field of expertise as always been sound. When it comes to soundcards for someputers and even speakers and soundsystems for cars.

Get someone with an IPod and Zen, I can assure you he will say he's happier with his Zen.

Peace.
 
#20
FlipMo said:
IPod have been over commercialized. Zen has not had huge commercials with the 'Gorillaz' and 'Black Eyed Peas' performing in the background. Many Ipod buyers just got an Ipod for the fact that they were 'sold' by all the Advertisement. It's the hype that made it sell wild. Also, I've seen people with Ipod who are 15 and younger. Alot of them actually are. It's just the cool and styling thing at the moment.

Just because something selling at a huge rate doesn't mean it's better.

Would you compare 50 Cent's 'The Massacre' and Masta Ace's 'A Long Hot Summer' and say the 50 Cent album was better because it sold more? No. It was just hyped up, that's why it sold more even when it was a pile of crap.

I would trust Creative more then I'd trust Apple. Creative's field of expertise as always been sound. When it comes to soundcards for someputers and even speakers and soundsystems for cars.

Get someone with an IPod and Zen, I can assure you he will say he's happier with his Zen.

Peace.
But if something sells, that something will stay in the market more longer than something that does not sell. And if that something does not sell then why keep it in the market? Hence your comparison with 50 cent and masta ace.

Apple is not stupid they know advertisement sells, especially when they have stars backing the ipod up. For me it is the simple interface that I love. It's easy to transfer music and there are more accessories for the ipod than any other mp3 based player. The "fad" with the ipod is still strong after so many years with the sales of the ipod the stock of apple computers has been going up. Last time I checked it was at $46 dollars per share. I remember when there was no ipod their stock was at $15 a share. To tell you the truth I have never seen a zen in my years owning an ipod.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top