7 Syns said:This gives me hope because maybe Charles Manson is innocent too??
peace.
HAHAHA :thumb:

I jus hav to add, nice im at 33 posts
7 Syns said:This gives me hope because maybe Charles Manson is innocent too??
peace.

Obviously Micheal is messed up mentally, this obviosly stems from his childhood and the way he was raised, this doesn't make him guilty. How can you call people blind, a court of Law says he is innocent, is that too hard to comprehend.Saint33 said:the man is obviously messed up. It jus bugs me how blind sum peeps can be, the guy obviously did it.
Why don't you backup what you say rather then dropping comments with not a single piece of evidence?haunted said:How do you figure?
How the fuck am i supposed to back it up? Im not a detective. The guy is guilty, he only got off because he is famous. And what evidence have you provided? The fact that he wasnt convicted? If so, i wont take any of your posts seriously :thumb: .tupacmansion said:Why don't you backup what you say rather then dropping comments with not a single piece of evidence?
Of course your not detective and of course you have no evidence in regards to this case. This gives you no right to call him a child molestor.haunted said:How the fuck am i supposed to back it up? Im not a detective.
The guy is guilty, he only got off because he is famous.
Its your job to prove his guilt, not my job to prove his innocence. Innocent until proven guilty. You must have some serious hatred for MJ, don't hate someone for the sake of hating them. Look at the facts.And what evidence have you provided?
tupacmansion said:Its your job to prove his guilt, not my job to prove his innocence. Innocent until proven guilty. You must have some serious hatred for MJ, don't hate someone for the sake of hating them. Look at the facts.
Saint33 said:We do hav some serious hate for him. I hate ne sick fuck who has sex wit kids. Im gettin tired of people sayin he didnt do it. Hes bin blamed twice for it, jus cuz ther wasnt enuf evidence to legally get away wit it, doesnt mean ther wasnt enough evidence tha wud obviously make it true. He wudnt be blamed twice for it if he didnt do it. And if u say cuz hes famous and because people want his money, ur dumb. U think people jus make these plans to get money, it wudnt happen twice, like y wud it happen to Micheal twice and its never happened to the 100s of other celebrities out ther. Like i sed before ud hav to be blind to not realise hes guilty. Actually blind, def and retard.

haunted said:How the fuck am i supposed to back it up? Im not a detective. The guy is guilty, he only got off because he is famous. And what evidence have you provided? The fact that he wasnt convicted? If so, i wont take any of your posts seriously :thumb: .
PuffnScruff said:most likely you only know what the biased media is telling you. or what you hear from your friends in high school.
look your 15 and really, you dont know anything about the law, how the legal system works, or anything at all for that matter. just shut the fuck up! :thumb:![]()
Rukas said:It just goes to show that in the media, Michael was guilty from the start.
Chronic said:The people who are complaining need to shut the fuck up. You don't know he's guilty, you're merely speculating. You don't know the jury's reasons for letting him off. You don't know all the evidence. You don't know shit.