jm5471 said:http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/13/jackson.trial/index.html
hopefully they can toss this sick fuck in a cell
Glockmatic said:Count 1: Not Guilty of Conspiracy.
Count 2: Not Guilty of Child Molestation
Count 3: Not Guilty of Lewd Act [Child Molestation]
Count 4: Not Guilty of Lewd Act [Child Molestation]
Count 5: Not Guilty of Lewd Act [Chold Molestation]
Count 6: Not Guilty Attempted Child Molestation
Count 7: Not Guilty of Administering Intoxicating Agent (Felony)
Count 8: Not Guilty of Administering Intoxicating Agent (Lesser Charge)
Count 9: Not Guilty of Administering Intoxication Agent (Not Guilty of giving alcohol to persons under 21)
Count 10: Not Guilty of Administering Intoxication Agent (Felony)
beReal said:bwuahahahha...Owned
a good defence team.don't hate they didnt have enough proof.he was found innocentjm5471 said:owned the sick bastard got away cause of the same reasons as OJ, not much more 2 say
jm5471 said:owned the sick bastard got away cause of the same reasons as OJ, not much more 2 say

jm5471 said:im not hatin on anyhting but come on its the same charges that he had 10 years ago, its pretty pathetic that they let him go cause hes famous ne one else wit this much evidence against them would have been thrown in jail the first time that there wrer accusations against them
My_Dyin_Day04 said:Well done Jacko (I hope there was no paying off done) Jacko: Not Guilty!
Illuminattile said:I was REALLY hoping I'd get to hear Michael say:
"I would have got away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids"
:thumb: