i was listening to the song today and he came to a part and says "Death is for a son to stay free" (between 1:34-1:36) what does that line mean? does anyone?
madcower3 said:i was listening to the song today and he came to a part and says "Death is for a son to stay free" (between 1:34-1:36) what does that line mean? does anyone?
lyrics are usually transcribed by englishmen with shit for brains. don't hate me.madcower3 said:im pretty sure it says "death is for a son to stay free" check the lyrics section or on any lyrics site. Does anyone know what this means though
HipHop77 said:yo guy, you do not have have the ability to interpret vocabulary. bitch
i jus listened to the song, word i dont know HOW tha fuck you get, "death is for a son stay free" why would pac even say that, its "DEATH BEFORE DISHONOUR STAY FREE, IM THUGGED OUT FUCK THA WORLD CUZ THIS IS HOW THEY MADE ME"!<--- shitz real as fuck
tch, ya got sum wax buildup up in this ma'fucka
oh yeah n for tha record, i didnt read tha thread, jus tha first post. so if it seems like i repeated something, fuck you.
omgwtflol said:It's not wise to admit you didn't read the thread. It makes you look like an idiot. This is the second time I've seen you admit that. The other thread, I can understand not reading the WHOLE thing, it's pretty long with detailed posts, but come on, this thread wasn't even a page long and none of the posts were long.
There's no need to be insulting, either.
No, I think he understands the situation completely. You don't have to read the entire thread, but if you're going to make a post and say something that has a pretty good chance of already having been said, then it might be wise to read them anyway, because then you too look like an idiot by saying something that was already posted a week before you even read the thread. Or does reading for 45 seconds give you too much of a headache?HipHop77 said:OMGWTFLOL, ya jus dont understand, aint much more to it.
DeeezNuuuts83 said:No, I think he understands the situation completely. You don't have to read the entire thread, but if you're going to make a post and say something that has a pretty good chance of already having been said, then it might be wise to read them anyway, because then you too look like an idiot by saying something that was already posted a week before you even read the thread. Or does reading for 45 seconds give you too much of a headache?
And you don't have to be a jerk to someone who might've asked a dumb question, there's no need to be a little internet bad boy and diss people left and right about a song that came out when you yourself were six years old. Besides, it's not like he said his favorite song was "What'z Ya Phone #" or something.
DeeezNuuuts83 said:No, I think he understands the situation completely. You don't have to read the entire thread, but if you're going to make a post and say something that has a pretty good chance of already having been said, then it might be wise to read them anyway, because then you too look like an idiot by saying something that was already posted a week before you even read the thread. Or does reading for 45 seconds give you too much of a headache?
And you don't have to be a jerk to someone who might've asked a dumb question, there's no need to be a little internet bad boy and diss people left and right about a song that came out when you yourself were six years old. Besides, it's not like he said his favorite song was "What'z Ya Phone #" or something.
marc said:deeez, be careful, or he might e-blast you !
ps: i know the question might sound stupid, but please remember there are a whole lot of people that are NO native speakers. sometimes its really hard to get it.