Johnny Cochran's Tombstone

[PaulyPac]

lol

 

[not really ken]

fake

 

[PaulyPac]

yes i think everyone knows that, but thanks for pointing it out

 

[not really ken]

^ok, like it was proved that the whale penis was a fake. Everyone believed that one didn't they. It's not enough to even point out the truth nowadays. people believe whatever conforms to their wishes

 

[PaulyPac]

ken stay off the drugs..

 

[tHuG $TyLe]

Its real!!!!!!111!!

 

[Default MX]

That proves it! OJ DID IT!

 

[SicC]

funny idea.

pz

 

[CalcuoCuchicheo]

(Disclaimer: I am a sheep)

OMFG!!! He did do it!!

I knew it too....well I'm glad Johnnie finally manned up, guess they can't disbar you when you're dead!

Well, it wouldn't matter if they could.......

 

[Chronic]

^ok, like it was proved that the whale penis was a fake. Everyone believed that one didn't they. It's not enough to even point out the truth nowadays. people believe whatever conforms to their wishes

That's a louzy comparison and you know it!

 

[roadsense]

everyone on these boards and their mamas know OJ didnt do it!! thats a stupid rumor that got out of hand, just like the alive theory for tupac. NOW hows that for comparison!

 

[vg4030]

i fuckin knew the bastard was guilty

 

[Devious]

everyone on these boards and their mamas know OJ didnt do it!! thats a stupid rumor that got out of hand, just like the alive theory for tupac. NOW hows that for comparison!

More like everybody and their mamas know that he did do it. It's pretty obvious he's guilty, if you knew anything about criminology or profiling you would see this :thumb:

 

[imported_MAKaveli_10]

Thats pretty funny. Johnny was probably the smartest man in the world. He got OJ aquitted.

 

[reeses_pieces]

lol

 

[H.E. Pennypacker]

More like everybody and their mamas know that he did do it. It's pretty obvious he's guilty, if you knew anything about criminology or profiling you would see this :thumb:

If you knew anything about criminal profiling, you'd know its not a science. There's absolutely nothing definite about profiling. One expert will contradict another. It can be reliable at times, but it can also seriously throw off investigators. Take, for example, the sniper shootings in the VA area several years ago.

If you looked at the OJ case with sincere intentions and a thirst for the truth, you may very well see that he's innocent. I can't say he's innocent or guilty, because I am not an expert on the case, but I am not going to become an animal by following what everyone else says.

It is very reasonable to say that OJ is entirely innocent. I say he's innocent because I assume innocence until there's a enough evidence to say otherwise.

Go ahead and live in your world where someone else tells you what to believe. If you're going to believe OJ is guilty, at least believe it out of deep knowledge on the case.

 

[Luv4Pac4Ever]

If you knew anything about criminal profiling, you'd know its not a science. There's absolutely nothing definite about profiling. One expert will contradict another. It can be reliable at times, but it can also seriously throw off investigators. Take, for example, the sniper shootings in the VA area several years ago.

If you looked at the OJ case with sincere intentions and a thirst for the truth, you may very well see that he's innocent. I can't say he's innocent or guilty, because I am not an expert on the case, but I am not going to become an animal by following what everyone else says.

It is very reasonable to say that OJ is entirely innocent. I say he's innocent because I assume innocence until there's a enough evidence to say otherwise.

Go ahead and live in your world where someone else tells you what to believe. If you're going to believe OJ is guilty, at least believe it out of deep knowledge on the case.

Preach it Pennypacker!
I dunno if he's guilty or not. I'd say not guilty as far as he himself committing the murders, I really don't know that he'd be foolish enough to put his own hands on it, but I think he at least knew about it and that it was gonna happen.

 

[H.E. Pennypacker]

Preach it Pennypacker!
I dunno if he's guilty or not. I'd say not guilty as far as he himself committing the murders, I really don't know that he'd be foolish enough to put his own hands on it, but I think he at least knew about it and that it was gonna happen.

Thanks. I just didn't like how he tried to pull one members that may not be familiar with criminology, but little did he know, there would be someone else who does.

Too often we hear "DNA caught him!," "but an expert profiled him!" or some other cliche. Public schools show throw out useless classes and teach people about crimonology so we don't stand in the dark about how reliable all these methods really are.

At one point, I thought DNA was infallible because of everything I heard. Turns out its not nearly as reliable, and the same goes for almost every method of finding a suspect.