
ImmortalTech said:I Think.. you mean that you would rather smoke Sess than Dro. Its not about weak or potent weed, its just a different method of growing it, which in turn gives u a different final product. Sess gives u a more mellow buzz, and dro gives u a more "im rippped" buzz... Please nobody jump all over me, i dint read that in any sort of book nor did i do any reasearch, I'm just speaking outta general knowledge. So if I'm wrong whatever.
And as for when I'm born doesnt even matter... But possibly before technology and all that shit, to really live a simple life, work hard, and die.
oh and by the way... u can still buy sess (if thats what u meant)

hizzle? said:^^^^ euh... calm down idiot it was a joke...
I mean seriously... Do you have to take everything word for word of what people write on a fucking forum... Christ man, you wrote 3 paragraphs on a sarcastic critic that I wrote...
S O F I said:Well, he called you out on the potency of weed and when Dante pretty much settled the matter, he didn't have much to reply with.![]()
Rukas said:Last time I checked this is a discussion forum, and I cant remember the last time you provided a proper discussion.
FlipMo said:I don't see how Hizzle? is displaying a 'higher than thou attitude' attitude. He just commented which clearly was a joke. Thats just me though.
At for the Sofi.. kinda agree with him, not much to say after Dante kinda settled the issue.
Rukas said:Settled the issue with debatable information? Not taking anything away from Dante, but like I mentioned, that information is disputable and has been; therefore how is he settling the issue? Please explain that to me, how is the issue settled if the information is disputed?
FlipMo said:The weed these days is about 5 times stronger than what was grown in the 70s. Marijuana is being grown to have higher levels of THC to make it more potent. For example, one of the older forms of it grown in Mexico had THC of about 4%, but some of the newer stuff has a THC content closer to 6 to 8%
A new strain from British Columbia called BC bud for example has the THC for 30%
Is this all debatable? Hell yeah it is, everything is debatable, but there is no denying the weed nowadays is much stronger than what was being smoked in the 60s - 70s. That is what I'm kinda getting to.
methods of cultivation have changedRukas said:You cant say that simply because not everyone has access to your stronger weed. Weed strength is dependent on source, and there has always been shit weed and good weed, and there always will be.
Dante said:methods of cultivation have changed
hizzle? said:Fucking Stop Talking About Weed You Motherfuckers!