i think im gonna splurge

Honda Accord coupe looks like it has a Hyundai front end with BMW 3-Series lines running front front to rear with Scion tC tail lights. I'm not a big fan of the thick-spoke wheels.

CTS will take some getting used to, since the original CTS was a great design. It seems like they are incorporating styling elements from the higher end models (like the STS), which in my opinion isn't the greatest thing ever since there won't be as much distinction between the two models.

The IS-F looks too much like an aftermarket rice rocket with that body kit and bulging hood. It just doesn't seem executed well, especially compared to a standard IS350, which I always felt was a beautiful car. It sounds like they've made a new transmission, despite criticism of the current IS350 lacking a manual transmission. I'm not sure if this new one is supposed to be their version of a DSG or basically a more performance-oriented version of the 8-speed in the new Lexus LS. However, I don't think you need 8-speeds in a car that probably won't hit 180 mph. However, I feel that this transmission was placed in there because I imagine that the motor has a really high compression ratio, which tends to lead to an engine with most of its juice being way up top at the cost of a completely flat-yet-high torque curve. I'm not saying it will be torqueless from low revs, but find engines with comparable hp, since most of them will probably have higher peak torque. Then again, we'll have to wait and see.

Evo X is not the best design I've ever seen. It has to be one hell of a driver's car to overcome the odd looks... which it will be. Now that it's "over 300 horsepower" with S-AWC (probably a new term that combines the ACD and S-AYC, which wasn't available in previous U.S.-spec Evos). I'm interested about the actual numbers and other information, since the interior looks pretty cool. I like how the S-AWC button is on the steering wheel (since on mine I hate having to push the button that is somewhat out of the way when I want to switch modes on the fly, which actually does happen). I'm assuming that the button to the left of that might be a switch to manually distribute more or less torque forward or backward. Then again, it might be a volume control button, mysteriously next to a performance feature. Rockford-Fostage audio system should be somewhat decent, but definitely a nightmare for anyone who wants an aftermarket audio system since it's no longer a DIN design. The stopwatch on the dashboard is interesting but definitely not necessary, and is probably an idea jacked from Porsche, since something similar is available with a sport package on their 911 Turbo and includes a short overboost feature. While a lot of non-manual transmissions incorporate shift levers and shift boots that look like manual transmissions, this one is ridiculous. While a minor thing, that shift knob doesn't belong there. Once again, I'm not a big fan of the looks, but maybe it will grow on me. Also, the problem is that they've started with pretty much a new engine design with an aluminum block. Its potential for further power will have to be determined, and progress will take time and money since it's an all-new motor.
 
DeeezNuuuts83 said:
Honda Accord coupe looks like it has a Hyundai front end with BMW 3-Series lines running front front to rear with Scion tC tail lights. I'm not a big fan of the thick-spoke wheels.


seriously.



but nothing beats a good ol' fashioned VW/Audi.
 
PELLA said:
i like your Evo better. These ones look like shit i think. 2.0L producing 320hp, damn
Thanks, me too. Even though the X is definitely more futuristic, the IX has a cleaner design that flows better from front to rear. But the hp and torque estimates are insane, especially for a 2.0-liter. It should top out at mid-12s in the quarter-mile, but more importantly, I wonder what kind of lap times it will do in the Nurburgring.
 
damn the new cts and accord coupe are looking nice

i saw some pics of the new altima coupe. it looks pretty cool too. i'm not even a big fan of altimas but the coupe was cool
 
DeeezNuuuts83 said:
Thanks, me too. Even though the X is definitely more futuristic, the IX has a cleaner design that flows better from front to rear. But the hp and torque estimates are insane, especially for a 2.0-liter. It should top out at mid-12s in the quarter-mile, but more importantly, I wonder what kind of lap times it will do in the Nurburgring.




looks heavier so know whos, and doesnt yours have 400hp? or the top of the line Evo IX?
 
PELLA said:
looks heavier so know whos, and doesnt yours have 400hp? or the top of the line Evo IX?
All Evo IXs have the same hp and torque, regardless of model. Mine is rated at 286, although the real figure is between 300 and 305. You might be thinking of the Ralliart Evos available in the UK, sold in doses from 260 hp all the way to the full-strength 405 hp version. (Those hp figures apply to the Evo VIII models, the most powerful IX that they released was "only" 360 hp, but it has a lot more torque available down low. The problem with the 405 hp Evo VIII MR FQ-400 was that all of the power was up top, making speed far less accessible in the lower rpm ranges, so they figured they'd rather make something that is easier to drive on a daily basis while still providing similar performance. Peak torque in the VIII FQ-400 came in at 5500 rpm while peak torque in the IX FQ-360 came in at 3200 rpm and was already a higher figure than the other model.)
 
That Caddy is butt ugly, the Accord looks like the new Ford and the Evo is, er, different. The best looking Evo's was the second generation. 4 through 6. They looked most aggressive.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.