Film & TV Da Vinci Code Slammed

#1
Cannes critics slam The Da Vinci Code


Thursday May 18 08:00 AEST


"Most critics panned The Da Vinci Code on Wednesday ahead of the world premiere of the year's most eagerly awaited movie.

Kicking off the annual Cannes film festival, Ron Howard's adaptation of the Dan Brown bestseller was described variously as "grim", "unwieldy" and "plodding", though one reviewer bucked the trend and said "You'll Louvre It!"

The cool reception was temporarily forgotten at a glitzy opening ceremony, where screen legend Sidney Poitier and Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai joined Da Vinci Code star Tom Hanks and the normally publicity-shy Brown on the red carpet.


Even before its general release on May 18 and 19, The Da Vinci Code generated controversy as Christians around the world called for it to be banned.

The novel has enraged religious groups because one of its characters argues that Jesus Christ married Mary Magdalene and had a child by her, and that elements within the Catholic Church resorted to murder to hide the truth.

In Thailand on Wednesday, a police-run censorship board overturned an earlier decision to cut the last 10 minutes of the film, but insisted the distributor add disclaimers stating it was fiction.

In Ireland, volunteers plan to distribute free copies of a special edition of The Irish Catholic newspaper outside cinemas showing The Da Vinci Code over the weekend.

A Vatican cardinal has called for a boycott of the picture, and the Indian government said it would show the movie to Christian groups before clearing its release. In the mainly Catholic Philippines censors gave it an "adult only" rating.

Howard and Hanks defended the film at a news conference, saying it was a piece of fiction. British actor Alfred Molina, who plays a Machiavellian bishop in the movie, blamed the media for creating controversy where there was little or none.

At a screening late on Tuesday in Cannes, members of the audience laughed at the thriller's pivotal moment, and the end of the $US125 million ($A163.3 million) picture was greeted with stony silence.

Trade publication Variety had barely a nice word to say.
"A pulpy page-turner in its original incarnation as a huge international bestseller has become a stodgy, grim thing in the exceedingly literal-minded film version of The Da Vinci Code," wrote Todd McCarthy.

Lee Marshall of Screen International agreed.
"I haven't read the book, but I just thought there was a ridiculous amount of exposition," he said. "I thought it was plodding and there was a complete lack of chemistry between Audrey Tautou and Tom Hanks."

Lou Lumenick of the New York Post was far more upbeat:
"Ron Howard's splendid The Da Vinci Code is the Holy Grail of summer blockbusters: a crackling, fast-moving thriller that's every bit as brainy and irresistible as Dan Brown's controversial bestseller."

Critics say the controversy surrounding the film, and the fact more than 40 million people have bought the book, will ensure a strong box office performance, but they believe word-of-mouth is likely to hit sales later on.

The movie industry will be watching The Da Vinci Code particularly closely after the first two summer blockbusters - Mission: Impossible III and Poseidon - stumbled.

Howard had some advice for those who objected to the story.
"There's no question that the film is likely to be upsetting to some people. My advice is ... to not go and see the movie if you think you're going to be upset."

Ian McKellen, an openly gay actor who plays Leigh Teabing in The Da Vinci Code, tried to make light of the controversy.

"I'm very happy to believe that Jesus was married," he said.

"I know the Catholic Church has problems with gay people and I thought this would be absolute proof that Jesus was not gay."

The opening ceremony and Da Vinci Code premiere kick off 12 hectic days of screenings, interviews, photocalls and partying in Cannes, the world's biggest film festival.

©AAP 2006"

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=100770


I'm disappointed to hear that... I was hoping they would say it would be good and at least comparable in excitement to the book. Ah well, will just have to see it to make my own judgment. I wonder whether it would be better to watch if you havent read the book... at least that way your expectations wouldnt be high.
 
#2
Amara said:
Kicking off the annual Cannes film festival, Ron Howard's adaptation of the Dan Brown bestseller was described variously as "grim", "unwieldy" and "plodding", though one reviewer bucked the trend and said "You'll Louvre It!"
I would not trust the opinion of someone who made a pun that bad.

I haven't actually read the book, but from what I've heard about it (and the countless "Uncovering The Da Vinci Code", "The REAL Da Vinci Code", "The Da Vinci Code EXPOSED"-type shows) I don't think I'd like it. If my friends want to see the film, I'll go along. Otherwise, I'll stick to X-Men 3 :thumb:
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#3
i'm about 100 pages away from finishing the book. i cant wait to see it even if it has been getting bad reviews. the church probably payed those critics off.

the book is great so far. i doubt the movie will be as good as the book, but then again none ever are.

does anyone else think that the church calling for boycotts of the film just makes what the book is trying to say, as far as the conspiracies through out time, seem almost more believable? i mean its a fictional book. they shouldnt care at all.
 
#4
Illuminattile said:
I haven't actually read the book, but from what I've heard about it (and the countless "Uncovering The Da Vinci Code", "The REAL Da Vinci Code", "The Da Vinci Code EXPOSED"-type shows) I don't think I'd like it. If my friends want to see the film, I'll go along. Otherwise, I'll stick to X-Men 3 :thumb:
I think despite the spin off effects the book has had in producing all this historical and religious controversy, the reason why people liked the book is that it was well written. I dont think the reason why millions of people couldnt put it down was because they gave a damn about jesus or the church being exposed.... (sure that might be part of it), but ultimately it was the way it was written that made it good. Afterall, no-one paid much attention to Holy Blood, Holy Grail and all the other books with potentially controversial affects on religion.

PuffnScruff said:
the book is great so far. i doubt the movie will be as good as the book, but then again none ever are.
Yeah no matter how good a movie might be made, it would be so difficult to live up the hype of a popular book... in fact it's probably impossible to ever exceed it. I guess because with a book people can interpret it their own way whereas with a movie its essentially just how one or at most a hand full of people understand it. And then they are limited by money and the skill of the people they employ.

does anyone else think that the church calling for boycotts of the film just makes what the book is trying to say, as far as the conspiracies through out time, seem almost more believable? i mean its a fictional book. they shouldnt care at all.
In a sense yeah, if it didnt strike a nerve, it wouldnt have received the response it did. Then again, perhaps conscious of the fact that people's minds are very malleable and particularly susceptible to media - whether books, tv, movies etc, the Church feels obliged to stand strong to the fact that it is fiction (and for all we know it is, and if you know something to be the absolute truth, then of course you're gonna make a big deal out of it until everyone knows you are right). Plus of course, there are no doubt beneficial interests for the Church in having people discuss religion - it puts it in their minds, its publicity for an institution which has lost a lot of significance in society.
 

_carmi

me, myself & us
#10
im going to watch it next week. the book was freaking good. and i believe the movie can't be THAT bad. and its been like for about one month or so that i wanna see it. no critics will make me change my mind.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#11
Despite my interest for history, i have no affinity at all with the book or movie. I don't know whether it's because I'm just not interested or because everyone is dribbling with excitement before I've even finished saying "Da Vinci Code".

But mleh, going to stay far away from this one :)
 
#12
I got dragged along to see it tonight. I agree about the masses of exposition, it really did drag the film down. I imagine the book worked better. I wouldn't say it was a good film, but it wasn't unbearable.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#15
so i downloaded the movie and with in the first 20 minutes i was amazed at how many parts in the movie dont follow the book exactly, but i guess that does happen a lot in movies that were originally books.
 

hizzle?

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#19
This is stupid, this movie is fucking great... i have no fucking idea why they slammed it, its great... the actors/the choices of actors are/is great (Jean Reno is the man), the music fits nice with the scenes, the story (obviously) is great, etc. etc....
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#20
wow...all i can say is if you read the book you might be disappointed with the movie. i kept finding myself asking "what the fuck".

i mean i didnt even see the mickey mouse watch once.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top