You may have meant to say that but, as you can, in no way did you say that.
your clutching at straws here. The 2nd quote
this has got nothing to do with culture or religion
was in reference to you saying "what if I went and vandalised a spiritual centre and or a religous centre". I said that the vandalism of lewd billboards is nothing to do with culture or religion. I.E it is not the defacing of religious or cultural paraphenalia
Yeah, I agree with this but, I did have, & still do, have a problem with your view of British culture which isn't solely to do with my personal opinion of British culture but due to the fact that I know what is acceptable in my country because I live here & I am part of this culture & society whereas you are not & so cannot be expected to know this stuff better than me or any other British resident.
I also Live in UK, your point?
Oh morales over law definetely but the question here is whose morales? While you say that this is a violation of many's morales I dispute that & would say it violates the moral codes of the few & that a sizeable nimber of these 'few' would object due to the influence of foreign culture which, although it is healthy to have widespread influences, cannot override national culture.
The ASA rules state that cause of offence is reason to disapprove a billboard. I dont think that lewd billboards could come under culture of the nation. Violation of the moral codes of a few is enough for a british regulator to abandon the advert as the rules of the regualtor state.
Living in a democray the will of the minority has also to be looked after.