What if I backdate my phone to the stock rom it came with and lose root? Could that solve the problem? Then would I reflash the htc rom and then cm rom? Or is it a much more complicated procedure if I lose root?
You might've thought that one of the local players would've been the first to announce Android gear for South Korea, but that honor ended up going to Motorola with its MOTOROI -- so who's next up to bat? That'd be Samsung, which has unveiled its biggest, baddest Android device to date in the SHW-M100S which features a 3.7-inch WVGA AMOLED display (same as the Nexus One), 5 megapixel cam, 802.11n (yes, n!) WiFi, Android 2.1, and -- of course -- a T-DMB mobile TV tuner. It's launching next month on SKT, meaning Seoul could end up being one of the world's most interesting Google-powered battlegrounds in 2010.
Eternal archrivals-to-the-death Samsung and LG have a tendency to match one another tit for tat in virtually every consumer electronic category, but for whatever reason, LG's been far less interested in going for broke with Android over the past year -- though a preoccupation with Windows Phone 7 Series is a solid guess at this point. Things may be changing, though, now that we've got news out of Telecoms Korea that they're prepping a more brutal assault than the weakling GW620 could ever provide in the form of a so-called LU2300 for the domestic market (we're assuming the actual thing will be a little more... well, "designed" than the snow-white mockup above). The site is playing up LG's announcement that the phone will bundle a bunch of popular apps in ROM (awesome?) but the real news is the impressive spec sheet, which is said to include a Nexus One-like 1GHz Snapdragon and WVGA AMOLED display paired with Android 2.1 and a 5 megapixel cam capable of 720p video. It certainly sounds like it's ready to give Samsung's M100S a run for its money, but we'll need to wait until its second quarter release to know for sure.
CUPERTINO, Calif. March 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Apple® today filed a lawsuit against HTC for infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface, underlying architecture and hardware. The lawsuit was filed concurrently with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and in U.S. District Court in Delaware.
We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO. “We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.”
Apple reinvented the mobile phone in 2007 with its revolutionary iPhone®, and did it again in 2008 with its pioneering App Store, which now offers more than 150,000 mobile applications in over 90 countries. Over 40 million iPhones have been sold worldwide.
What Apple vs. HTC Could Mean
By NICK BILTON
Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images
The Google Nexus One smartphone and Apple’s iPhone.The lawsuit that Apple filed on Tuesday against HTC, the mobile handset maker, opens up a lot of questions about the future of Android phones like the Nexus One and the cellphone market in general.
But it could also have an effect on consumers, specifically those who have purchased HTC Android phones.
Jonathan Zittrain, a professor at Harvard Law School, outlines a similar case in his book “The Future of the Internet — and How to Stop It.” In 2004, TiVo sued the satellite TV distributor EchoStar, accusing the company of infringing on its patent on DVR technology. After some drawn-out litigation, TiVo ended up winning the case, and a Texas judge ordered EchoStar to disable the DVR functions on most of its set-top boxes. An appeals court is reviewing the matter.
“The judge simply ordered EchoStar to connect to the DVR boxes via the Web and destroy the functionality,” Mr. Zittrain told me in an interview. “Patent law is a completely different universe online. That means if the court were to side with Apple and issue an injunction that insists HTC kill the phone, or at least some of its functionality, they easily could.”
A ruling that would call on HTC to kill the whole phone does seem highly unlikely, especially given the prominence of the companies involved.
Stephen Lieb, an intellectual property lawyer at Frommer Lawrence & Haug, said courts had recently moved away from these kinds of injunctions. Now, he said, they take into account the effect of banning a service or product on the marketplace, and on the public interest.
“Courts are going to be very careful about crafting an injunction here,” Mr. Lieb said, “but before we even see this happen, it’s pretty likely that HTC, or even Google, will file a countersuit.”
Apple has a bigger strategy at work here. It filed its suit with the United States District Court in Delaware, but also with the United States International Trade Commission, and it could ask the commission to halt shipments of infringing HTC phones that are coming into the United States.
So why did Apple sue HTC and not Google? Mr. Zittrain believes Apple is simply going after a less powerful company first, one with much smaller pockets than Google.
“It clearly involves some form of litigation strategy of picking off the weaker members of the herd first,” Mr Zittrain said. “They can always add Google to the suit later on.”
Many lawyers I spoke with believe this case will end up being settled out of court before it goes that far.
David H. Levitt, a partner in the Chicago law office of Hinshaw & Culbertso, points to an earlier case in which Research in Motion, makers of the BlackBerry, were sued by a patent owner and lost the case. Mr. Levitt said questions arose about whether “BlackBerry owners were going to have their phones shut down as a result of R.I.M.’s patent infringement.” In the end R.I.M. settled.
“These cases can last many years, sometimes 5 or 10, and can be extremely costly,” Mr. Levitt said. “It’s much more cost effective to settle.”
Eric Von Hippel, a professor of technological innovation at M.I.T.’s Sloan School of Management, noted that “only 5 percent of these types of cases actually go through the judicial system.” Even for a company like Apple, he said, they are just too expensive.
Mr. Von Hippel also said that these lawsuits pointed to a bigger problem with the patent system. “It’s a bad scene right now. The social value of patents was supposed to be to encourage innovation — that’s what society gets out of it,” he said. “The net effect is that they decrease innovation, and in the end, the public loses out.”
yeah I know, it's hard to really compare these two. However here I could buy like 3 Spicas for one Nexus One if it comes to price lol.
Quite frankly, Steve Jobs is delusional and this is yet MORE evidence (as if there wasn't enough) that Apple are literally shitting themselves more and more everyday over Android taking their market share.
Except Apple is even MORE fucked this time, because not only do they themselves rely on core Google services like Google Maps and YouTube on their devices (and these legal issues could very well force them into having to use inferior services such as Bing Maps etc), but, unlike any other OS, Android is free for any hardware manufacturer to use, which obviously increases adoption, but also allows hardware partners to have a bigger profit margin.
There's simply no way Apple can win this war, not even with their (rapidly INCREASING) current market share.
Lol Apple are far from "shitting themselves"
Consider this...they are one company making ONE phone thats still shitting on wannabe iPhones running a half assed OS ripoff.
Google Pays Apple $100 million for Search on iPhone.
Actually Google pays Apple a lot of money to have Google as the default search engine in Safari on OSX and Google services (maps Safari, youtube) on the iPhone.
Your hate for Apple is pathetic lol.
You have no clue. If Apple were not running scared they would not have:
1. Denied Google Voice from the App Store and then lied to the FCC about the reasons why.
2. Jobs would not have gone on a big angry rant about Google at their recent employee conference
3. They would not be filing stupid hypocritical lawsuits against HTC that they will never win.
4. They would not be considering teaming up with Microsoft to use Bing.
LOL, once again you have NO clue. I suggest that you do the following:
1. Research how much money Google make from each user of their services.
2. Multiply it by the amount of iPhone/Mac users on the planet.
3. Realize that that amount is a LOT more than $100 million dollars, lol
Not as pathetic as your blind fanboyism. Now get the fuck out of my thread and go participate in the Apple one....oh wait nobody posts in there cos nobody cares.