Well if people still fought with sticks, I'd agree.
In the age of carpet bombing and bunker busters, not so much.
In the age of carpet bombing and bunker busters, not so much.
Even comparing their navy and air units with oh so great American they are not any worse in quantity (usually exceeding American) or much in quality (with their 4th generation air units fe.)
It's also worth mentioning their top-notch cyberwarfare units, space warfare systems or missile systems with about 160 icbm silos (with nukes too) and 150 irbms all around China.
Also, we know that they possess great amounts of chemical weapons and we don't really know the type or amount since they do not belong to the Australia Group (monitoring development and export of chemical weapons).
Since 1st October 2009 we also know that they have some damn cool cruise missiles with stellar navigation systems.
The worst thing is we have no idea what they in fact have except of what has been confirmed.
oh and "According to the Pentagon, China is currently developing kinetic-energy weapons, high-powered lasers, high-powered microwave weapons, particle-beam weapons, and electromagnetic pulse weapons with its increase of military fundings"
So in fact they are not "fighting with sticks".
Indian military is also sooo underrated with the second biggest army (after China), shitloads of great aircrafts including new Su-30 and strategic nuclear bombers (3 thousand military aircrafts in total), again nuclear intercontinental missiles, great anti-missile program, and 5th world's largest navy (which is a lot considering that they don't have to worry that much about naval warfare).
China and India combined would probably shit on world's military power, let alone America.
However it would be stupid for China to do anything with it at the moment or in the nearest future. They are still too poor.
It they nuked the shit out of the US - so what then? They could say bye bye to their money and have half of the world against them.