Duke said:
You only like the bits of science that don't go against your precious creation theory.
So do you, you like the bits and pieces of science that don't go against your precious evolution theory.
You are a farce, sir. You have no clue about science, it's foundation and it's principles, and most of all, you have no clue how one conducts science.
Useless
It seems to me you think science is being done by bearded professors sitting in a lab coming up with outrageous theories.
Useless
Nay, i say. The big difference with religion and faith is that science can be wrong, and will accept the fact that they may be wrong on subject X or Y. And even then, even if the theory doesn't hold up, there is years of research and hard work put into that, it's not a vague theory stemming from a 1500 year old book.
Yes i agree, Sure my theory is vague atleast i admit that unlike you hardcore sci-fi nuts who will accept any garbage put into neat scientific words and call it fact no matter how much it lacks evidence and how much evidence there is against it
You keep calling evolutionist theories fairy tales. People have been putting in effort to obtain that knowledge for decades, yet you come in with your arrogant mug and dismiss it as fairy tales, when you yourself believe in some huge bearded ape who created us like we're an airfix kit.
Because my theories are always labeled fairy tales, including by you when in fact your theories are just as fairy talish and wishful thinking as mine.
Hilarity. Most of all, however, I got to have a few chuckles at you posting those lanky entropy and Hoyle theories. It just goes to show to which lows you will stoop.
What is your point for posting Hoyle's theories? The scientific world doesn't accept his work without question, his theories are vague and redundant. He doesn't even believe in God.
What is the point in anything you've posted? the scientific world doesn't accept any of it, Your theories are vague redundant and have long since been disregarded as possibilities. They're done by Anti-religious extremists and racists, stemming from Darwin himself
There was no point for posting Hoyle's story. Neither as there was a point for posting your entropy-cancels-evolution bullshit. You merely hoped to "foil science with science", to look cool and smart and interesting. You failed. It made you look desperate and ignorant.
There was no point in anything you've posted including that article of yours, i've debunked it with a single sentense. and i did look cool and smart when i did that. You and jokerman have not posted anything besides that article of yours that contained nothing but a bunch of speculations, maybies, and stories. Where is the fucking science you keep talking about?
When we post something scientific
You've posted nothing scientific!. For fuck sakes
The difference is that your article tends to be "unaccepted" and devoid of any support. Bluntly put, it's wrong, while we dig up stuff that has a broad foundation within the scientific community and tends to be well researched.
Yes i agree with you everything i've posted has no broad foundation within the scientific community, thats because they came from evolutionists and anti-creationists, as well as everything you've dug up from evolutionists, or is it just the stuff i've come up with? Ha you make me laugh!
Earth was round instead of flat? Our bad, corrected. Ridiculously huge amount of stars instead of 2? Right, duly noted. DNA, amino acids? Ok, got that.
Yup truly amazing isn't it? We used the tool of science to know and understand Gods artistry and design, not how every damn thing fell into place by mere chance, coincidence and fucking mistakes. OK, got that?
Hell, maybe sciene turns out to be wrong and 40 years from now they'll find evidence of "teh Cr3at0r". It will be acknowledged.
God i hope that happens before they find evidence of your All Mighty Creator "ChAnCe".
While you religionists keep clinging to your ancient dogma's, rusted ideas and dusty tomes for eternity. There is no change in religion. Science is like a mountain stream. Vivid, changing, on point. Religion is a stale marsh.
No need to change something that has no reason change, and infact will never have a need to change!
And it will be a matter of time until the last vestiges of belief and it's last strongholds,
Time is something your belief doesn't have.
things that science has been unable to disprove so far are gone.
Lol Like what?
Science is gaining ground. For the past 500 years, the Catholic church in particular, had to give in to science countless times.
Do i care? I'm not catholic
And that is what will happen. A 100 or 200 years from now we will know and understand how life started on Earth. And we will know all the intracacies and details of evolution, enough to stop you pesky creationists from bothering us with your half-science articles you merely quoted when you thought there was something to gain.
Funny you mention that, cause thats what Darwin exactly wished and hoped for to happen centuries after his death, 150 years later his and your beliefs have went nowhere but downhill ever since, as expected from such fantasies. Fantasies desquised as sceince cant hide from REAL science. The truth will always be told.
And stop wishing for somethings that can never happen. "Details of evolution" "how life started" "End of Religion". Seems like you're out on a mention to prove your religion right and mine wrong. haha
In any case, i'm wrapping this up for the final time. This discussion has been very very annoying thanks to Teck, and you have the dubious honour of being the first person to go on my Ignore list. Such is the impact of your non-reasoning vileness.
WoW that brought up many memories of when i debated christianity with this christian, he got extremely offended and defensive that he ignored me. Im sorry If i've ever offended your religious beliefs, i do respect them all the same!.
I've never read such a useless and worthless post in my entire TB life, Stay on topic or else run your fingers randomly somewhere else. for now go spontaneously generate a watch for me will yah?