Democrats Triumph In Midterm Elections

#1
SOURCE, CNN

(CNN) -- Democrats will take control of the House of Representatives for the first time since the 1994 Republican revolution, while control of the Senate hangs in the balance, CNN projects.

Democratic challengers have picked up four seats in the Senate, CNN projects. Republicans would need to take just one of the two remaining competitive races to keep control of the chamber. Results are still too close to call in Montana and Virginia.

In Montana, Republican Sen. Conrad Burns was running behind his Democratic challenger, state Sen. John Tester.

If Tester wins, Democrats could secure Senate control by winning in Virginia, where embattled Republican Sen. George Allen trailed his Democratic challenger, Jim Webb, by fewer than 6,000 votes out of more than 2.3 million counted. (Full Senate news)

Under Virginia law, the apparent loser can request a recount after the votes have been certified if the margin is less than 1 percent of the total votes cast. If that happens, the result may not be clear for weeks.

Webb declared victory early Wednesday, saying, "The votes are in, and we won."

But Allen wasn't backing down. "The election continues," he said.

If the parties split the Virginia and Montana races, that would create a 50-50 breakdown in the Senate, assuming that the two independent members will caucus with the Democrats. In that event, Vice President Dick Cheney's constitutional authority to break tie votes would keep the Senate under Republican leadership.
Pelosi heralds 'new direction'

Democrats picked up at least 28 seats, more than the 15 they needed to capture a majority in the House. (Latest House news)

"Tonight is a great victory for the American people," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, who is poised to become the first female speaker of the House. "The American people voted for a new direction."

She vowed "civility and bipartisanship" but confronted the president over his Iraq policy: "Mr. President, we need a new direction in Iraq." (Watch Pelosi challenge the president -- 4:43 Video)

The projected result means that President Bush for the first time faces the prospect of working with a Democratic-controlled House.

Bush, whose anemic approval ratings proved a drag on Republican prospects, was described as "disappointed" with the House results. However, spokesman Tony Fratto said the president was "still optimistic about the Senate."

White House spokesman Tony Snow said the president would telephone Pelosi on Wednesday to offer congratulations.

"We're going to get a lot done," Snow said. "On energy, education, those are clearly things we can work on."

The parties of presidents serving their sixth year in office historically have suffered substantial losses in midterm elections, with the recent exception of President Clinton in 1998.

This year's turnover in Congress is the largest since 1994.

The Democratic pickups in the House included three seats vacated by Republicans amid controversy: Mark Foley's in Florida, Bob Ney's in Ohio and Tom DeLay's in Texas. Two incumbent Pennsylvania Republicans embroiled in controversy also lost their seats -- 10-term Rep. Curt Weldon and Rep. Don Sherwood.
'Steep mountain to climb'

Thirty-three Senate seats were at stake, but only nine races had been considered competitive.

Republican Sen. Jim Talent of Missouri early Wednesday conceded defeat to Democrat Claire McCaskill after a hard-fought race, telling supporters that "the headwind was just very, very strong this year."

McCaskill was backed by actor and stem-cell-research advocate Michael J. Fox.

Republican candidate Bob Corker will win the Tennessee Senate race, defeating Democratic Rep. Harold Ford Jr., CNN projects. He'll fill the open seat now held by retiring Republican Bill Frist, the Senate majority leader.

Democratic senator-turned-independent candidate Joe Lieberman will win the Connecticut Senate race, CNN projects. Both he and newly elected independent Bernie Sanders in Vermont have said they will caucus with the Democrats. (Watch Joe Lieberman become a "comeback kid" -- 1:58 Video)

Democratic challenger Sheldon Whitehouse will win the Rhode Island Senate race, defeating Republican incumbent Lincoln Chafee, CNN projects.

Two-term Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, the chamber's third-ranking Republican, has conceded to Bob Casey Jr. And Democrat Sherrod Brown will defeat GOP Sen. Mike DeWine in Ohio, CNN projects.

"This just was a little too steep of a mountain to climb," said Santorum, an outspoken opponent of abortion and same-sex marriage.

And DeWine, also a two-term senator, told supporters: "It just was not to be. This was not the year."

Democrats retained two of their Senate seats that were considered competitive, in New Jersey and Maryland, CNN projects.

Defying the traditional political maxim that "all politics is local," 62 percent of voters said in exit polls that national issues mattered more than local issues.

The exit polls showed that 42 percent of voters called corruption an extremely important issue in their choices at the polls, followed by terrorism at 40 percent, the economy at 39 percent and the war in Iraq at 37 percent.
Other developments:

# With more voters than ever using electronic voting machines, scattered glitches reported across the country prompted officials to extend voting hours in some areas. (Full story)

# Six governorships changed from Republican to Democratic hands Tuesday, giving Democrats control of a majority of the top state posts for the first time in 12 years. (Governors races)

# Also appearing on state ballots were dozens of referendums, some dealing with controversial issues such as same-sex marriage and abortion. (Ballot initiatives)
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#3
dont you mean hope bush gets caught lying under oath?

the funny thing about the elections from the dems side is that their whole thing was "we're not them" "we are not for the war", which is fine, you dont like the war ok....but what do you guys plan on changing about it? they have no plan and they wont change anything in regards to the war

i think the next 2 years will be very entertaining. now people can finally see how big of wetodds many of these democrats are. not to mention how more democrat scandals will come over the next two years and people can finally see on more of a national level what i have always been saying. when it comes to scandals democrats cover them up. when there is a problem call uncle george sorros for money and help in swaying public opinion.
 
#4
PuffnScruff said:
when it comes to scandals democrats cover them up.
ummm, doesn't every politician and political party, Republican, Democrat, whatever, do that? have you been paying attention to all the scandals over the past years, when the Republicans had the power? or did you just block all that out? calling out the Dems for something every political party has done doesn't make much sense, especially since this administration and congress and the senate has been littered with scandals of all kinds in the past couple of years that were (poorly) covered up.
 
#5
PuffnScruff said:
dont you mean hope bush gets caught lying under oath?

the funny thing about the elections from the dems side is that their whole thing was "we're not them" "we are not for the war", which is fine, you dont like the war ok....but what do you guys plan on changing about it? they have no plan and they wont change anything in regards to the war

i think the next 2 years will be very entertaining. now people can finally see how big of wetodds many of these democrats are. not to mention how more democrat scandals will come over the next two years and people can finally see on more of a national level what i have always been saying. when it comes to scandals democrats cover them up. when there is a problem call uncle george sorros for money and help in swaying public opinion.
All what you said is nothing but republican propaganda. If you have anything open minded to say, then I would consider your perspective and find ways to either agree or refute your statements however it is evident to me that you are just another unfortunate byproduct of our incompetent president who is in denial of the future of our country. Me and many many Americans who live abroad that I know of are happy and pleased the democrats took control... now for the next week few weeks you might have some hope and linger to the possibility that you might retain control of the senate but it's doubtful...

The people have voted, if you don't like reality.. I suggest you join our president and also live in a state of denial.

And the recent waves of scandals came from your side sir, so get your story straight...
 

Elmira

Well-Known Member
#6
PuffnScruff, do you know what an objective opinion is?

Most everything I read from you seems more an attempt to discredit the entire Democratic party rather than show your dissatisfaction with any one of the actions of its members or the platform on which they stand. From there it's just a moot point, one not worth discussing, as there's clearly an ulterior motive behind the argument. Seems any rebuttal I make will go for naught when you have your mind made up about an entire political party.

PuffnScruff said:
dont you mean hope bush gets caught lying under oath?
You want to talk about lies as it applies to his presidency? We don't need him to get "caught" saying anything. We have proof of enough intention to deceive by the administrations lies and coverups in the Iraq war. Colin Powell's UN debacle, "Intelligence failure," WMD, "Yellow Cake"...I could go on.



Furthermore, what is all this headline talk of "What now?" For the first time in 12 years Democrats win back the House and a majority of governships and all anyone expects is some sort of radical action (impeachment proceedings, push for an immediate withdrawal of troops, bringing about a major "change" in the war, etc). Such decisive action would only jeopardize their standings. More practical issues will be dealt with (repeal of Bush's tax cuts for upper-class citizens, plans to raise minimum wage, a reduction of rates on student loans, attempts at bipartisan work on a new Iraq strategy, expansion of No Child Left behind program, social security, guest-worker programs for illegal immigrants, health care, etc).


when it comes to scandals democrats cover them up. when there is a problem call uncle george sorros for money and help in swaying public opinion.
That's funny you say that. The current collapse in GOP support is directly related to scandal. See: Mark Foley affair, Randy Cunningham's resignation, Tom Delay's money-laundering, and the federal investigation on Robert Ney.
 
#7
Furthermore, what is all this headline talk of "What now?" For the first time in 12 years Democrats win back the House and a majority of governships and all anyone expects is some sort of radical action (impeachment proceedings, push for an immediate withdrawal of troops, bringing about a major "change" in the war, etc). Such decisive action would only jeopardize their standings. More practical issues will be dealt with (repeal of Bush's tax cuts for upper-class citizens, plans to raise minimum wage, a reduction of rates on student loans, attempts at bipartisan work on a new Iraq strategy, expansion of No Child Left behind program, social security, guest-worker programs for illegal immigrants, health care, etc).
You gotta be kidding me. Expansion of the NCLB program? lol That was the worst bill anyone could ever sign.
 
#8
That is such great news, i stayed up til like 3 in the morning watching the election results....

Yeah the senate race is unbelievably close, even if Webb wins in Virginia, Allen and the Republicans are gonna ask and pay for a recount just ot make sure so if the democrats do win that seat after the montana race, they won't be for sure in charge until like 20 days after the fact.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#9
Devious187 said:
ummm, doesn't every politician and political party, Republican, Democrat, whatever, do that? have you been paying attention to all the scandals over the past years, when the Republicans had the power? or did you just block all that out? calling out the Dems for something every political party has done doesn't make much sense, especially since this administration and congress and the senate has been littered with scandals of all kinds in the past couple of years that were (poorly) covered up.
yes every political party has scandals, but at what degree do they cover them up? look at the past few years. everytime a scandal has surfaced that involved a person who is a republican they cleaned up. they got rid of the people. delay, cunningham,foley and there are others. then look at the democrats that have been exposed in being involved in scandals and the party does nothing. look at harry reid. he has been exposed as being part of the abramoff scandal along with other democrats. all they do is deny having anything to do with and try to brush it under the rug and say "no no no, its all a republican scandal" not to mention reid has been exposed in some other scandals and he is still in office. he is one of the most crooked politicians in office and nobody seems to care because he is a democrat.


tru- you obviously do not pay that close attention to politics because many democrat scandals get burried in the news quickly and not all of the scandals in the past few years have been all about republicans. perhaps you are only seeing what you want to see. there have been many from the democrats in the past few years. you are the one who should get the story straight. considering you seem to get all your information from cnn, it doesnt surprise me at all you wouldnt know of any democrat scandals


Elmira said:
PuffnScruff, do you know what an objective opinion is?

Most everything I read from you seems more an attempt to discredit the entire Democratic party rather than show your dissatisfaction with any one of the actions of its members or the platform on which they stand. From there it's just a moot point, one not worth discussing, as there's clearly an ulterior motive behind the argument. Seems any rebuttal I make will go for naught when you have your mind made up about an entire political party.



You want to talk about lies as it applies to his presidency? We don't need him to get "caught" saying anything. We have proof of enough intention to deceive by the administrations lies and coverups in the Iraq war. Colin Powell's UN debacle, "Intelligence failure," WMD, "Yellow Cake"...I could go on.



Furthermore, what is all this headline talk of "What now?" For the first time in 12 years Democrats win back the House and a majority of governships and all anyone expects is some sort of radical action (impeachment proceedings, push for an immediate withdrawal of troops, bringing about a major "change" in the war, etc). Such decisive action would only jeopardize their standings. More practical issues will be dealt with (repeal of Bush's tax cuts for upper-class citizens, plans to raise minimum wage, a reduction of rates on student loans, attempts at bipartisan work on a new Iraq strategy, expansion of No Child Left behind program, social security, guest-worker programs for illegal immigrants, health care, etc).




That's funny you say that. The current collapse in GOP support is directly related to scandal. See: Mark Foley affair, Randy Cunningham's resignation, Tom Delay's money-laundering, and the federal investigation on Robert Ney.
i have never hid my hate for the current democratic party. it is not the same democratic party that it used to be, it is run by ultra left wing liberals. its as clear as day. i dont like any party that is run by anyone that is far anything.

and you completely missed my point about republicans cleaning up and democrats covering up. all those people you mentioned resigned when their party asked them too. hense the party cleaning up. has reid resigned? no. has any other democrats involved in the abramoff scandal resigned?
 

Snowman

Well-Known Member
#10
Get Ready for a an extra $2000 dollars we'll be paying in taxes. thanks a lot you democrats :fury:

whats nice about GW he was giving a little extra on our tax returns. kiss that goodbye :eek:
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#11
Snowman said:
Get Ready for a an extra $2000 dollars we'll be paying in taxes. thanks a lot you democrats :fury:

whats nice about GW he was giving a little extra on our tax returns. kiss that goodbye :eek:
exactly, not to mention anyone with a child saw more money, people were seeing more money on their ira's and 401k's, the stock market was record numbers, economy was great, unemployment was at all time record lows, new jobs were being created every year in the millions, and small businesses were getting great help from those tax cuts. if the dems do actually get their way and reverse bush's tax cuts people are going to see less money all around and inflation is going to get even higher. but i dont think they will get the tax cuts done away with unless a democrat takes office in 08
 

Jokerman

Well-Known Member
#12
The reasons the GOP lost the house (and will likely lose the Senate) are because they pissed off their own base.

Campaign Finance Reform
Medicare Reform
No Child Left Behind
Failure to Secure the border
Failure to remove illegal aliens from our country
No plan in Iraq other than "stay the course"

This election was a referendum on President Bush, and Americans said "no confidence" loud and clear.

Any other explanation is self-delusion.

Now we can all watch Democrats make bigger fools of themselves.
 
#13
Snowman said:
Get Ready for a an extra $2000 dollars we'll be paying in taxes. thanks a lot you democrats :fury:

whats nice about GW he was giving a little extra on our tax returns. kiss that goodbye :eek:
LOL this is funny, the only people reaping true benefits from getting a tax break were the richest people in america. YOu people are too much i swear man.
 
#14
PuffnScruff said:
exactly, not to mention anyone with a child saw more money, people were seeing more money on their ira's and 401k's, the stock market was record numbers, economy was great, unemployment was at all time record lows, new jobs were being created every year in the millions, and small businesses were getting great help from those tax cuts. if the dems do actually get their way and reverse bush's tax cuts people are going to see less money all around and inflation is going to get even higher. but i dont think they will get the tax cuts done away with unless a democrat takes office in 08
what the hell r u talking about? Bush stands to be the only president since the depression to leave with a net job loss. Far cry from your job creation statistic.
 

Snowman

Well-Known Member
#15
CoolWaterz said:
LOL this is funny, the only people reaping true benefits from getting a tax break were the richest people in america. YOu people are too much i swear man.
what are you talkin about? Bush made it happen i received extra money in my tax return. so did my father an we arent no millionaires.

when Clinton was in office we didnt get shit. thats a Democrat for you. Bush gave us our extra money cause he got the republicans Ok in the senate.

Your dumb ass Democrats didnt even want to give any tax breaks. the two idiots behind that are Hilary an Ted Kennedy. two people who dont belong in the Senate. (god i pray that the rest of america doesnt vote Hilary as president in 08. if that happens America will go down the toilet.

an Puff is right on what he said :thumb:

Watch Fox News, there fair and balanced. not one sided like CNN, CBS,ABC,NBC.
 
#16
Snowman said:
what are you talkin about? Bush made it happen i received extra money in my tax return. so did my father an we arent no millionaires.

when Clinton was in office we didnt get shit. thats a Democrat for you. Bush gave us our extra money cause he got the republicans Ok in the senate.

Your dumb ass Democrats didnt even want to give any tax breaks. the two idiots behind that are Hilary an Ted Kennedy. two people who dont belong in the Senate. (god i pray that the rest of america doesnt vote Hilary as president in 08. if that happens America will go down the toilet.

an Puff is right on what he said :thumb:

Watch Fox News, there fair and balanced. not one sided like CNN, CBS,ABC,NBC.
please, just stop youre making me laugh you really are. this country has gone so far down the toilet it would take more than one different president to fix it. Please stop with the fox news reference, its showing you out to be a joke.
 
#17
#1 - Do these results finally mean people on this forum will shutup about the voting machine conspiracies?

#2 - Democrats are not in favor of raising taxes. They're in favor of eliminating Bush's tax cuts on certain upper class income brackets. That's a big difference.
 

Snowman

Well-Known Member
#18
CoolWaterz said:
please, just stop youre making me laugh you really are. this country has gone so far down the toilet it would take more than one different president to fix it. Please stop with the fox news reference, its showing you out to be a joke.

Fox News is accurate. try watching it sometime. check out C-Span too.

people in the US are upset with Bush because of the war. they want the Democrats in hoping they can pull the troops out, an that they have a Dem president in 08 to back them up.

The Troops are gonna be over there for years and years to come. bringing them home would be a HUGE mistake


Im sorry you didnt get a tax break Cool Waterz. a person must have been eligible for it if they made a certain amount
 
#19
PuffnScruff said:
look at the past few years. everytime a scandal has surfaced that involved a person who is a republican they cleaned up. they got rid of the people. delay, cunningham,foley and there are others.
You're kidding me right? The Republican party found out about Mark Foleys advances toward underage paiges 2 years ago, and they just turned the other cheek, they only brought it out because fellow republicans found out and demanded it be brought out... The party tried to play a false image of success in Iraq the past few years, and discrediting all generals serving in Iraq askin for a change of course... Republican party is just as much if not more at fault then the Democrats.. They would've tried changing this before if we didn't have a rubber stamp congress the past few years...


i won't try and hide my hate for the republican party and their incompetent leader George Bush.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#20
Mo_Murda said:
You're kidding me right? The Republican party found out about Mark Foleys advances toward underage paiges 2 years ago, and they just turned the other cheek, they only brought it out because fellow republicans found out and demanded it be brought out... The party tried to play a false image of success in Iraq the past few years, and discrediting all generals serving in Iraq askin for a change of course... Republican party is just as much if not more at fault then the Democrats.. They would've tried changing this before if we didn't have a rubber stamp congress the past few years...


i won't try and hide my hate for the republican party and their incompetent leader George Bush.
like i said, when a scandal surfaces(gets into public light) they(the party) clean up. from everything i have read the scandal didnt make it to the public light until a year ago. democrats also knew of this too but decided to hold on to the info intil october. one or two people who know of what was going on before it gets to the public does not make up the entire party. and it has been proven that they were not so underage. they were legal adults at the time.

as far as them trying to paint a false picture of iraq,i believe it was jalal talabani who recently came over to the states and was shocked at our media. he compared cnn to al jazzera(sp). he said our media puts out such a negative image and spin on what goes on over there that he thought things had gotten worse in the past 24 hours since he left his country. he said the u.s. media does not tell the whole truth about what goes on in iraq and what they say is going on over there and how bad it is, is not what he sees everyday.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top