Cali Pigs Kill 13 Yr Old

good police officers are trained to protect the community, not safely remove some idiot from his car becuz hes drunk, would u rather a few people die instead.
 

ArtsyGirl

Well-Known Member
Silleone said:
good police officers are trained to protect the community, not safely remove some idiot from his car becuz hes drunk, would u rather a few people die instead.
Your assuming people would have died if they didnt shoot him. Theres no proof of that.
 

ArtsyGirl

Well-Known Member
What makes you think anyone would have definately been killed and there for a good enuff reason to kill? I'm not saying this kid wasnt dangerous, but there are plenty of dangerous people out there who get in similar situations but are breathing afterwards.. I'm sayin maybe they didnt do all they could have and were a little trigger happy too quickly.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Glockmatic said:
theres no proof he wouldn't have killed anyone. If a kid won't stop for cops what makes you think he'll stop for anyone else?

hahaha, don't you realize how stupid you sound?

"there's no proof he wouldn't have killed anyone"

One could say the same thing about me, my dad, our cat or my 89yr old neighbour.

Should we shoot 'em all?

Of course there's no proof of that!!!! How you gonna proof he wouldn't have killed somebody?

And because he didn't "stop" for the cops that's not enough to assume he was about to go on a killing spree, right?


good police officers are trained to protect the community, not safely remove some idiot from his car becuz hes drunk, would u rather a few people die instead.
So, to protect people from dying, we'll kill the suspect on the spot.


Wait...there's something wrong with that....:confused:
 

Glockmatic

Well-Known Member
hahaha, don't you realize how stupid you sound?

"there's no proof he wouldn't have killed anyone"
It was response to the post before that. He MAY have not killed anyone if the police didn't shoot him, but he may have also killed someone if they let him go.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Glockmatic said:
It was response to the post before that. He MAY have not killed anyone if the police didn't shoot him, but he may have also killed someone if they let him go.
The "prove it" argument is unflippable. Homie, listen to yourself.

"he may have killed someone if they let him go"

Please tell me this doesn't justify shooting him in your mindframe.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Answer the question, dog. You said:

"He MAY have not killed anyone if the police didn't shoot him, but he may have also killed someone if they let him go."

So the latter justifies shooting him according to you? If so, then i feel sorry for you.
 

ArtsyGirl

Well-Known Member
Then why in every case of joyriding and driving erratically from Police isnt the suspects riddled with bullets? They dissolve the situation differently and with no casualty to life.
 

Jokerman

Well-Known Member
This is part of a nationwide problem where police are routinely second guessed for their actions when they have to respond instantly and on the spot to a perceived threat. Every time a police officer puts on his uniform and goes out in the streets to protect the rest of us, he’s putting his life on the line. He gets little or no credit for that, but let him get into the kind of thing these officers faced, and he’s in a no-win situation. Had they stood by and allowed this thug to remain in control of that car no one knows what further crimes he might have committed but whatever they might have been, the officers would have been blamed for failing to stop him.

Sooner or later either cops on the street are going to fear doing the job we want done, or we won’t even be able to recruit the kind of officers we need to keep us safe.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Jokerman said:
Duke, someone pointing a gun at you may or may not kill you. Nevertheless, a shooting of them is justified.
I consider pointing a gun at someone and driving a car in reverse against your car two seperate things with totally seperate "threat-levels".
 

ArtsyGirl

Well-Known Member
Jokerman said:
This is part of a nationwide problem where police are routinely second guessed for their actions when they have to respond instantly and on the spot to a perceived threat. Every time a police officer puts on his uniform and goes out in the streets to protect the rest of us, he’s putting his life on the line. He gets little or no credit for that, but let him get into the kind of thing these officers faced, and he’s in a no-win situation. Had they stood by and allowed this thug to remain in control of that car no one knows what further crimes he might have committed but whatever they might have been, the officers would have been blamed for failing to stop him.

Sooner or later either cops on the street are going to fear doing the job we want done, or we won’t even be able to recruit the kind of officers we need to keep us safe.
Theres no doubt that the job these officers do is hard, and at times are too harshly judged. But when the judging of their actions isn't done we'll have a force of people with too much power and not enough punishment. And in some areas thats exactly whats going on.
But the fact remains this is the career they chose and if they arnt going to do it correctly they shouldnt be doing it at all. Certain people are right for certain jobs - same as police officers. I dont know for sure, I wasnt there the night this boy died but from what I know (which isnt alot - about as much as you) I feel they could have tried other measures to make sure the boy was stopped but not killed.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top