Glockmatic said:
theres no proof he wouldn't have killed anyone. If a kid won't stop for cops what makes you think he'll stop for anyone else?
hahaha, don't you realize how stupid you sound?
"there's no proof he wouldn't have killed anyone"
One could say the same thing about me, my dad, our cat or my 89yr old neighbour.
Should we shoot 'em all?
Of course there's no proof of that!!!! How you gonna proof he wouldn't have killed somebody?
And because he didn't "stop" for the cops that's not enough to assume he was about to go on a killing spree, right?
good police officers are trained to protect the community, not safely remove some idiot from his car becuz hes drunk, would u rather a few people die instead.
So, to protect people from dying, we'll kill the suspect on the spot.
Wait...there's something wrong with that....