ThaHeartless said:
ken, whats your view in regards to what im saying: do you think muslims should be allowed to tear down anything they deem offensive, anywhere in the country? or do you think a balance needs to be maintained and research done into particular areas and locations as to where this offensive material is displayed. e.g. A poster visible from an entrance to a mosque vs. one in the middle of a town centre. How will you judge which are offensive and which are not?
Should muslims be allowed to tear down anything they deem offensive?
most material of this nature has rules rules governing that material, as in this case there is a regulator (ASA). Or there may be a council, or some other authority. In shortm, the material should not be torn down but the authorities contacted and notified of offence because of some VALID reason.
When I prtially defended the vandalism of the billboard, it wasn't in the context of complete anarchy. I simply approached it from a angle similar to the civil unrest caused by the miners in the 80's, or the recent blockades at petrol refineries by truckers and taxi drivers. I think that both the miners and truckers caused a healthy level of civil disobedience.
the YSL billboard that I have posted. I myself complained against that and people in my area defaced the image, it was taken down. Should they have vandalised it? Well this kind of vandalism I was looking at from a similar perspective of the truckers who blockaded the refineries.
Should research be done, regarding billboards? well, if the billboards are indecent then they shouldn't be allowed in the first place. What is being advertised has never been a problem, you dont see people tearing down adverts advertising pork chops. Television has strict laws before the watershed, so to ask for indecent advertising to be removed from billboards is nothing new in british culture. They already have laws concerning decency in public and public broadcasting.