Technology Apple confirms Jan. 27 media event to show off 'latest creation'

S. Fourteen

Well-Known Member
An open letter to the world by Fake Steve

Dear human race,

First of all, you’re welcome. In the last few days I’ve been overwhelmed by your letters and calls expressing your gratitude to Apple, and mostly to me personally, for inventing yet another life-changing, mind-altering product. All I can tell you is that with iPad, as with all of our products, all we did was create something that we want to use. We’re just so glad that you want to use it too. It’s humbling, actually. When you devote your entire life to the endless, selfless quest to improve the lives of others; when you live a monk-like existence, and focus all of your power and genius on the singular goal of creating objects that nourish souls and transform people’s lives with magic and wonder; and when people tell you that this is, indeed, what you’ve done — well, it’s gratifying. Namaste, entire population of Spaceship Earth. I honor the place where your desire to consume becomes one with my desire to create.

Some pundits have posed the question: Why do anyone need this thing? Indeed, even those of you are lining up and standing outside stores may be wondering, Why am I doing this? Why am I lining up like a zombie for an expensive piece of consumer electronics, a product for which there is no shortage and which, let’s face it, nobody really needs? Back in the early days of our design process, Jonny Ive came in to see me and we spent a long time trying to decide where on Mazlow’s triangle this product would sit. Because we knew if we couldn’t be way up above the very top of that pyramid, floating above it, totally outside the needs it describes, then this wouldn’t be a product we wanted to make. Some of our early iterations, in fact, had to be tossed out because when we looked at them we realized that parts of them were too, well, necessary. Don’t get me wrong. That’s fine for other companies. It’s just not what we do here at Apple.

But let’s get back to you people who are waiting in line. I mean it’s not like you’re in Bolivia and there’s just been an earthquake and you need to line up to get food and clean water. It’s not like you’ve time-traveled back into the Depression and you’re waiting in line at a soup kitchen. And yet, in fact, that’s exactly what you’re doing. Spiritually speaking, we are living in the Great Depression, and you are waiting in line for sustenance. We, all of us, are experiencing the world that Deleuze and Guattari described so presciently in Capitalism and Schizophrenia. If you haven’t read this incredibly important two-volume work, I highly recommend that wait for us to make both volumes available on our iBooks store and then order them right away. The cool thing is that then, as you’re reading, you will have the strange and circular experience of discovering why you bought the iPad in the first place.

The truth is, this is all about spiritual emptiness. That is why you’re standing in line. Except for Scoble, who is an attention whore and just doing it to get attention.

The truth is, all over the world, across every culture, there exists a sense of yearning. A kind of malaise. An emptiness. At the risk of sounding like Dr. Seuss: There is a hole in your soul. That is what we’re addressing at Apple. That is the hole we aim to fill. Sadly, as you may have begun to suspect, that hole can never really be filled. The truth is that modernity, the condition of living in our modern world, has inflicted terrible wounds on your inner self. These wounds can never be healed. They can only be treated. At best we provide palliative care. Not a cure. Because, my dear fellow human beings, there is no cure for what ails you. The products we create provide only temporary relief. Their magic eventually wears off. The sense of childlike wonder they impart will, over time, begin to fade. And then you need a new product. Think back to July 29, 2007. Do you remember the rapture? The wonder of iPhone? The magic? Now that is gone, but here we come with another shot of digital Dilaudid. Sleep well, my friends. Sleep deeply and rest, cradled in the arms of my electronic medicine.

I’d also like to take a moment to thank all of the engineers and designers and programmers inside Apple who worked so tirelessly on this product, toiling way in total secrecy. I know it wasn’t easy. You had to work on a machine that was inside a sealed metal box, so you couldn’t actually see what you were doing. The box itself was chained to a desk, which was bolted to the floor in a windowless, lead-sealed concrete bunker. And you were chained to that same desk by your ankle. I know some of you considered it humiliating. I know many of you did not enjoy having to use a chamber pot instead of being allowed to leave the room for bathroom breaks. To be sure, the chamber pot was designed by Jonny Ive and is a model of simplicity and elegant design. Nevertheless, not a lot of fun. I know some of you grumbled, privately, about having your personal email read, and your phone calls monitored. You did not appreciate having your children followed to school and interrogated to see if Mom or Dad had been talking about work. The cars parked outside your house at night, the strange calls to your neighbors and relatives, the questionnaires about your sexual history, the lists of all your past lovers that you needed to provide — I know. It’s not easy to work at Apple. But I think you’ll agree with me that it’s worth the trouble. I honor your dedication, and I hope you will all enjoy the new wonder device that you have helped bring into the world.

Hold your iPad. Gaze at it. Pray to it. Let it transform you. And do it soon, because before you know it we are going to release version 2, which will make this one look like a total piece of crap. Peace be upon you.

Dear Leader
 

Kobe

Well-Known Member
Well, interesting and loooooong read. Good job on you guys for carrying this thread, from a few days before the announcement up to now.

I guess after reading all your posts and.......ahem.........unbiased opinions on this device, I have come to my conclusion. The ipad is not as bad as some of you make it out to be, but, its not as great as some of you make it out to be. In my simple opinion amidst all this technology talk: Would I buy one just because it's the latest toy? Yes. Would I buy one to replace my current laptop based activities? No.

OK, so the ipad is finally available. Any idea on what 'the next big thing is'? :D
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
wtf they were talking about this piece of shit in the fucken news today :nuts:
I saw all these extreme fanboys with "Apple" t-shirts saying things like "this is the most revolutionary device ever" !!
lmfao
 

S. Fourteen

Well-Known Member
Any idea on what 'the next big thing is'?
very exciting question you have brought forth

multitasking on the iPhone - why is it big? because masta and friends will need to look elsewhere to criticize.

as far as the next new products go - possibly 2 versions of iPhone in the future. there was a totally baseless rumor about a clamshell iPhone (LOL yea right).

but that's not really big is it? I guess the safest bet is overhaul of Apple TV since Google seems to be headed to your living room.

I believe any drastic changes to the iMac and MacBook lines are few years away. But I will have my credit card ready when the time comes.

in the mean time, please enjoy this video of masta and friends being cute

 

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
They should have done it in front of a group of fan boys and watch them bitch and moan. Like the fruits that waited in line for that Harry Potter book, and people were driving by and yelling the ending to ruin the book for them. lol.
 

Rukas

Capo Dei Capi
Staff member
I love how they pay for an iPad just to break it, like Apple gives a fuck what they do with it after they've paid, and they're all using iPhones to video it too LOL.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Aaron Gell: Love Freedom? Kill Your iPad

I'll admit to feeling a certain thrill last week when, tucked in to a back table at a grimy pizza place--a table so secluded, in fact, that the kitchen guy would eventually kick me out so he could scarf down a slice--I pulled a friend's loaner iPad from its box a few days ahead of the launch date and pressed the ON button.

Part of the thrill was doing this before most everyone else. The other part was simple novelty, which, let's face it, is a pretty routine thrill these days. Between Avatar, health care and now the iPad, it feels as if every day's Christmas. Which means every day's also the day after Christmas, when the excitement begins to fade and we start turning over the seat cushions looking for the next bump of consumerist woo-woo dust.

I will admit, the iPad might well turn out to be the greatest toy ever. But I hate it and all that it stands for, and I desperately hope it goes the way of the Newton. Why? Because it represents the final and most convincing piece of evidence yet of what I--a committed Mac fan who wouldn't buy a PC if it offered to rub my feet--have long feared: that when Jobs named his scrappy little computer company after Satan's forbidden fruit, he meant it as a compliment.

The difference is that Adam and Eve were cast out of Eden for their fateful snack, whereas we're all about to be trapped in iTunes' walled Garden forever (albeit without the nudity that made Paradise so great in the first place).

For all the nightmare scenarios about Google, it's now become evident that cheerfully rebellious underdog Apple may actually be the Corporate Beast to fear. Clearly Steve Jobs is a world class control freak, which is fine if you work at Apple or hold stock in the company or don't like changing batteries. He's also a visionary, after all. But recent controversies surrounding the iTunes App Store demonstrate that his megalomania could actually have profoundly negative consequences for our culture. Cory Doctorow nailed some of the problem, essentially making the open-source argument: The iPad isn't hackable. It's not democratic. It's for dummies and cultural Pringles-eaters who just want to sit back and take in stuff, not for creators and innovators who want to change the world or make lolcats, as the mood strikes.

Which is true. Walt Mossberg, David Pogue and everyone else also noted in their reviews that the iPad is a device better suited for consuming than creating (which is why you also have an iMac). But it's in precisely that respect--the way it brings users content--that the thing is actually so odious. Because Apple's ironclad control over what's available in the App Store means that the iPad's success (which is predicated not on sales of the probably underpriced device but of apps and other iStore content) is inversely proportional to our continued cultural freedom.

Unfortunately, the prime example is a ludicrous app called "Wobble iBoobs (Premium Uncensored)," which is a shame because nobody wants to be the idiot defending a program that showcases jiggling breasts, especially at a moment when everyone else is hyperventilating about a game-changing technological revolution that seems really cool. But here's what happened: After receiving unspecified "customer complaints" about iBoobs a few months ago, Apple banished it altogether, explaining in a letter to the developer that "We have decided to remove any overtly sexual content from the App Store."

Whaa? What's "overt sexual content"? And who's we? It's a pretty radical notion considering that such content is not only legal, but all over TV, the internet, the multiplex, your Aunt Ethel's diary and everywhere else you care to look for it. (Believe me, I've checked.)

The decision, which affected a number of other steamy apps, caused some consternation among developers--mostly because it reflected a sudden change in Apple's policy and cost the creators' money, since they'd been banking on revenue from apps that were no longer sellable. But I'm surprised by how little attention it's received from the media, who seem to be too busy racing to create their own apps for the iPad to read Apple's "Developer Program License Agreement," a copy of which, obtained via a Freedom of Information Request (since government agencies had agreed to it), has been posted online by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It makes for some scary reading, especially the part that says, "You understand and agree that Apple may cease distribution of Your Licensed Application(s) and/or Licensed Application Information or revoke the digital certificate of any of Your Applications at any time." And as the EFF further points out, Apple has installed a line of code called a "kill switch" in the iPhone and presumably the iPad, allowing the company to remotely disable any apps they deem inappropriate, even after you've purchased them.

Think about it: Our great new device for consuming media content is designed to work via third-party apps. Apple maintains the exclusive right to sell these apps, or not to, based on corporate fiat. And one reason the company has given for deep-sixing an app is that someone complained about similar material. You need only consider the implications of this for a second to realize that buying into the Apple model is media suicide. Operate a public library that way, and you'll have the ACLU crawling so far up your ass you'll spit binder clips. I mean, leaving aside the giddiness of the iPad launch, here's what we're talking about: A corporate entity has invented a device for consuming content and wields total, secret and capricious control over exactly what content consumers can use it for. Imagine for a second if Gutenberg pulled a move like that. Bye bye, Enlightenment.

It was also recently reported that Apple asked the German tabloid Bild (which has the second most popular news site in Germany) to remove naked women from its "Shake the Bild Girl" app, the point of which is apparently to let users undress the "girl of the day" by shaking their phones. Yes, it's another sophomoric app that's nearly impossible to defend! But when you consider that many newspapers around the world feature such cheesecake shots (including News Corp's The Sun), and that newspapers are struggling to stay in business, and that Bild's revenue (which funds the company's news gathering) will obviously take a hit due to Apple's decision, it's not hard to see what a Devil's bargain the device is. True, there's always the internet, and the iPad will indeed let you access it. But so far internet ad revenue is not making up for lost newsstand sales. And Apple's business plan--the would-be savior of the publishing industry--presupposes that users will increasingly consume content not through the internet but via the App Store, allowing the company not merely to take a healthy cut of the revenue but to decide what everyone can purchase. Come to think of it, that's exactly what the Chinese government is doing, except that the Chinese censors aren't making any money from the deal and aren't being swooned over by the same media they've set out to police.

Maybe you don't want to look at naked people at all. Fine, be that way. But to liberally paraphrase a famous poem about the Holocaust: First they came for the Wobble iBoobs app, and I didn't speak up because I don't have the Wobble iBoobs app...

The equation is pretty simple: Buy an iPad, and you're endorsing this model--giving a privately controlled corporation top-down, unilateral power over what you can see, read, watch, play and jiggle. It's quite literally the opposite of the marketplace of ideas that is the cornerstone of democracy. Google's approach to total global domination is looking better every second.

Am I overstating it? Maybe. After all, we have all those aforementioned platforms: TV, multiplex, CDs, pamplets, etc. But remember: Just about every media company right now is in survival mode, so every time we make a choice to, say, read a magazine via an iTunes app rather than purchasing it at the newsstand, we're forcing a publisher to play by Apple's arbitrary and secretive rules. It's already been noted that the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue (with which, again, the magazine makes a ton of revenue that helps funds the rest of its operations) features what could easily be considered "overt sexual content" (ask an eighth grader if you're not sure). There's no doubt that certain publishers, fearful of running afoul of Apple's censors, will begin making editorial choices based on the company's vague criteria, in much the same way Wal-Mart strong-arms its suppliers. Given that the current media land-grab will determine what content is produced for decades to come, anyone who cares about such things should think twice about buying an iPad. Or if you've bought one, figure out how to hack it so you can use outside apps. It's the American way.

Look, some of my best devices are Macs. I've been a fan for 25 years, ever since they ran that famous Superbowl commercial promising that, thanks to the introduction of Macintosh, "1984 won't be like 1984." We all remember the jackbooted thugs, the zombified drones in their gray pajamas, the slo-mo Olympian in a tanktop hurling a hammer at the giant TV. And who can forget the Big Brother-like dictator, intoning about "Information Purification Directives" and bragging about having created "a garden of pure ideology...where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths." You remember, right Steve?
iPad Problems: Users' BIGGEST Complaints So Far (PHOTOS)
 

S. Fourteen

Well-Known Member
Starting the argument with Farmville = massive fail.

Apps are far superior experience on the iPhone.
CNN actually has an iPad ready version of their site.
I think CNN has a paid app as well.

I'll take Google Finance for example, right now iPhone/iPad can't display the ubercool interactive chart. But Apple - iPad - Apps for iPad provides a superior experience.

some of the iPad ready sites
Apple - iPad-ready websites
Fairly easy to prepare your site
Technical Note TN2262: Preparing Your Web Content for iPad


I love the smell of desperation in the morning
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Admit it finally! No Flash = fail.

It's also true for older Androids too even though Andoid Apps > Iphone apps. They won't replace flash support for web browser.
 

Casey

Well-Known Member
Staff member
Apple said the iPad was a good device for browsing the web.

Not " a good device for browsing the web after every site that uses flash provides an alternative just for ipad users".

As masta said, no flash = EPIC fail and ipad fanboys KNOW it.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
^See, that's where you're wrong. Apple will not fail cause of Flash. People are used to Apple not supporting Flash on their mobile devices therefore developers will step in a la CNN app and create a back door to the content. It's simple supply and demand. If users want to visit a website but can't because of no Flash support, an app developer will step in to make a profit.
 

masta247

Well-Known Member
Staff member
It is a huge fail. While big sites will maybe release some fancy apps still vast majority will not.
For example most sites I visit do need flash to work (sometimes to open) and they don't have any apps. I just did a google search.
Shit, some big sites even don't have their html versions. They spend too much money to make their sites beautiful and Flash is a no.1 tool for "eye-candy" on the web - they would rather make you download flash than see some uglier version of their site - especially since over 90% of devices used to browse the web have flash support.

So Iphone and Ipad owners will have to depend on fanboys or developers to create apps which would allow them to potentially use their favorite sites in a limited way.
And yes, I agree that apps have their positives over websites too. Most of all they fell more "personal" as opposed to "public" websites somewhere on the net rather than on your own phone.
But in no way they can replace the flash support - they do in a very limited way for a very limited amount of services.
Allowing a freaking flash lite would be the easiest and most reasonable and comfortable solution.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top