Aristotle said:
People must think we live in a Utopia or something. You can't just remove discrimination, it will always exist.
You can reduce it. People living under slavery probably doubted it would ever end. People living under segregation probably doubted it would ever end. As time goes by, tolerance increases.
And if someone hits me it is wrong for me to hit htem back? Shit i forgot, I'm supposed to take the kicks.
This isn't a case of you defending yourself. If someone discriminates against you personally, it's fair for you to react against them personally (within reason). What you can't do is discriminate against other people of the same race as person. That's called racism. One white guy refuses to give you a job, it doesn't give you the right to take a job that someone else deserves.
Sometimes the only thing that can stop evil is evil, so be it.
I'm suprised beReal hasn't said this yet, but..."an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".
You try to make it seem like it is so easy, of course it is easy for a white man to figure out, nothing will change for him.
I never said it was easy to level the playing field and remove discrimination. What's easy is to use a stop-gap measure like Affirmative Action. The easy answer is rarely the best one.
If im a black student there is animosity towards me with or without Affirmative Action.
Of course there is racism in places, I'm not denying that. But do you think that animosity is going to be quelled if you get a job which you don't, based on qualifications, deserve to get?
The only reason we see most minorities at Universities nowadays is because of sports. "We make up 12% of the population but make up 90% of the Final Four" - Chris Rock.
You can't say "Affirmative Action increases the number of minorities in Universities, and therefore it's good". Firstly, the California example I gave says otherwise. Secondly, if you let all minorities into University, regardless of grades, that would increase the number of minorities in Univerisities. Would that improve the situation? No. It's not an achievement to increase the number of minorities in Univerisites if they're not all there on merit.
No one is going to fund the ghetto, what investor would do that? That's why Affirmative Action is the only answer right now, give us a chance to go to those schools with good teachers and up to date textbooks.
The government should be responsible for providing an adequate level of funding for schools. There are plenty of schemes in place to improve the 'ghettos'. I'm sure all these multi-millionnaire rappers who constantly proclaim their love for the 'ghettos' can afford to chip in a couple of weeks record sales to improve the situation. It's called charity, people don't do it expecting any return on investment.
Also you do look at your people and look at slavery and feel that they were succeeding, they sure as hell thought so.
No, I don't. I don't look at the war in Iraq and enjoy seeing white soldiers abuse and kill innocent Arabs. You can't honestly think I'm proud of discrimination against minorities? If you go up for a job and don't get it because of your race, do you think I smile and chalk one up for the white team?
If my people are starting to feel like they are succeeding so be it. If it takes the government making a policy that is helping my people so be it. Who is it hurting, seriously, and don't over exagerate the situation either.
I don't see how you can feel proud or successful if you've been allowed into a University or given a job because of your skin colour.
If I get a job based on merit, I would be proud of the effort I'd put in. If I get a job based on race, how can I be proud of my skin colour, something I had nothing to do with? Who is it hurting? Isn't that obvious? If I give someone a job because they're white, I'm hurting all the non-whites who applied for the job. If I give someone a job because they're black, I'm hurting all the non-blacks who applied for the job. But of course, when you see the word "white" you picture a spoiled rich white kid living in a mansion, and when you see the word "black" you think of a poor oppressed black kid living in the 'ghetto'.
Maybe they are targeting minorities with Affirmative Action because they make up the majority of the poor people, ever think of that?
Here's a wacky idea. If you want to target poor people, base your system on socieconomic status. Where's the sense in saying "A lot of minorities are poor, why don't we just give them the benefits?". If, as you now seem to be implying, Affirmative Action is supposed to help out poor people, why give a rich black kid preferential treatment over a poor white kid?
Truthfully i think this whole thing is a waste of time, how can a white person understand what i feel or the hate i have encountered. Why aren't you complaining about me being able to drink from the same fountain as you, isn't that a form of Affirmative Action. I am being given oppurtunity, don't hate on me for taking it.
Stop trying to imply I'm racist. I'm the one arguing for equality, you're the one supporting a system of legalised discrimination.
I'm not complaining about you being able to drink from the same fountain as you. That's equality. If that
were Affirmative Action, then you'd be allowed to drink from the fountain ahead of me. You'd be able to cut ahead of me in the queue because you're black and I'm white. That's essentially what Affirmative Action is.