dee said:
..u say "what i see is"...then in point 2 u say it'z reasonable to assume he'z resisting..thas not wut u saw...then u say we're cop haters for reasonably assuming which u juss did (made me laughh when i read it)...
It's called sarcasm. Anyone who came to the conclusion that he was cooperating at that point would be
un-reasonably assuming those things I mentioned about the situation. On the other hand, when we see them bringing his hands in back to cuff him and then a moment later we see them struggling with him uncuffed, it's
reasonable to assume he resisted being cuffed.
And when I said "NO TOTALLY UNCALLED FOR" at the beginning of my post, I was jokingly quoting the thread starter, since it seemed funny that someone (Jurhum) would ask me what I thought about it after what I said in my earlier posts.
Anyway, no one's trying to be politically correct, except maybe the cop-haters because that's what's politically correct now. I just use my own mind to decide each case, and not let Tupac songs, or whatever, determine what position I take any time cops do anything.