download O.J.'s "If I Did It" book

Big Flipp

Active Member
May 7, 2001
808
43
28
45
Austin, TX
www.myspace.com
http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3714107/O.J._Simpson_IF_I_DID_IT_eBook_PDF_3r1c

“I’m going to tell you a story you’ve never heard before, because no one knows this story the way I know it. It takes place on the night June 12, 1994, and it concerns the murder of my ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her young friend, Ronald Goldman. I want you to forget everything you think you know about that night because I know the facts better than anyone. I know the players. I’ve seen the evidence. I’ve heard the theories. And, of course, I’ve read all the stories: That I did it. That I did it but I don’t know I did it. That I can no longer tell fact from fiction. That I wake up in the middle of the night, consumed by guilt, screaming.”
“I looked over at Goldman, and I was fuming. I guess he thought I was going to hit him, because he got into his little karate stance. “What the fuck is that?” I said. “You think you can take me with your karate shit?” He started circling me, bobbing and weaving, and if I hadn’t been so fucking angry I would have laughed in his face. “O.J., come on!” It was Charlie again, pleading. Nicole moaned, regaining consciousness. She stirred on the ground and opened her eyes and looked at me, but it didn’t seem like anything was registering. Charlie walked over and planted himself in front of me blocking my view. “We are fucking done here, man-let’s go!”
 
i just read in the paper the other day that the Goldman family won a ruling that made OJ turn over the money he got from the book deal that he tried to hide, and they also got rights to the book. they may release it under the title "Confessions Of A Killer" or something like that.

DarkPhantom13 said:
Is this real?
have you been living under a rock? you never heard about the big fuss that was made when OJ planned to release it? or was your comment about the legitimacy of the torrent file?
 
have you been living under a rock? you never heard about the big fuss that was made when OJ planned to release it? or was your comment about the legitimacy of the torrent file?

I know about the book numnuts! I was asking if the leaking of the book was real.
 
Yeah it leaked a few days ago I think.
Ron Goldman's family is trying to sue TMZ.com for hosting the links.

It was a big shit all over the radios n etc today.
 
Everyone should download the book and not give this evil basterd any money.

As far as i know OJ Simpson tells us in this book,how he would have killed his ex wife if he did do it.It doesnt say that he actuallt did the murder but how he would have done it.Maybe im wrong but i think i saw this somewhere.
 
OJ didn't do it.

This book is fictional, a made-up story of how he would have done it. But this isn't how it went down, this is just OJ trying to make some money out of a controversial incident in his life.

It's fucking stupid. Why would you do this? If I was falsely accused of murder and then found not guilty, all the money in the world would not convince me to do something this retarded.
 
^^Yea thats what i meant.Its disgraceful that he would bring out a book like this.He is meant to be a nasty piece of shit.Why are you so sure that he didnt murder her Militant.?
 
^^Yea thats what i meant.Its disgraceful that he would bring out a book like this.He is meant to be a nasty piece of shit.Why are you so sure that he didnt murder her Militant.?

I think he could have done it, and he is indeed a fucked up person, but in this situation, the evidence just ain't there.

I'd say it's likely that he may have had some indirect involvement, maybe paid someone to do it, formulated some sort of plan to make himself look guilty whilst knowing there wouldn't be concrete evidence to convict him - and the media storm around him would take the heat off whoever did it. This would explain the ridiculously over the top car-chase with OJ allegedly holding a loaded gun to his friends hit that was covered by the entire Western media, live. I think this was a ploy, while everyone was focusing on this, the real killer was making his escape, possibly to a country that he couldnt be extradited from.

But he was being accused of directly murdering them, and I don't think he did.
 
Well, either way he is responsible for her death.Doesn't matter if he was directly or indirectly involved,it doesn't make him any less guilty.
 
Well, either way he is responsible for her death.Doesn't matter if he was directly or indirectly involved,it doesn't make him any less guilty.

Guilty of what? He's not guilty of what he was tried for.
 
You are still a murderer if you get somebody else to do the dirty work for you.

That depends on your moral convictions and individual outlook. In the eyes of the law, OJ is innocent.
 
That depends on your moral convictions and individual outlook. In the eyes of the law, OJ is innocent.
ummm, no, they just never charged him with conspiracy to commit murder. it is murder if you pay someone to kill a person. however the police didn't believe he paid someone to commit the murder, they believed he killed them. and he was found responsible for their deaths.

unlike you, i firmly believe that OJ did the murders. the way they were killed, especially Nicole, whose head was nearly removed, indicates great rage on the part of the killer. if OJ paid someone to commit the murders, they would have more than likely been execution-style murders, instead of being carved up with a knife. a hired killer wouldn't need to go psycho with killing them. who else had that much rage towards Nicole and Ron? who else had a motive to kill them, and so brutally? OJ's lawyers did a fantastic job of showing reasonable doubt, but it was that asshole Fuhrman that basically set OJ free. OJ is a killer. whether or not it went down the way he wrote it in the book is debatable, but i'm convinced he killed them.
 
ummm, no, they just never charged him with conspiracy to commit murder. it is murder if you pay someone to kill a person. however the police didn't believe he paid someone to commit the murder, they believed he killed them. and he was found responsible for their deaths.

Legally, OJ is not guilty of murder. You can speculate until the cows come home on whether he is guilty of conspiracy - simple fact is, he was not charged with that.

The police did not believe he killed them, any more than they belived he didn't kill them - if they did they would be biased. The police believed he might have killed them, hence he was a suspect and put on trial, where he was found not guilty.

OJ was not found responsible for their deaths.



unlike you, i firmly believe that OJ did the murders. the way they were killed, especially Nicole, whose head was nearly removed, indicates great rage on the part of the killer. if OJ paid someone to commit the murders, they would have more than likely been execution-style murders, instead of being carved up with a knife. a hired killer wouldn't need to go psycho with killing them. who else had that much rage towards Nicole and Ron? who else had a motive to kill them, and so brutally? OJ's lawyers did a fantastic job of showing reasonable doubt, but it was that asshole Fuhrman that basically set OJ free. OJ is a killer. whether or not it went down the way he wrote it in the book is debatable, but i'm convinced he killed them.

Whether or not you believe OJ did it, is irrelevant, since the law doesn't agree. There is such a thing as a psychotic hired killer, not every hitman works with the fluidity and accuracy of James Bond.

Have you ever read The Godfather? Don't say you've seen the movie, it's not the same thing. If you've read the novel you'll know of the fury of hitman Luca Brasi who brutally murdered every person he was hired to kill, in far worse ways than Nicole was killed. Sure, it's a fictional book but most of the book and that character in particular was directly based on the accounts of professional mafiosi.

The fact is, Fuhrman was a racist, crooked cop, who planted evidence against OJ and got exposed for it. Not only that, he fully invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions about evidence-planting (why do this if you had nothing to hide?), and furthermore later on admitted to lying in court and was kicked out of the police force.

That says it all. The strongest piece of evidence was planted and furthermore doesn't match up to anything else? Like the late great Johnnie Cochran said "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit".

Didn't I break you down before when you suggested MJ was guilty, as well? You got something against successful black folks, Devious? :D...lol...i'm just fuckin with ya.

On the real I think OJ probably did it, but not directly as I've stated. MJ though, is 100% innocent.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Back in the day, we used to recieve donations sent as cash in fake birthday cards! Those were the days! I still have some of them, actually.

Now we have crypto.

Ethereum/EVM: 0x9c70214f34ea949095308dca827380295b201e80

Bitcoin: bc1qa5twnqsqm8jxrcxm2z9w6gts7syha8gasqacww

Solana: 8xePHrFwsduS7xU4XNjp2FRArTD7RFzmCQsjBaetE2y8

Members online

No members online now.