apollo - did they land on the moon...

[JarG]

there r so many things that we can say it CAN be fake...

http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Did we land on the Moon.htm

there is a film about that i have got it, some documentary and in film they are showin everything...

what u think ?:]

 

[AmerikazMost]

I don't think it was a hoax, but I wouldn't put it by them.

We'll know in a year or two anyway when Japan takes pictures of the entire moon to map it (if they still plan to do that).

I didn't read the whole thing, but his argument against 4d is wrong. He's right about how you can change perspective to alter the foreground more than the background, but the direction in which you would move from the first picture to the second would not cut out the Lunar Module.

 

[PuffnScruff]

the part about no stars in the background pics has been explained. i cant explain it but you can find information about it that is better explained than the one in the link

if people would spend the same amount of time reading up on conspiracy theories reading up on the facts they would be smarter people for doing so. but it is so much easier to believe the CT's

a lot of the theories are really pseudo intelligence

could something like this be faked? sure. do i believe it was? not at all.

all though i have heard some crazy theories about what is on the dark side of the moon.

the really sad part about these type of CT's is that it really discredits the evolution of man kind

 

[Glockmatic]

i use to believe that moon landing was fake, then i read up on it and it was easily explained

 

[AmerikazMost]

all though i have heard some crazy theories about what is on the dark side of the moon.

such as?

 

[Phusion]

I can't see it. The amount of technology that it is now and the pictures that they got of Mars and shit makes me believe that it wasn't a hoax. I mean it aint like the moon's finna be that much of a challenge

 

[KAMIKAZI]

This calls for a dancing star

 

[Tru Principle]

I met the first man to walk in space, we asked him that question... he stood up, almost with a teary eye and with a passioante voice.. he said... I worked closely with the Apollo team... they were my friends... I knew them... well... then he swore that they landed on the moon.. etc..

 

[jbrolax]

if we landed on the moon, then we blew the wtc up, so yes we landed on the moon....

 

[Tru Principle]

such as?

LOL... I wish for one second I wasn't a Biologist... and I paid more attention in my Astronomy class.. but just ask any Astronomer... he/she will gladly explain to you... there is no such thing as "dark side" of the moon... we know everything that's on the moon.. planets rotate, and some sides get light at this time and then on at another time they don't.. and there are some parts, that simply get low levels of light... but whatever... physics isn't my strength, so I can't explain it well... just ask anybody who majors in this shit.

 

[PuffnScruff]

such as?

basically that there are alien bases on the other side of the moon and the govt knows about it. stupid CT shit. i'm not saying i believe them. the day i do start is the day i join the Nation of Islam and join crazykhan on the ring shapped mother ship that is floating outside earths orbit

 

[brigante]

The only theory nobody explained so far is that of the american flag. Why was it waving in the "wind" if there is no atmosphere ? That's the only thing that bugs me... And why didn't they go back ?

 

[JarG]

http://lepszyswiat.web.cedant.com/filmy/didwelandonthemooncaly.wmv

i think its worh downloading its 85 mb
interesting documentary!

 

[Illuminattile]

The only theory nobody explained so far is that of the american flag. Why was it waving in the "wind" if there is no atmosphere ? That's the only thing that bugs me... And why didn't they go back ?

"The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. Since there is no air on the Moon to provide friction, these movements caused a long-lasting undulating movement seen in the flag. There was a rod extending from the top of the flagpole to hold the flag out for proper display. The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph. The top supporting rod of the flag was telescopic and the crew of Apollo 11 found they could not fully extend it. Later crews did not fully extend this rod because they liked how it made the flag appear. A viewing of the videotape made during the moonwalk shows that shortly after the astronauts remove their hands from the flag/flagpole, it stops moving and remains motionless. At one point the flag is in view for well over thirty minutes and it remains completely motionless throughout that period (and all similar periods)."

 

[JarG]

^its not true, flag was waving alone without astronauts hands

 

[Butt Rubber]

only a complete fucking idiot would say it's fake.

nuff said.

 

[JarG]

i am not sayin it was fake, just its interesting...anyway that documentary is also real interesting..and not complete stupid the main reason was that usa wanted to be there before CCCP ...

 

[Illuminattile]

^its not true, flag was waving alone without astronauts hands

No, it wasn't.

 

[JarG]

^yes it was u can see it on documentary that i posted in this thread, just watch it

 

[Illuminattile]

^yes it was u can see it on documentary that i posted in this thread, just watch it

I'm not downloading 85mb of bullshit.

From the first link you posted, in the first post of the thread;

It has also been claimed that some video clips show the flag waving in the breeze when it was planted. Not so. The movement of the flag is only because when astronauts were planting the flagpole they rotated it back and forth to better penetrate the lunar soil. Without an atmosphere it takes a while for this movement to damp down. There is not one video clip showing the flag moving when the astronauts are not holding it, a fact never mentioned by the hoax believers.

Do you read things before posting them?